scholarly journals WHO grade III meningioma: De novo tumors show improved progression free survival as compared to secondary progressive tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 105-109
Author(s):  
Jacob Ruzevick ◽  
Alec Gibson ◽  
Philip Tatman ◽  
Samuel Emerson ◽  
Manuel Ferreira
Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3351
Author(s):  
Andrea Daniela Maier ◽  
Christian Beltoft Brøchner ◽  
Jiri Bartek Jr. ◽  
Frank Eriksson ◽  
Heidi Ugleholdt ◽  
...  

Meningiomas with inherently high mitotic indices and poor prognosis, such as WHO grade III meningiomas, have not been investigated separately to establish interchangeability between conventional mitotic index counted on H&E stained slides (MI) and mitotic index counted on phosphohistone-H3 stained slides (PHH3 MI). This study investigates the agreement of MI and PHH3 MI and to analyze the association of progression-free survival (PFS) and MI, PHH3 MI, and the proliferative index (PI, Ki-67) in WHO grade III meningioma. Tumor specimens from 24 consecutive patients were analyzed for expression of Ki-67, PHH3 MI, and MI. Quantification was performed independently by two observers who made replicate counts in hot spots and overall tumor staining. Repeatability in replicate counts from MI and PHH3 MI was low in both observers. Consequently, we could not report the agreement. MI, PHH3 MI and hot spot counts of Ki-67 were associated with PFS (MI hot spot HR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.12–2.31, p = 0.010; PHH3 MI hot spot HR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.15–2.21, p = 0.006; Ki-67 hot spot HR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.02–1.11. p = 0.004). We found markedly low repeatability of manually counted MI and PHH3 MI in WHO grade III meningioma, and we could not conclude that the two methods agreed. Subsequently, quantification with better repeatability should be sought. All three biomarkers were associated with PFS.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2332-2332
Author(s):  
Maria Goldaniga ◽  
Francesco Merli ◽  
Caterina Stelitano ◽  
Vincenzo Callea ◽  
Fiorella Ilariucci ◽  
...  

Abstract Indolent Non-follicular non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NFo-NHL) is a group of relatively frequent lymphoproliferative diseases, nevertheless extended clinical and prognostic studies are still lacking. In 2002 the Gruppo Italiano Studio Linfomi (GISL) initiated a LL02 prospective multicenter phase II trial, with the aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FC combination in the first-line therapy of NFo-NHL patients younger than 70 years. Between July 2002 and September 2006, 58 adult patients (35 males and 23 females, median age 64 yrs, range 40–75) affected by NFo-NHL in active disease phase, were consecutively enrolled in 12 GISL Hematological Centres. Patients were treated with a dose of 25 mg/mq Fludarabine plus 250 mg/mq Cyclophosphamide administred intravenously daily for 3 days; each cycle was repeated every 28 days for 6 courses. During the treatment patients received oral thrimethoprim-sulphametoxazole prophylaxis. After the intermediate evaluation, 48/58 patients (82.8%) had an objective response (ORR) with a 20.7% of complete remission (CR) plus 62.1% of partial remission (PR); at the final evaluation the ORR percentage was 84.5% with a 41.4% of CR (24 pts) and 43.1% of PR (25 pts); three patients were in progressive disease (5.2%) and one in stable disease (1.7%). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached with an 88% and 84% at 12 and 24 months; the progression free survival (PFS) was 89% and 77% and the event free survival (EFS) was 81% and 66% at 12 and 24 months respectively.About the toxicity profile, the major toxicity was hematological with a 18% cases of WHO grade III or IV anemia, 40% leucopenia, 33% neutropenia and 10% piastrinopenia. The 12% of patients had an infective episode wich a 7.7% of WHO grade III–IV.In conclusion the FC chemotherapy is a useful chance for advanced untreated non follicular low-grade NHL, with an optimal ORR, CR and PFS. The crucial point of FC remains OS, that not seems to be significantly improved in comparison with fludarabine alone or with standard therapy, even though the better quality of responses; Rituximab plus FC association is growing in literature as the probably key to find a real improvement also in this aspect.


2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 673-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tene A. Cage ◽  
Aaron J. Clark ◽  
Derick Aranda ◽  
Nalin Gupta ◽  
Peter P. Sun ◽  
...  

