scholarly journals PSU32 INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING OF TIBIAL FRACTURES: PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S897
Author(s):  
A.S. Chitnis ◽  
J. Ruppenkamp ◽  
M. Vanderkarr ◽  
C. Sparks ◽  
Y. Grebenyuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Tibial Fractures

scholarly journals PIT15 INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING OF HUMERAL FRACTURES: PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S667
Author(s):  
A.S. Chitnis ◽  
J. Ruppenkamp ◽  
M. Vanderkarr ◽  
C. Sparks ◽  
Y. Grebenyuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Humeral Fractures

scholarly journals Intramedullary Nailing of Paediatric Tibial Fractures: Comparison between Flexible and Rigid Nails

2020 ◽  
pp. 145749692095862
Author(s):  
S. Widbom-Kolhanen ◽  
I. Helenius
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Intramedullary Nail ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nail ◽  
Flexible Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Several Variables ◽  
Elastic Intramedullary Nailing

Purpose: To describe patient characteristics and to compare outcomes of children undergoing rigid intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures as compared with those operated on using elastic intramedullary nailing. Methods: A retrospective review of 26 children who have undergone flexible intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures and 30 children with rigid nailing at our university hospital between 2008 and 2017. The patient charts and radiographs were evaluated to identify demographic characteristics and several variables were measured preoperatively, as well as 6–12 weeks postoperatively in addition to final follow-up radiographs. Results: Twenty-six patients (26/26, 100%) treated with a flexible nail and 14 patients (14/30, 46.7%) treated with a rigid nail had open proximal tibial physis (p < 0.001). An acceptable postoperative alignment was obtained in 20 patients (20/26, 76.9%) in the elastic stable intramedullary nail group and in 29 patients (29/30, 96.7%) in the rigid group (p = 0.026). Some complications occurred in four patients (4/26, 15%) in the elastic stable intramedullary nail population and seven patients (7/30, 23%) in the rigid intramedullary nail population (p = 0.46). Malunion occurred in six patients (6/26, 23%) in the elastic stable intramedullary nail group and in none of the patients treated with a rigid intramedullary nail (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Younger children with tibial fractures who weight 50 kg or less and with proximal tibial growth plates wide open can be treated with elastic stable intramedullary nail while more mature adolescents benefit from rigid intramedullary nailing.

scholarly journals PSU23 INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING OF FEMORAL FRACTURES: PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S896
Author(s):  
A.S. Chitnis ◽  
J. Ruppenkamp ◽  
M. Vanderkarr ◽  
C. Sparks ◽  
Y. Grebenyuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Patient Characteristics

scholarly journals Reamed intramedullary nailing versus circular frame external fixation for segmental tibial fractures (STIFF-F): a mixed methods feasibility study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline B. Hing ◽  
Elizabeth Tutton ◽  
Toby O. Smith ◽  
Molly Glaze ◽  
Jamie R. Stokes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Tibial Fracture ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Circular Frame ◽  
Pilot Rct ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background Segmental tibial fractures are fractures in two or more areas of the tibial diaphysis resulting in a separate intercalary segment of the bone. Surgical fixation is recommended for patients with segmental tibial fractures as non-operative treatment outcomes are poor. The most common surgical interventions are intramedullary nailing (IMN) and circular frame external fixation (CFEF), but evidence about which is better is of poor quality. An adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine optimum treatment is required. STIFF-F aimed to assess the feasibility of a multicentre RCT comparing IMN with CFEF for segmental tibial fracture. Methods STIFF-F was a mixed-methods feasibility study comprising a pilot RCT conducted at six UK Major Trauma Centres, qualitative interviews drawing on Phenomenology and an online survey of rehabilitation. The primary outcome was recruitment rate. Patients, 16 years and over, with a segmental tibial fracture (open or closed) deemed suitable for IMN or CFEF were eligible to participate. Randomisation was stratified by site using random permuted blocks of varying sizes. Participant or assessor blinding was not possible. Interviews were undertaken with patients about their experience of injury, treatment, recovery and participation. Staff were interviewed to identify contextual factors affecting trial processes, their experience of recruitment and the treatment pathway. An online survey was developed to understand the rehabilitation context of the treatments. Results Eleven patients were screened and three recruited to the pilot RCT. Nineteen staff and four patients participated in interviews, and 11 physiotherapists responded to the survey. This study found the following: (i) segmental tibial fractures were rarer than anticipated, (ii) the complexity of the injury, study setup times and surgeon treatment preferences impeded recruitment, (iii) recovery from a segmental tibial fracture is challenging, and rehabilitation protocols are inconsistent and (iv) despite the difficulty recruiting, staff valued this research question and strived to find a way forward. Conclusion The proposed multicentre RCT comparing IMN with CFEF is not feasible. This study highlighted the difficulty of recruiting patients to an RCT of a complex rare injury over a short time period. Trial registration The study was registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registry: ISRCTN11229660

