Earthquake relocation, focal mechanism and stress field determination in central Brazil

2020 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 102411
Author(s):  
Juraci M. Carvalho ◽  
Lucas V. Barros ◽  
Jiří Zahradník ◽  
Mônica G. Von Huelsen ◽  
Vinicius Martins Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Stress Field ◽  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Earthquake Relocation ◽  
Central Brazil

Direct stress field estimation through waveform matching

2020 ◽  
Vol 221 (2) ◽  
pp. 843-856
Author(s):  
Wenhuan Kuang ◽  
Jie Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Stress Field ◽  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Stress Pattern ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Local Source ◽  
Stress Inversion ◽  
Inversion Process ◽  
Physical Relationship ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Field Estimation

SUMMARY Conventionally, the routine workflow of stress field estimation from seismic data consists of two steps: focal mechanism inversion and stress inversion. This two-step workflow suffers from the cumulative uncertainties of both the focal mechanism inversion process and the stress inversion process. To mitigate the cumulative errors, a few previous studies have put efforts to directly estimate the stress field using P-wave polarities. In this study, we develop a new approach to directly estimate tectonic stress fields with better accuracy through waveform matching. This new approach combines the two steps into a one-step workflow to mitigate the cumulative uncertainties through the physical relationship between a stress field and the recorded waveforms. This method assumes a homogeneous stress field in space in the local source region and that the fault slip occurs in the direction of the resolved shear stress acting on the fault plane. Under these assumptions, the stress pattern that generates the theoretical waveforms that best fit the waveforms observed is directly retrieved as the true stress field. The merits of the new approach include that this approach can mitigate the cumulative uncertainties suffered from the conventional two-step workflow and does not require determination of the focal mechanisms of each event; thus, this method is applicable to data sets with few stations. Synthetic tests with and without noise are conducted to demonstrate the performance and merits of this method. Then, the new approach is applied to a real data set from central Oklahoma between March 2013 and March 2016. The resulting stress pattern is consistent with that estimated from previous studies examining the same region. These applications show the benefits and validity of the new approach.

Focal mechanism and stress field in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau: insight into layered crustal deformations

2019 ◽  
Vol 218 (3) ◽  
pp. 2066-2078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cunrui Han ◽  
Zhouchuan Huang ◽  
Mingjie Xu ◽  
Liangshu Wang ◽  
Ning Mi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tibetan Plateau ◽  
Stress Field ◽  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
P Wave ◽  
The Tibetan Plateau ◽  
Linear Inversion ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solutions ◽  
Stress Orientations ◽  
Ne Tibetan Plateau

SUMMARY Focal mechanism solutions (FMSs) reflect the stress field underground directly. They provide essential clue for crustal deformations and therefore improve our understanding of tectonic uplift and expansion of the Tibetan Plateau. In this study, we applied generalized Cut and Paste and P-wave first-motion methods to determine 334 FMSs (2.0 ≤ Mw ≤ 6.4) with the data recorded by a new temporary network deployed in the NE Tibetan Plateau by ChinArray project. We then used 1015 FMSs (including 681 published FMSs) to calculate the regional stress field with a damped linear inversion. The results suggest dominant thrust and strike-slip faulting environments in the NE Tibetan Plateau. From the Qilian thrust belt to the Qinling orogen, the maximum horizontal stress orientations (${S_\mathrm{ H}}$) rotate clockwise from NNE to NE, and further to EW, showing a fan-shaped pattern. The derived minimum horizontal stress orientations (${S_\mathrm{ h}}$) are parallel to the aligned fabrics in the mantle lithosphere indicated by shear wave splitting measurements, suggesting vertically coherent deformation in the NE Tibetan Plateau. Beneath the SW Qinling adjacent to the plateau, however, the stress orientations in the shallow and deep crust are different, whereas the deep crustal stress field indicates possible ductile crustal flow or shear.

Focal mechanism and modern stress field along the burmese Arc and its vicinity

1994 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 577-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Ji Li ◽  
Kin-Yip Chen
Keyword(s):  
Stress Field ◽  
Focal Mechanism

Study on Seismicity and Its Geodynamic Genesis in Ngari Areas

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangyin Xu ◽  
Qing Wu ◽  
Suyun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Stress Field ◽  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Seismic Activity ◽  
Tectonic Stress ◽  
Earthquake Catalogue ◽  
Tectonic Stress Field ◽  
Eurasian Plate ◽  
The North ◽  
East Kunlun ◽  
Tectonic Belt

<p>The Ngari area in Tibet is in the forefront of land-continent collisions. The area is accompanied by the polymerization of plates, forming complex structures such as the Tethys Himalayan pleat belt, the Yarlung Zangbo suture belt, and the Gangdese continental margin magma arc from the south to the north. The multi-period dive collision-inland convergence process, the geological structure is complex and the seismicity is very high. Based on the Chinese historical earthquake catalogue, the China Modern Earthquake Catalogue and the seismic data from the International Seismological Center (ISC), we analyzed the seismic activity, focal mechanism and modern tectonic stress field in the Ngari area, and then analyzed the seismicity and its source of geodynamics. The main conclusions are as follows:(1) The seismic activities in the Ngari area are mainly distributed in the Himalayan tectonic belt, the Bangong-Nujiang tectonic belt, the Alkin-East Kunlun tectonic belt, and some near north-south trending tectonic belts; (2) Earthquakes near the Himalayan tectonic belt is dominated by reverse faulting events. The seismic activity near the Bangong-Nujiang tectonic belt and the Alkin-East Kunlun tectonic belt is dominated by strike-slip earthquakes. Near the north-south extensional tectonic belt, the earthquakes show as the normal faulting events. (3) The main direction of the modern tectonic stress field in the study area is near north-south direction; (4) Seismic activity, focal mechanism and modern tectonic stress field show that the geodynamic source in the Ngari region is from Collision and squeezing the between the Eurasian plate and the Indian Ocean plate.</p>

