scholarly journals Changing Of Prescriptions For Diabetes, Hyperlipidemia, And Hypertension, From Generic Drugs To Protected Brand Drugs : A Retrospective Cohort Study Using A National Inpatient Database In Japan

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. A452-A453
Author(s):  
S Shimizu
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Hayashi ◽  
Yusuke Sasabuchi ◽  
Hiroki Matsui ◽  
Mikio Nakajima ◽  
Hiroyuki Ohbe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Cytokine removal therapy is one of the available therapies for sepsis. Acrylonitrile-co-methallyl sulfonate surface-treated (AN69ST, sepXiris®) membrane has cytokine adsorption capacity and has been widely used for treating sepsis in Japan. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with AN69ST membrane and conventional CRRT for patients with pneumonia-associated sepsis.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. We identified adult patients who were hospitalized due to pneumonia and received CRRT within 2 days of admission from September 2014 to March 2017. We included patients who received CRRT with AN69ST membrane within 2 days of admission in the treatment group (AN69ST group); those who received CRRT with other membranes within 2 days of admission were included in the control group (non-AN69ST group). Propensity score matching was used to compare in-hospital mortality between the two groups.Results: Eligible patients (n=2,393) were categorized into the AN69ST group (n=631) or the non-AN69ST group (n=1,762). The overall in-hospital mortality rate in pneumonia patients treated with CRRT was 38.9%. Propensity score matching created a matched cohort of 545 pairs of patients. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in the AN69ST group than in the non-AN69ST group (35.8 vs. 41.8%, p=0.046).Conclusion: Our data suggest that CRRT with the AN69ST membrane was associated with a significantly lower in-hospital mortality than CRRT with standard membranes among patients with pneumonia-associated sepsis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (698) ◽  
pp. e636-e643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian MacKenna ◽  
Helen J Curtis ◽  
Alex J Walker ◽  
Seb Bacon ◽  
Richard Croker ◽  
...  

BackgroundElectronic health record (EHR) systems are used by clinicians to record patients’ medical information, and support clinical activities such as prescribing. In England, healthcare professionals are advised to ‘prescribe generically’ because generic drugs are usually cheaper than branded alternatives, and have fixed reimbursement costs. ‘Ghost-branded generics’ are a new category of medicines savings, caused by prescribers specifying a manufacturer for a generic product, often resulting in a higher reimbursement price compared with the true generic.AimTo describe time trends and practice factors associated with excess medication costs from ghost-branded generic prescribing.Design and settingRetrospective cohort study of English GP prescribing data and EHR deployment data.MethodA retrospective cohort study was conducted, based on data from the OpenPrescribing.net database from May 2013 to May 2019. Total spending on ghost-branded generics across England was calculated, and excess spend on ghost-branded generics calculated as a percentage of all spending on generics for every CCG and general practice in England, for every month in the study period.ResultsThere were 31.8 million ghost-branded generic items and £9.5 million excess cost in 2018, compared with 7.45 million ghost-branded generic items and £1.3 million excess cost in 2014. Most excess costs were associated with one EHR, SystmOne, and it was identified that SystmOne offered ghost-branded generic options as the default. After informing the vendor, the authors monitored for subsequent change in costs, and report a rapid decrease in ghost-branded generic expenditure.ConclusionA design choice in a commonly used EHR has led to £9.5 million in avoidable excess prescribing costs for the NHS in 1 year. Notifying the vendor led to a change in user interface and a rapid, substantial spend reduction. This finding illustrates that EHR user interface design has a substantial impact on the quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness of clinical practice; this should be a priority for quantitative research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document