Object Ependymoma is the third most common primary brain tumor in children. Tumors are classified according to the WHO pathological grading system. Prior studies have shown high levels of variability in patient outcomes within and across pathological grades. The authors reviewed the results from the published literature on intracranial ependymomas in children to describe clinical outcomes as they relate to treatment modality, associated mortality, and associated progression-free survival (PFS). Methods A search of English language peer-reviewed articles describing patients 18 years of age or younger with intracranial ependymomas yielded data on 182 patients. These patients had undergone treatment for ependymoma with 1 of 5 modalities: 1) gross-total resection (GTR), 2) GTR as well as external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), 3) subtotal resection (STR), 4) STR as well as EBRT, or 5) radiosurgery. Mortality and outcome data were analyzed for time to tumor progression in patients treated with 1 of these 5 treatment modalities. Results Of these 182 patients, 69% had supratentorial ependymomas and 31% presented with infratentorial lesions. Regardless of tumor location or pathological grade, STR was associated with the highest rates of mortality. In contrast, GTR was associated with the lowest rates of mortality, the best overall survival, and the longest PFS. Children with WHO Grade II ependymomas had lower mortality rates when treated more aggressively with GTR. However, patients with WHO Grade III tumors had slightly better survival outcomes after a less aggressive surgical debulking (STR+EBRT) when compared with GTR. Conclusions Mortality, PFS, and overall survival vary in pediatric patients with intracranial ependymomas. Pathological classification, tumor location, and method of treatment play a role in outcomes. In this study, GTR was associated with the best overall and PFS rates. Patients with WHO Grade II tumors had better overall survival after GTR+EBRT and better PFS after GTR alone. Patients with WHO Grade III tumors had better overall survival after STR+EBRT. Patients with infratentorial tumors had improved overall survival compared with those with supratentorial tumors. Progression-free survival was best in those patients with infratentorial tumors following STR+EBRT. Consideration of all of these factors is important when counseling families on treatment options.


2009 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Nagy ◽  
Daniela Schulz-Ertner ◽  
Marc Bischof ◽  
Thomas Welzel ◽  
Holger Hof ◽  
...  

Purpose Patients with anaplastic gliomas have a more favorable overall survival than patients with glioblastomas. In most analyses, WHO grade III and IV tumors are not analyzed separately. The present analysis reports outcome after postoperative radiotherapy in patients with WHO grade III gliomas. Patients and methods Between January 1988 and January 2007, 127 patients with WHO grade III tumors were treated with radiotherapy; the histological classification was pure astrocytoma in 104 patients, oligoastrocytoma in 12 and pure oligodendroglioma in 11 patients. Median age was 48 years. After the primary diagnosis, a biopsy had been performed in 72 patients; subtotal and total resections were performed in 37 and 18 patients, respectively. In all patients radiotherapy was applied with a median dose of 60 Gy in conventional fractionation. The median follow-up time was 18 months. Results Median overall survival was 17 months. Overall survival was significantly influenced by the extent of surgery. Median overall survival was 32 months after complete resection, 36 months after subtotal resection, and 12 months after biopsy. Median overall survival was 7 months for patients with anaplastic astrocytomas, 44 months for patients with mixed tumors, and 47 months for those with pure oligodendrogliomas. Age significantly influenced overall survival. Median progression-free survival was 9 months; the extent of neurosurgical resection significantly influenced progression-free survival. Conclusion Patients with WHO grade III anaplastic astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas show favorable overall survival after postoperative radiotherapy compared with glioblastoma patients and should therefore be analyzed separately. Radiochemotherapy might further improve outcome.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H Press ◽  
Shaakir Hasan ◽  
J Isabelle Choi ◽  
Arpit M Chhabra ◽  
Lia M Halasz ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: The optimal salvage treatment for malignant glioma after prior radiotherapy (RT) is not well established. Proton therapy (PT) is an attractive treatment modality for reirradiation (ReRT) of recurrent disease; however, data are limited.Methods: The prospective, multi-institutional Proton Collaborative Group (PCG) registry was queried for patients with malignant glioma who previously received RT and underwent PT-ReRT between 7/2011-10/2018. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: 109 consecutive patients were identified. Median follow-up was 11.2 months and median time interval (TI) from prior RT (median 59.3 Gy) to PT-ReRT (median 49.6 Gy) was 45.7 months. Primary histology was glioblastoma (n=62), oligodendroglioma (n=26), and astrocytoma (n=20). Median PFS and OS was 6.1 and 11.1 months, respectively. On UVA, improved PFS was associated with oligodendroglioma (HR 0.39) and astrocytoma (HR 0.55) histologies, WHO Grade III (HR 0.36), TI (HR 0.989), surgical resection (HR 0.39), and PT-ReRT dose ≥50 Gy (HR 0.59) (all p<0.03), while improved OS was associated with oligodendroglioma histology (HR 0.35), WHO grade III (HR 0.33), ECOG 0 (HR 0.47), TI (HR 0.985), and PT-ReRT dose ≥50 Gy (HR 0.58) (all p<0.04). Late Grade 3 toxicities occurred in 5.6% of patients with no attributable acute or late Grade 4-5 events.Conclusion: In the largest series of glioma PT-ReRT reported to date, retreatment appears well tolerated with acceptable outcomes and favorable toxicities compared to photon historical controls. Dose escalation achievable with PT may improve outcomes for well-selected patients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2028-2028
Author(s):  
Anna Maria Delios ◽  
Cameron W Brennan ◽  
Jason T. Huse ◽  
Kara Colevas ◽  
Antonio Marcilio Padula Omuro

