scholarly journals PC116. Medical Student Interest Groups: The Future of 0-5 Success

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. e205-e206
Author(s):  
Cassius I. Ochoa Chaar ◽  
Anand Brahmandam ◽  
Navid Gholitabar ◽  
Yawei Zhang ◽  
XiaoXu Wang ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. E11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan A. Lieber ◽  
Taylor A. Wilson ◽  
Randy S. Bell ◽  
William W. Ashley ◽  
Daniel L. Barrow ◽  
...  

Indirect costs of the interview tour can be prohibitive. The authors sought to assess the desire of interviewees to mitigate these costs through ideas such as sharing hotel rooms and transportation, willingness to stay with local students, and the preferred modality to coordinate this collaboration. A survey link was posted on the Uncle Harvey website and the Facebook profile page of fourth-year medical students from 6 different medical schools shortly after the 2014 match day. There were a total of 156 respondents to the survey. The majority of the respondents were postinterview medical students (65.4%), but preinterview medical students (28.2%) and current residents (6.4%) also responded to the survey. Most respondents were pursuing a field other than neurosurgery (75.0%) and expressed a desire to share a hotel room and/or transportation (77.4%) as well as stay in the dorm room of a medical student at the program in which they are interviewing (70.0%). Students going into neurosurgery were significantly more likely to be interested in sharing hotel/transportation (89.2% neurosurgery vs 72.8% nonneurosurgery; p = 0.040) and in staying in the dorm room of a local student when on interviews (85.0% neurosurgery vs 57.1% nonneurosurgery; p = 0.040) than those going into other specialties. Among postinterview students, communication was preferred to be by private, email identification–only chat room. Given neurosurgery resident candidates' interest in collaborating to reduce interview costs, consideration should be given to creating a system that could allow students to coordinate cost sharing between interviewees. Moreover, interviewees should be connected to local students from neurosurgery interest groups as a resource.


2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-160
Author(s):  
C. M. Lang ◽  
Danielle McNicholas ◽  
Mitchell P. Wilson ◽  
Angus Hartery ◽  
L. J. Probyn ◽  
...  

Background: Radiology interest groups (RIGs) can serve as a means of increasing exposure of the radiology specialty early in the medical curriculum while also increasing educational opportunities. However, the organizational structure and various functions of individual RIGs in Canada are not well-documented. We performed a survey of all active RIGs in Canada for the purpose of better understanding their structure, function, and opportunities for improvement. Methods: A 21-question survey was sent to current or recent former medical student leaders of all active RIGs in Canada during the 2016-2017 academic year. Results: Radiology interest groups were identified in 88% (15/17) of Canadian medical schools. We received a 100% (15/15) response rate. Events held by RIGs consist mostly of lunch and learns (67%, 10/15), career panels (53%, 8/15), networking events (40%, 6/15), and curriculum-related events (40%, 6/15). General mentorship (93%, 13/14), shadowing opportunities (86%, 12/14), and research mentorship (63%, 8/14) were most often cited in their top 3 choices for opportunities for improvement. Sixty-six percent indicated that if a radiology society were to host a page for their interest group, they would be interested in posting content and/or links. Conclusions: Canadian RIGs offer increased early awareness and education about radiology in the medical curriculum. Radiology departments can facilitate improvement in Canadian RIGs through targeted institutional mentorship, research opportunities, and shadowing programs for their members.


2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhukar S. Patel ◽  
Bhavraj Khalsa ◽  
Asheen Rama ◽  
Fariba Jafari ◽  
Ara Salibian ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Yeung ◽  
Amy Bombay ◽  
Chad Walker ◽  
Jeff Denis ◽  
Debbie Martin ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 960-961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shona L. Ray-Griffith ◽  
Lewis Krain ◽  
Erick Messias ◽  
Kirsten M. Wilkins

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. e367-e374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Burford ◽  
John Hanrahan ◽  
Ali Ansaripour ◽  
Brandon Smith ◽  
Katie Sysum ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Periyadi Peri ◽  
Sri Bulkia Sri Bulkia ◽  
Risnawati Risnawati

: The main objective in this research is to study and analyze (1) How entrepreneurial factors consisting of social and family environment, innovation and creative, and technological environment influence the interest in entrepreneurship. (2) How does the social and family environment influence the interests of entrepreneurship. (3) How the influence of innovation and creativity on entrepreneurial interest. (4) How is the influence of the technological environment on entrepreneurial interest. The targets in this study include (1) the results of these researchers can be input for other researchers to conduct similar studies in the future. (2) Input materials can be used to enhance the development of student interest in entrepreneurship. (3) The results of this study are expected to be used as evaluations and useful information to make improvements oriented to the future, especially on students' interest in entrepreneurship. This research was conducted with quantitative methods and using analysis methods with SPSS Windows For Data as a data analysis tool.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document