Preliminary Report on the 18 May 2020 Ms 5.0 Qiaojia Earthquake, Yunnan, China

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Fu ◽  
Changsheng Jiang ◽  
Fengling Yin ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Xuanye Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Field ◽  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Earthquake Hazard ◽  
Focal Mechanisms ◽  
Seismogenic Fault ◽  
Coulomb Stress Changes ◽  
Ludian Earthquake ◽  
Moderate Earthquake ◽  
Stress Changes

Abstract The 18 May 2020 Ms 5.0 Qiaojia earthquake occurred in Qiaojia County, Yunnan Province, ∼25  km away from the 3 August 2014 Ms 6.5 Ludian earthquake. This earthquake was well recorded by dense local seismic stations of the Qiaojia array constructed near the Xiaojiang fault zone. The focal mechanism of the mainshock exhibited strike-slip motion with a centroid depth of 8 km. We determined the seismogenic fault of the Qiaojia earthquake using aftershock relocation with local dense seismic arrays. The mainshock is located on a previously unmapped fault. Aftershocks clearly delineated east–west rupture plane, which was not revealed by the regional seismic network due to relatively sparse stations. The length and width of the aftershock zone are ∼5  km and 3 km, respectively. The focal mechanisms of 70 aftershocks with magnitudes ML≥1.0 showed similar focal mechanism with the mainshock. The stress field inverted from focal mechanisms of the aftershocks is consistent with the tectonic stress field. The coseismic and postseismic static coulomb stress changes show that the Ludian earthquake has a negative impact on the Qiaojia earthquake with a value of −0.01  MPa, implying that the Qiaojia earthquake was unlikely statically triggered by the Ludian earthquake. The Qiaojia earthquake sequence was characterized by low b-value and low-decay rate in the aftershock area, indicating high-seismic risk in this region. The dense seismic observation allows us to study the moderate earthquake in detail and provides us with valuable information of near-fault seismicity to analyze earthquake hazard and the potential of large earthquakes in the future.

Study on the crustal stress field of the Tengchong volcanic area using composite focal mechanism method

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-252
Author(s):  
Shu-zhong Sheng ◽  
Yong-ge Wan ◽  
Chang-sheng Jiang ◽  
Xiao-shan Wang ◽  
Shan-shan Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Field ◽  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Volcanic Area ◽  
Crustal Stress ◽  
Composite Focal Mechanism ◽  
Crustal Stress Field

scholarly journals Focal mechanisms and the stress field in the aftershock area of the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi earthquake (MJMA = 6.7)

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Susukida ◽  
◽  
Kei Katsumata ◽  
Masayoshi Ichiyanagi ◽  
Mako Ohzono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Field ◽  
Principal Stress ◽  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Japan Meteorological Agency ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
Reverse Fault ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solutions ◽  
Fault Type ◽  
Aftershock Area

AbstractThe tectonic stress field was investigated in and around the aftershock area of the Hokkaido Eastern Iburi earthquake (MJMA = 6.7) occurred on 6 September 2018. We deployed 26 temporary seismic stations in the aftershock area for approximately 2 months and located 1785 aftershocks precisely. Among these aftershocks, 894 focal mechanism solutions were determined using the first-motion polarity of P wave from the temporary observation and the permanent seismic networks of Hokkaido University, Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), and High Sensitivity Seismograph Network Japan (Hi-net). We found that (1) the reverse faulting and the strike-slip faulting are dominant in the aftershock area, (2) the average trend of P- and T-axes is 78° ± 33° and 352° ± 51°, respectively, and (3) the average plunge of P- and T-axes is 25° ± 16° and 44° ± 20°, respectively: the P-axis is close to be horizontal and the T-axis is more vertical than the average of the P-axes. We applied a stress inversion method to the focal mechanism solutions to estimate a stress field in the aftershock area. As a result, we found that the reverse fault type stress field is dominant in the aftershock area. An axis of the maximum principal stress (σ1) has the trend of 72° ± 7° and the dipping eastward of 19° ± 4° and an axis of the intermediate principal stress (σ2) has the trend of 131° ± 73° and the dipping southward of 10° ± 9°, indicating that both of σ1- and σ2-axes are close to be horizontal. An axis of the minimum principal stress (σ3) has the dipping westward of 67° ± 6° that is close to be vertical. The results strongly suggest that the reverse-fault-type stress field is predominant as an average over the aftershock area which is in the western boundary of the Hidaka Collision Zone. The average of the stress ratio R = (σ1 − σ2)/(σ1 − σ3) is 0.61 ± 0.13 in the whole aftershock area. Although not statistically significant, we suggest that R decreases systematically as the depth is getting deep, which is modeled by a quadratic polynomial of depth.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document