2028 Background: Salvage treatment with bevacizumab (BEV) has been increasingly used in grade III AG, but limited data are available, with conflicting results reported. Because of differences in molecular characteristics, angiogenesis mechanisms, growth rate and chemosensitivity, results observed in glioblastoma (GBM) treated with BEV may not apply to AG, and may differ between anaplastic astrocytomas (AA) and oligodendrogliomas (AO). Methods: IRB approved retrospective review of all pts with recurrent WHO grade III AG treated with BEV at MSKCC. Response and progression were determined by RANO criteria. Results: BEV was given to 39 pts with recurrent grade III AG (AA: 26; AO: 10; anaplastic oligoastrocytoma [AOA]: 3); median (med) age: 49 (range 20-75); med KPS: 80 (60-100). MGMT promoter methylation was determined in 17 pts (methylated 8, unmethylated 9). Amongst AO/AOA, 1p/19q co-deletion was present in 6 and absent in 5. IDH1/ IDH2 mutations were present in 3/5 tested tumors. Med time from diagnosis of AG to BEV treatment was 11.5m (3 – 112.5). The med number of previous recurrences was 1 (range 1-4). BEV was given as single agent to 16 pts and combined with a cytotoxic agent in 23. Objective response rate (ORR) was 41% (complete response: 5; partial: 11). The med progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.8m (6-m PFS: 35% [95% CI 20-50]). The med overall survival (OS) was 11.5 m (1y-OS: 45% [95% CI 29-61]). In pts achieving ORR, med OS was 13 m vs 4 m in pts with stable/progressive disease (P=0.02). Pts at first recurrence fared better than pts with more than one recurrence (med PFS: 6 vs 3.4 months, P=0.04). AO/AOA tended to fare worse than AA (med PFS 3 vs 5.5 m, P=0.07). There were no differences in PFS (P=0.8) or OS (P=0.4) between single agent vs BEV + cytotoxic agent. Toxicity included one grade 4 brain hemorrhage. Conclusions: In this relatively large series, BEV was associated with higher ORR and PFS as compared to historical controls, although improvements in those endpoints were of a lower magnitude than in GBM. While ORR predicted OS, improvements in OS were not apparent; results in AO were particularly disappointing. The use of BEV in this population requires reappraisal in a randomized study with adequate stratification for histology and number of previous recurrences.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucio De Maria ◽  
Lodovico Terzi di Bergamo ◽  
Alfredo Conti ◽  
Kazuhiko Hayashi ◽  
Valentina Pinzi ◽  
...  

Background and ObjectivePossible treatment strategies for recurrent malignant gliomas include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and combined treatments. Among different reirradiation modalities, the CyberKnife System has shown promising results. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis to establish the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife treatment for recurrent malignant gliomas.MethodsWe searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from 2000 to 2021 for studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of CyberKnife treatment for recurrent WHO grade III and grade IV gliomas of the brain. Two independent reviewers selected studies and abstracted data. Missing information was requested from the authors via email correspondence. The primary outcomes were median Overall Survival, median Time To Progression, and median Progression-Free Survival. We performed subgroup analyses regarding WHO grade and chemotherapy. Besides, we analyzed the relationship between median Time To Recurrence and median Overall Survival from CyberKnife treatment. The secondary outcomes were complications, local response, and recurrence. Data were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis.ResultsThirteen studies reporting on 398 patients were included. Median Overall Survival from initial diagnosis and CyberKnife treatment was 22.6 months and 8.6 months. Median Time To Progression and median Progression-Free Survival from CyberKnife treatment were 6.7 months and 7.1 months. Median Overall Survival from CyberKnife treatment was 8.4 months for WHO grade IV gliomas, compared to 11 months for WHO grade III gliomas. Median Overall Survival from CyberKnife treatment was 4.4 months for patients who underwent CyberKnife treatment alone, compared to 9.5 months for patients who underwent CyberKnife treatment plus chemotherapy. We did not observe a correlation between median Time To Recurrence and median Overall Survival from CyberKnife. Rates of acute neurological and acute non-neurological side effects were 3.6% and 13%. Rates of corticosteroid dependency and radiation necrosis were 18.8% and 4.3%.ConclusionsReirradiation of recurrent malignant gliomas with the CyberKnife System provides encouraging survival rates. There is a better survival trend for WHO grade III gliomas and for patients who undergo combined treatment with CyberKnife plus chemotherapy. Rates of complications are low. Larger prospective studies are warranted to provide more accurate results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document