Systematic review and meta-analsyis of the prevalence of neuropathic-like pain and/or pain sensitisation in people with knee and hip osteoarthritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S53
Author(s):  
L. Zolio ◽  
K.Y. Lim ◽  
M.K. Yan ◽  
M.M. Estee ◽  
S.M. Hussain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hip Osteoarthritis ◽  
Pain Sensitisation

scholarly journals The quality of intervention reporting in trials of therapeutic exercise for hip osteoarthritis: a secondary analysis of a systematic review

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise C. Burgess ◽  
Thomas W. Wainwright ◽  
Khara A. James ◽  
Johan von Heideken ◽  
Maura D. Iversen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Internal Validity ◽  
Hip Osteoarthritis ◽  
Therapeutic Exercise ◽  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Intervention Reporting

Abstract Background Therapeutic exercise is recommended as a core treatment for hip osteoarthritis (HOA). Whilst it is widely accepted that exercise can improve pain and disability, optimal type and dose of exercise are yet to be agreed upon. This may, in part, be attributed to the wide variation and inadequate reporting of interventions within the literature. This study evaluates the quality of intervention reporting among trials of therapeutic exercise in HOA. Methods Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were sourced in a systematic review, completed in August 2020. Two raters independently used the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) and Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) to evaluate intervention reporting. Correlations between quality assessment scores and CERT and TIDieR scores evaluated the relationship between internal validity and external applicability. The year of publication was compared to the quality of reporting scores. Results Fourteen RCTs were included in the analysis. On average, studies were awarded 9.43 ± 1.95 out of 12 points for the TIDieR checklist (range 4–12) and 13.57 ± 4.01 out of 19 points for the CERT (range 5–19). Pearson’s correlation coefficient suggested that the quality of reporting had improved over time and that there was a fair, positive relationship between internal validity and external applicability. Discussion Whilst the quality of intervention reporting is improving, many RCTs of therapeutic exercise in HOA lack the detail necessary to allow accurate evaluation and replication. Researchers are encouraged to utilise the standardised reporting guidelines to increase the translation of effective interventions into clinical practice.

scholarly journals Intra-articular saline injection as effective as corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid for hip osteoarthritis pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

2020 ◽  
pp. bjsports-2020-102179
Author(s):  
Aaron Gazendam ◽  
Seper Ekhtiari ◽  
Anthony Bozzo ◽  
Mark Phillips ◽  
Mohit Bhandari
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hip Osteoarthritis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Saline Injection ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Indirect Comparisons

ObjectiveIntra-articular (IA) injections represent a commonly used modality in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis (OA). Commonly used injections include corticosteroids (CCS), hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). A network meta-analysis allows for comparison among more than two treatment arms and uses both direct and indirect comparisons between interventions. The objective of this network meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of the various IA injectable treatments in treating hip OA at up to 6 months of follow-up.DesignThis is a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Bayesian random-effects model was performed to assess the direct and indirect comparisons of all treatment options.Data sourcesPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science, from inception to October 2019.Eligibility criteria for selected studiesRandomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy of CCS, HA, PRP and placebo in the form of IA saline injection for patients with hip OA.ResultsEleven randomised controlled trials comprising 1353 patients were included. For pain outcomes at both 2–4 and 6 months, no intervention significantly outperformed placebo IA injection. For functional outcomes at both 2–4 and 6 months, no intervention significantly outperformed placebo IA injection. Regarding change from baseline at 2–4 months and 6 months, pooled data demonstrated that all interventions (including placebo), with the exception of HA+PRP, led to a clinically important improvement in both pain, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference.ConclusionEvidence suggests that IA hip saline injections performed as well as all other injectable options in the management of hip pain and functional outcomes.

Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma in the management of hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Medina-Porqueres ◽  
Miguel Ortega-Castillo ◽  
Alfonso Muriel-Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hip Osteoarthritis

scholarly journals Efficacy and potential determinants of exercise therapy in knee and hip osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 356-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siew-Li Goh ◽  
Monica S.M. Persson ◽  
Joanne Stocks ◽  
Yunfei Hou ◽  
Jianhao Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Exercise Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hip Osteoarthritis

scholarly journals The benefits and harms of therapeutic exercise on physical and psychosocial outcomes in people with multimorbidity: Protocol for a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 2235042X2092045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessio Bricca ◽  
Lasse K Harris ◽  
Madalina Saracutu ◽  
Susan M Smith ◽  
Carsten B Juhl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hip Osteoarthritis ◽  
Diabetes Type 2 ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Therapeutic Exercise ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Cochrane Reviews ◽  
Meta Analyses

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the benefits and harms of therapeutic exercise in people with multimorbidity defined as the combination of two or more of the following conditions: knee and hip osteoarthritis, hypertension, diabetes type 2, depression, heart failure, ischaemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, by performing a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: This study will be performed according to the recommendations from the Cochrane Collaboration and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We will search for RCTs investigating the effect of therapeutic exercise in multimorbidity, as defined above, in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and CINAHL from 1990. Cochrane reviews on the effect of therapeutic exercise for each of the aforementioned conditions and references of the included studies will be checked for eligible studies and citation tracking will be performed in Web of Science. We will assess the risk of bias of the included studies using the Cochrane ‘Risk of Bias Tool’ 2.0 and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment for judging the overall quality of evidence. Meta-analyses will be performed, if possible, using a random-effects model as heterogeneity is expected due to differences in interventions and participant characteristics and outcome measures. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses will be performed to explore potential predictors of outcomes. Dissemination: The results of this systematic review will be published in a peer-review journal, presented at national and international conferences and made available to end users via infographics, podcasts, press releases and videos.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document