scholarly journals A discrete-choice experiment of United Kingdom patients' willingness to risk adverse events for improved function and pain control in osteoarthritis

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.B. Hauber ◽  
N.K. Arden ◽  
A.F. Mohamed ◽  
F.R. Johnson ◽  
P.M. Peloso ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shan Jin ◽  
Zijian Tan ◽  
Taoran Liu ◽  
Sze Ngai Chan ◽  
Jie Sheng ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Virtual reality (VR) can be used to build many different scenes aimed at reducing study-related stress. However, few academic experiments about university students for preference testing have been done. Our study aimed to assess the preference of VR games for stress and depression prevention by using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). OBJECTIVE The candidate could wear the headset and alleviate the stress and depression in the game. The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the preference of VR technology in college students’ psychological pressure relief and depression prevention. METHODS Five different attributes were selected based on the depression therapy parameter and attributes about VR: (1) treatment modality, (2) therapy duration, (3) perceived remission rate, (4) probability of adverse events, and the (5) monthly cost of adding treatment to a discrete choice experiment. By comparing different attributes and levels, we could draw some conclusions about the depression therapy testing preference for university students. One university student was responsible for VR scene development and one for candidate recruitment. RESULTS The utility report of different attributes for “zero” probability of adverse events was higher than others (99.22), and the VR treatment as the most popular treatment method when compared with counseling and medicine treatment was 80.95. Three parameter aspects (different treatments for depression) were statistically significant (P<0.001), including “0%” and “50%” of “Probability of adverse events” and “RMB$500” of “The monthly cost of treatment”. Most individuals preferred 12 months as the therapy duration, and the odds ratio of “12 months” was 1.095 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.945–1.270) when compared with the reference of level of “6 months”. Meanwhile, the cheapest price (RMB $500) of depression therapy was the optimum choice for most students. CONCLUSIONS People placed great preference on VR technology psychological intervention methods, which indicates that VR may have a potential market in prevention and treatment of psychological problems. However, adverse events and treatment costs need to be considered. This study can be used to guide policies that are relevant to the development of application of VR technology in the field of psychological pressure and depression prevention. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-doi:10.2196/29375


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuo Sugitani ◽  
Kyoko Ito ◽  
Shunsuke Ono

Our study objective was to determine lung cancer chemotherapy attributes that are important to patients in Japan. A discrete choice experiment survey in an anonymous web-based questionnaire format with a reward was completed by 200 lung cancer patients in Japan from November 25, 2019, to November 27, 2019. The relative importance of patient preferences for each attribute was estimated using a conditional logit model. A hierarchical Bayesian logit model was also used to estimate the impact of each demographic characteristic on the relative importance of each attribute. Of the 200 respondents, 191 with consistent responses were included in the analysis. In their preference, overall survival was the most important, followed by diarrhea, nausea, rash, bone marrow suppression (BMS), progression-free survival, fatigue, interstitial lung disease, frequency of administration, and duration of administration. The preferences were influenced by demographic characteristics (e.g., gender and age) and disease background (e.g., cancer type and stage). Interestingly, the experience of cancer drug therapies and adverse events had a substantial impact on the hypothetical drug preferences. For the Japanese lung cancer patients, improved survival was the most important attribute that influenced their preference for chemotherapy, followed by adverse events, including diarrhea, nausea, rash, and BMS. The preferences varied depending on the patient’s demographic and experience. As drug attributes can affect patient preferences, pharmaceutical companies should be aware of the patient preferences and develop drugs that respond to segmented market needs.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Torbica ◽  
Carla Rognoni ◽  
Rosanna Tarricone

Abstract Background: Chronic conditions have important long-term consequences for patients’ personal and social lives and require patient commitment to their management. In this context, the assessment of patients’ preferences for treatment characteristics would increase the current evidence on the impact of diseases to support decision-making processes in the field of public policies and research and development in pharmaceutical industries.The present study used cases of chronic migraine to assess patients’ preferences, including the analysis of gender differences, for the characteristics of an ideal migraine treatment. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was performed with 466 adults with migraine in Italy who experienced at least 4 attacks per month. We investigated the preferences of patients with respect to five treatment attributes that were identified from a systematic literature review and two focus group elicitations. The heterogeneity of preferences was investigated in a mixed logit model with normally distributed random coefficients.Results: Overall, the respondents considered the presence of adverse events, duration of the treatment effect, reduction of symptom intensity, speed of the effect and the cost born by the patient as the most relevant treatment features. As expected, the patients preferred treatments with lower levels of adverse events and costs and treatments with greater speed, duration of treatment effect and effectiveness in reducing symptom intensity. There was significant preference heterogeneity only for the presence of adverse events. Compared to men, women had significantly higher preferences for quicker treatment effect and limited adverse events and reported higher preferences for costly treatments.Conclusions: The results of our survey help address research and development strategies in the pharmaceutical industry and public policy regarding treatments that are clinically effective and responsive to the needs expressed by patients.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Enrique Loria-Rebolledo ◽  
Mandy Ryan ◽  
Verity Watson ◽  
Mesfin G Genie ◽  
Ruben Andreas Sakowsky ◽  
...  

Objective To understand how individuals make trade-offs between features of lockdown interventions to control a pandemic across the four nations of the United Kingdom. Design Survey that included a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). The survey design was informed using policy documents, social media analysis and with input from remote think aloud interviews with members of the public (n=23). Setting Nation-wide survey across the four nations of the United Kingdom. Representative sample in terms of age and sex for each of the nations recruited using an online panel between 29th October and 12th December 2020. Participants Individuals who are over 18 years old. A total of 4120 adults completed the survey (1112 in England, 848 in Northern Ireland, 1143 in Scotland and 1098 in Wales). Primary outcome measure Adult preferences for, and trade-offs between, type of lockdown restrictions, length of lockdown, postponement of routine healthcare, excess deaths, impact on ability to buy things and unemployment. Results In all four countries, one out of five respondents were willing to reduce excess deaths at all costs. The majority of adults are willing to accept higher excess deaths if this means lockdowns that are less strict, shorter and do not postpone routine healthcare. On average, respondents in England were willing to accept a higher increase in excess deaths to have less strict lockdown restrictions introduced compared to Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales, respectively. Conclusions The majority of the UK population is willing to accept the increase in excess deaths associated with introducing less strict lockdown restrictions. The acceptability of different restriction scenarios varies according to the features of the lockdown and across countries. Authorities can use information about trade-off preferences to inform the introduction of different lockdown restriction levels, and design compensation policies that maximise societal welfare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document