Higher-Than-Expected Rates of Distal Radioulnar Joint Fixation in Radial Shaft Fractures: Location of Fracture Matters

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472110068
Author(s):  
Joanne Y. Zhang ◽  
Aneesh V. Samineni ◽  
David C. Sing ◽  
Alyssa Rothman ◽  
Andrew B. Stein
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Distal Radioulnar Joint ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Radioulnar Joint ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Male Sex ◽  
Preoperative Patient

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) fixation based on location of the radial shaft fracture and risk factors associated with postoperative complications following radial shaft open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Methods: Adult patients who underwent isolated radial shaft ORIF from 2014 to 2018 were identified from American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and stratified by fracture location and by the presence or absence of DRUJ fixation. Preoperative patient characteristics and postoperative complications were compared to determine risk factors associated with DRUJ fixation. Results: We identified 1517 patients who underwent isolated radial shaft ORIF, of which 396 (26.1%) underwent DRUJ fixation. Preoperative patient characteristics and postoperative complications were similar between cohorts. Distal radioulnar joint fixation was performed in 50 (30.7%) of 163 distal radial shaft fractures, 191 (21.8%) of 875 midshaft fractures, and 3 (13.0%) of 23 proximal shaft fractures ( P = .025). Risk factors for patients readmitted include male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 12.76, P = .009) and older age (OR = 4.99, P = .035). Risk factors for patients with any postoperative complication include dependent functional status (OR = 6.78, P = .02), older age (50-69 vs <50) (OR = 2.73, P = .05), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) ≥3 (OR = 2.45, P = .047). Conclusions: The rate of DRUJ fixation in radial shaft ORIF exceeded previously reported rates of concomitant DRUJ injury, especially among distal radial shaft fractures. More distally located radial shaft fractures are significantly associated with higher rates of DRUJ fixation. Male sex is a risk factor for readmission, whereas dependent functional status, older age, and ASA ≥3 are risk factors for postoperative complications.

scholarly journals Intramedullary Nailing Supplemented with Poller Screws for Proximal Tibial Fractures

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil G Kulkarni ◽  
Ankit Varshneya ◽  
Shreenath Kulkarni ◽  
Govind S Kulkarni ◽  
Milind G Kulkarni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Proximal Tibial Fractures

scholarly journals Distal Tibia Metaphyseal Fractures: Which is Better, Intra-medullary Nailing or Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis?

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-71
Author(s):  
Kawalkar Abhijit Chandrakant ◽  
Badole Chandrashekher Martand
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Distal Tibia ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Early Weight Bearing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Tibia Fractures ◽  
Distal Tibia Fractures

Introduction Tibia fractures are the most common long bone fractures encountered by the orthopedic surgeons and distal tibia fractures have the second highest incidence of all tibia fractures after the middle third of tibia the distal tibial fractures are unique and are considered as most challenging fractures to treat due to its proximity to the ankle joint and its superficial nature. The objective of this study is to compare two osteosynthesis systems developed for surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures: the intramedullary nailing and the MIPPO technique. Methods The study was conducted between Jan 2011 to Dec 2012. 63 patients with extra-articular distal tibia fracture treated with intramedullary nailing and MIPPO technique were reviewed retrospectively and clinical outcome was evaluated according to American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score. Results 31 patients were treated with intramedullary nail & 32 with MIPPO technique. Fibular fixation was done in cases where fibular fracture was at or below the level of tibial fractures. We found no difference in terms of time for fracture union, mal-union, non-union, duration of surgery and amount of blood loss. But there was significant difference in terms of infection and duration of hospital stay. Also weight bearing was possible much earlier in intramedullary group as compared to the MIPPO group. Conclusion Thus we conclude that intramedullary nailing is better choice of implant in patients with extra- articular distal tibia fractures & helps in early weight bearing and ambulation of patient with fewer complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document