scholarly journals Pharmacological treatment of Tourette syndrome

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 407-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald L. Gilbert ◽  
Joseph Jankovic
2013 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 143-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veit Roessner ◽  
Katja Schoenefeld ◽  
Judith Buse ◽  
Stephan Bender ◽  
Stefan Ehrlich ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 173-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veit Roessner ◽  
◽  
Kerstin J. Plessen ◽  
Aribert Rothenberger ◽  
Andrea G. Ludolph ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 421-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Rizzo ◽  
Mariangela Gulisano ◽  
Paola V. Calì ◽  
Paolo Curatolo

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1504-1512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanette M. M. M. Debes ◽  
Helle Hjalgrim ◽  
Liselotte Skov

Author(s):  
Veit Roessner ◽  
Heike Eichele ◽  
Jeremy S. Stern ◽  
Liselotte Skov ◽  
Renata Rizzo ◽  
...  

AbstractIn 2011, the European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome (ESSTS) published the first European guidelines for Tourette Syndrome (TS). We now present an update of the part on pharmacological treatment, based on a review of new literature with special attention to other evidence-based guidelines, meta-analyses, and randomized double-blinded studies. Moreover, our revision took into consideration results of a recent survey on treatment preferences conducted among ESSTS experts. The first preference should be given to psychoeducation and to behavioral approaches, as it strengthens the patients’ self-regulatory control and thus his/her autonomy. Because behavioral approaches are not effective, available, or feasible in all patients, in a substantial number of patients pharmacological treatment is indicated, alone or in combination with behavioral therapy. The largest amount of evidence supports the use of dopamine blocking agents, preferably aripiprazole because of a more favorable profile of adverse events than first- and second-generation antipsychotics. Other agents that can be considered include tiapride, risperidone, and especially in case of co-existing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), clonidine and guanfacine. This view is supported by the results of our survey on medication preference among members of ESSTS, in which aripiprazole was indicated as the drug of first choice both in children and adults. In treatment resistant cases, treatment with agents with either a limited evidence base or risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects might be considered, including pimozide, haloperidol, topiramate, cannabis-based agents, and botulinum toxin injections. Overall, treatment of TS should be individualized, and decisions based on the patient’s needs and preferences, presence of co-existing conditions, latest scientific findings as well as on the physician’s preferences, experience, and local regulatory requirements.


2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 265-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Waldon ◽  
Jonathan Hill ◽  
Cristiano Termine ◽  
Umberto Balottin ◽  
Andrea Eugenio Cavanna

Introduction:Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome (GTS) is a childhood-onset hyperkinetic movement disorder defined by the chronic presence of multiple motor tics and at least one vocal tic and often complicated by co-morbid behavioural problems. The pharmacological treatment of GTS focuses on the modulation of monoaminergic pathways within the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuitry. This paper aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of pharmacological agents used in the treatment of tics in patients with GTS, in order to provide clinicians with an evidence-based rationale for the pharmacological treatment in GTS.Method:In order to ascertain the best level of evidence, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify double-blind randomised controlled trials of medications in GTS populations.Results:We identified a large number of pharmacological agents as potentially effective in improving tic symptoms. The alpha-2 agonist Clonidine is amongst the agents with the most favourable efficacy-versus-adverse events ratio, especially in patients with co-morbid attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, although effect sizes vary evidence-based studies.Discussion:Our results are in line with the findings of uncontrolled open-label studies. However, most trials have low statistical power due to the small sample sizes, and newer agents, such as Aripiprazole, have not been formally tested in double-blind randomised controlled trials. Further research should focus on better outcome measures, including Quality of Life instruments.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-249
Author(s):  
Ronja Weiblen ◽  
Melanie Jonas ◽  
Sören Krach ◽  
Ulrike M. Krämer

Abstract. Research on the neural mechanisms underlying Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) has mostly concentrated on abnormalities in basal ganglia circuits. Recent alternative accounts, however, focused more on social and affective aspects. Individuals with GTS show peculiarities in their social and affective domain, including echophenomena, coprolalia, and nonobscene socially inappropriate behavior. This article reviews the experimental and theoretical work done on the social symptoms of GTS. We discuss the role of different social cognitive and affective functions and associated brain networks, namely, the social-decision-making system, theory-of-mind functions, and the so-called “mirror-neuron” system. Although GTS affects social interactions in many ways, and although the syndrome includes aberrant social behavior, the underlying cognitive, affective, and neural processes remain to be investigated.


1991 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 966-967
Author(s):  
R. Arlen Price
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document