scholarly journals Capitalizing on a teachable moment: Development of a targeted self-help smoking cessation intervention for patients receiving lung cancer screening

Lung Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren R. Meltzer ◽  
Marina Unrod ◽  
Vani N. Simmons ◽  
Karen O. Brandon ◽  
Bárbara Piñeiro ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 703-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte J. Hagerman ◽  
Catherine A. Tomko ◽  
Cassandra A. Stanton ◽  
Jenna A. Kramer ◽  
David B. Abrams ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Pozzi ◽  
Elena Munarini ◽  
Francesca Bravi ◽  
Marta Rossi ◽  
Carlo La Vecchia ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasmeena Kathuria ◽  
Elisa Koppelman ◽  
Belinda Borrelli ◽  
Christopher G Slatore ◽  
Jack A Clark ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Little is known about whether patients and physicians perceive lung cancer screening (LCS) as a teachable moment to promote smoking cessation or the degree to which physicians in “real world” settings link LCS discussions with smoking cessation counseling. We sought to characterize patient and physician perspectives of discussions about smoking cessation during LCS. Methods We conducted a qualitative study (interviews and focus groups) with 21 physicians and 28 smokers screened in four diverse hospitals. Transcripts were analyzed for characteristics of communication about smoking cessation and LCS, the perceived effect on motivation to quit smoking, the degree to which physicians leverage LCS as a teachable moment to promote smoking cessation, and suggestions to improve patient–physician communication about smoking cessation in the context of LCS. Results Patients reported that LCS made them more cognizant of the health consequences of smoking, priming them for a teachable moment. While physicians and patients both acknowledged that smoking cessation counseling was frequent, they described little connection between their discussions regarding LCS and smoking cessation counseling. Physicians identified several barriers to integrating discussions on smoking cessation and LCS. They volunteered communication strategies by which LCS could be leveraged to promote smoking cessation. Conclusions LCS highlights the harms of smoking to patients who are chronic, heavy smokers and thus may serve as a teachable moment for promoting smoking cessation. However, this opportunity is typically missed in clinical practice. Implications LCS highlights the harms of smoking to heavily addicted smokers. Yet both physicians and patients reported little connection between LCS and tobacco treatment discussions due to multiple barriers. On-site tobacco treatment programs and post-screening messaging tailored to the LCS results are needed to maximize the health outcomes of LCS, including smoking quit rates and longer-term smoking-related morbidity and mortality.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1484-1491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Pistelli ◽  
Ferruccio Aquilini ◽  
Fabio Falaschi ◽  
Donella Puliti ◽  
Cristina Ocello ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Changes in smoking habits and predictors of smoking cessation were examined in the randomized ITALUNG lung cancer screening trial. Methods In three centers, eligible smokers or ex-smokers (55–69 years, ≥20 pack-years in the last 10 years) were randomized to receive annual invitation for low-dose computed tomography for 4 years or usual care. At invitation, subjects received written information for a free smoking cessation program. Quitting outcome was assessed at year 4. Results Among participants who completed baseline assessments and year 4 screening, higher quitting (20.8% vs. 16.7%, p = .029) and lower relapse (6.41% vs. 7.56%, p = .50) rates were observed in the active screening group as compared to the usual-care control group. Corresponding figures in the intention-to-treat analysis were as follows: 16.04% versus 14.64% (p = .059) and 4.88% versus 6.43% (p = .26). Quitting smoking was significantly associated to male gender, lower pack-years, and having pulmonary nodules at baseline. Center-specific analyses showed a threefold statistically significant higher probability to quit associated with participating in the smoking cessation program. A subsample of smokers of the scan group from one center showed higher quitting rates over 12-month follow-up as compared to matched controls from the general population who underwent the same smoking cessation program. Conclusions Consistently with previous reports, in the ITALUNG trial, screened subjects showed significantly higher quit rates than controls, and higher quit rates were associated with both the presence of pulmonary nodules and participating in a smoking cessation program. Maximal effect on quitting outcome was observed with the participation in the smoking cessation program. Implications Participating in lung cancer screening promotes smoking cessation. An effective “teachable moment” may be achieved when the smoking cessation intervention is structured as integral part of the screening clinical visits and conducted by a dedicated team of health care professionals. Standardized guidelines for smoking cessation interventions in lung cancer screening are needed.


1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen M. McBride ◽  
Delia Scholes ◽  
Louis C. Grothaus ◽  
Susan J. Curry ◽  
Evette Ludman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document