P35.21 Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Lung Metastases in Cancer Patients

281 Background: Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality with a 5-year survival rate of 69%. In this study, we examine the role of integrating CGP, including tissue and liquid biopsy testing, into the clinical management of prostate cancer patients. Methods: We analyzed 140 cases of advanced prostate carcinoma with tissue and ctDNA based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP). CGP analysis revealed genomic alterations (GAs), TMB and MSI status. Germline testing, using multiple commercially assays was also obtained. Results: The median age of patients tested by tissue-based and liquid-based CGP was 65 years (46 to 85 yrs) and 69 years (51 to > 89 years), respectively. CGP analysis of tissue samples revealed the most commonly altered genes to be TP53 (34.6%), TMPRSS2- ERG (25.9%), PTEN (23.5%), NBN (14.8%), MYC (13.6%), BRCA2 (14.3%) and CDKN2A (13.3%). TMB analysis determined in 77 tissue samples showed a median (mean) value of 2.61 (5.00) mutations/Mb. 3.9% cases (3/77) were found to be hypermutated. MSI status was determined in 74 cases of which 2.7% (2/74) were found to be MSI-High. Of the tissue-based samples tested, 30.9% (25/81) were derived from metastatic sites. Analysis of commonly altered genes between primary vs metastatic tissue samples revealed TP53 mutations were significantly enriched in metastatic tumors. CGP analysis of the 59 liquid biopsy samples revealed the most commonly altered genes to be TP53 (37.3%), NF1 (10.2%), ATM (10.2%), CHEK2 (8.5%) and GNAS (8.5%). Germline testing was performed as described above on a clinically indicated subset of patients, which revealed alterations in BRCA, ATM, CHEK2, BRIP1 and TP53, among others. We are evaluating additional patient samples as part of the data set, which will be added to the final abstract presentation with a cutoff date of 12-31-2019. Conclusions: Genomic testing for high risk and advanced prostate cancer patients per the NCCN recommendations, with somatic testing, using tissue and liquid biopsy testing, as well as germline testing in selected cases, identifies DNA alterations which have potential clinical utility for clinical trial enrollment.

Download Full-text

Clinical implications of genomic-directed therapies by comprehensive genomic profiling in breast cancer patients at a large academic cancer center.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e12037 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e12037-e12037

Author(s):

Ricardo Daniel Parrondo ◽

Veronica Mariotti ◽

Miguel Gonzalez Velez ◽

Lori Ann Leslie

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Pik3ca Mutation ◽

Clinical Impact ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Genomic Profiling ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling ◽

Genomic Characterization

e12037 Background: Increased use of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has recently led to improved genomic characterization of tumors, increased access to individualized therapies and increased availability of clinical trials in breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of genomic profiling in breast cancer patients with the use of a CGP assay at a large cancer center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 101 consecutive breast cancer patients who received CGP at the John Theurer Cancer Center between 12/2011 and 08/2016. Genomic alterations (GAs) were identified using the FoundationOne assay (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA). GAs, number of available genomic-directed therapies and number of available clinical trials were reviewed. The CGP interrogated up to 315 genes and introns of 28 genes. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range: 35-83 years). With a median follow-up of 189 months (range 1-189), median survival was 163 months (range 142-184). A total of 560 GAs were found in our population, with a median of 5.0 GAs/sample (range 0-16), a median of 2.0 therapies/patient (range 0-11), and a median of 11.0 clinical trials/patient (range 0-36). The most frequent GAs found were TP53 (47.5%, n = 48), PIK3CA (34.7%, n = 35), MYC (22.8%, n = 23), CCND1 (19.8%, n = 20), FGF3 (16.8%, n = 17), FGF4 (15.8%, n = 16), and ZNF703 (14.9%, n = 15). A significant positive correlation was found between number of GAs and the number of available targeted therapies and clinical trials (r = 0.5 and r = 0.7, p = 0.00, respectively). Increasing age is a predictor of having a PIK3CA mutation (OR = 1.05; CI:1.01-1.09, p = 0.00) while decreasing age is a predictor of having a MYC mutation by logistic regression (OR = 0.95; CI:0.91-0.95, p = 0.03). Conclusions: The systematic use of CGP led to the identification of a high number of GAs, which correlated with a median of 2.0 individualized therapies and a median of 11.0 clinical trials available for breast cancer patients. The clinical impact of genomic-directed individualized therapies needs to be further investigated in prospective, randomized studies.

Download Full-text

Clinical and analytical validation of FoundationOne Liquid CDx, a novel 324-gene blood-based comprehensive genomic profiling assay.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e13685 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e13685-e13685 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ryan Woodhouse ◽

Lucas Dennis ◽

Meijuan Li ◽

Christine Burns ◽

Pei Ma ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cancer Patients ◽

Copy Number ◽

Limit Of Detection ◽

Variant Calling ◽

Genomic Profiling ◽

Validity Data ◽

Multiple Tumor ◽

Additional Tool ◽

Therapeutic Decisions ◽

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling

e13685 Background: As the availability of precision therapies expand, a well-validated blood-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay has the potential to provide considerable value as a complement to tissue-based testing to ensure that potentially life-extending therapies are administered to the patients most likely to benefit. Comprehensive clinical and analytical validity data for blood-based assays are crucial to enabling physicians to understand the true performance of available testing options. Methods: The FoundationOne Liquid CDx assay is a blood-based CGP assay that has been validated for a Premarket Approval (PMA) submission to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Validation studies included > 9,000 tests and > 30,000 unique variants across > 300 genes and > 50 cancer types, allowing for a comprehensive assessment of performance. Results: The results of these extensive studies demonstrate a 95% limit of detection (LoD) of 0.40% variant allele fraction (VAF) for select short variants (subs and indels), 0.37% VAF for select rearrangements, 21.7% tumor fraction (TF) for select copy number amplifications, and 30.4% TF for copy number losses. LoD for complex biomarkers such as microsatellite instability (MSI) and blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) were also determined. The limit of blank (LoB) was shown to be the ideal value of zero. Reproducibility of variant calling was determined to be 99.59% with two-sided exact CI of (99.58%, 99.60%). In comparison with an orthogonal method, an overall PPA (95% CI) of 96.3% (94.8, 97.4%) and NPA (95% CI) of > 99.9% (99.9%, 100.0%) was observed. Critically, clinical validity and concordance with tissue-based CGP results across multiple tumor types were also evaluated. Conclusions: The results of these studies demonstrate that FoundationOne Liquid CDx accurately and reproducibly detects the major types of genomic alterations (short variants, rearrangements, and copy number alterations), as well as complex biomarkers, such as MSI, bTMB, and tumor fraction. These data demonstrate that the assay can identify genomic variants that may inform therapeutic decisions for cancer patients with any solid tumor using a single blood sample. Additionally, clinical validation results establish FoundationOne Liquid CDx as an additional tool for physicians in the therapeutic management of cancer patients.

Download Full-text