scholarly journals A sand production prediction model for weak sandstone reservoir in Kazakhstan

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 760-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ainash Shabdirova ◽  
Nguyen Hop Minh ◽  
Yong Zhao
Geofluids ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Zhan-dong Li ◽  
Hong Pang ◽  
Zhong Li ◽  
Hai-xiang Zhang ◽  
Dian-ju Wang ◽  
...  

Tight oil is an important unconventional resource, and sand production is an inevitable challenge during the field development. In this paper, based on data from the Daqing oilfield in Songliao Basin, the sand production of the tight sandstone oil reservoir is studied from the perspective of seepage and in situ stress distribution. Based on the combination of the formation fluid seepage law and the stress distribution around the well, a sand production prediction model is proposed to quantitatively estimate the sand production rate. The sand production prediction model is built based on the derivation of the sand production rate, which is well validated against the field data in the Daqing field with a relative error of 4.38%.The following conclusions are drawn: (1) after the critical pressure difference is exceeded, the sand production rate is smaller with a higher flowing bottom-hole pressure; (2) a smaller sand production radius makes the formation more unstable and causes a more severe sand production; and (3) various sand production rates exhibit due to different permeabilities. A larger permeability results in a higher sand production rate. The findings of this study can help for sand production prediction in the tight sandstone oil reservoir.


Author(s):  
Mohammad Hossein Shahsavari ◽  
Ehsan Khamehchi ◽  
Vahidoddin Fattahpour ◽  
Hamed Molladavoodi

1989 ◽  
Vol 4 (01) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Morita ◽  
D.L. Whitfill ◽  
I. Massie ◽  
T.W. Knudsen

2012 ◽  
Vol 217-219 ◽  
pp. 2283-2286
Author(s):  
Xiao Peng Zhai ◽  
Yi Shan Lou ◽  
Bao Sheng He ◽  
Hui Ji

Sand and fluid may both run into the wellbore during the production of loose sandstone reservoir, but cavities around the wellbore are prone to form when sand is produced, which makes the casing lost the protection of the formation and casing failure comes about. The limitation of thin cylindrical shell buckling model is analyzed and a mechanical model for casing under sand production is established by M.M.протодьяконоВ’ theory and the pressures of the casing where cavities exist are determined by numerical method. The research shows the cavity height and sand production volume are in a power relationship; the cavity height and axial force are in a linear relationship. With the increase of the overburden pressure, higher steel grade have to be used to keep the reliability of the casing. The research provides theoretical foundation for production casing design and casing strength verification with reasonable sanding.


2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalil Rahman ◽  
Abbas Khaksar ◽  
Toby Kayes

Mitigation of sand production is increasingly becoming an important and challenging issue in the petroleum industry. This is because the increasing demand for oil and gas resources is forcing the industry to expand its production operations in more challenging unconsolidated reservoir rocks and depleted sandstones with more complex well completion architecture. A sand production prediction study is now often an integral part of an overall field development planning study to see if and when sand production will be an issue over the life of the field. The appropriate type of sand control measures and a cost-effective sand management strategy are adopted for the field depending on timing and the severity of predicted sand production. This paper presents a geomechanical modelling approach that integrates production or flow tests history with information from drilling data, well logs and rock mechanics tests. The approach has been applied to three fields in the Australasia region, all with different geological settings. The studies resulted in recommendations for three different well completion and sand control approaches. This highlights that there is no unique solution for sand production problems, and that a robust geomechanical model is capable of finding a field-specific solution considering in-situ stresses, rock strength, well trajectory, reservoir depletion, drawdown and perforation strategy. The approach results in cost-effective decision making for appropriate well/perforation trajectory, completion type (e.g. cased hole, openhole or liner completion), drawdown control or delayed sand control installation. This type of timely decision making often turns what may be perceived as an economically marginal field development scenario into a profitable project. This paper presents three case studies to provide well engineers with guidelines to understanding the principles and overall workflow involved in sand production prediction and minimisation of sand production risk by optimising completion type.


Author(s):  
Nubia Aurora González Molano ◽  
Jacobo Canal Vila ◽  
Héctor González Pérez ◽  
José Alvarellos Iglesias ◽  
M. R. Lakshmikantha

In this study an extensive experimental program has been carried out in order to characterize the mechanical behavior of two weak sandstone formations of an offshore field for application to sand production modeling. The experimental tests included Scratch tests, Triaxial tests and Advanced thick wall cylinder tests (ATWC) where the sand production initiation and the cumulative sand produced were registered. Numerical simulations of experimental tests were then performed using an advanced elasto-plastic constitutive model. Triaxial tests simulations allowed calibrating the constitutive model parameters. These parameters were employed for the numerical simulation of the ATWC in order to determine the equivalent plastic strain threshold required to the onset of sand production observed in laboratory for sanding assessment. Results obtained highlight the importance to use a realistic representation of the rock behavior focusing on post-yield behavior in order to build confidence in model predictions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document