scholarly journals Unraveling the potential of cryotolerant Saccharomyces eubayanus in Chardonnay white wine production

LWT ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 110183
Author(s):  
Giuseppina Paola Parpinello ◽  
Arianna Ricci ◽  
Barbara Folegatti ◽  
Francesca Patrignani ◽  
Rosalba Lanciotti ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Alina Donici ◽  
Florin Dumitru Bora ◽  
Aurel Ciubuca ◽  
Viorica Enache ◽  
Gabriel Tabaranu

The  degree of fertility coefficient absoltul (CFA) and coefficient ratio (CFR) we can see that the highest values were obtained from the variety 'Fetească regală' (54.5 ± 1.00% fertility; 1.60 ± 1.00 coefficient absolute (CFA ) and 0.86 ± 1.00 coefficinet relative (CFR). The  analysis of physical-mechanical based on the results it can be seen that the variety 'Bujoru' showed the best values for all parameters analyzed (303.5 ± 1.0 (g) the average weight of the grape bunch, 278.07 ± 1.0 (g) weight of 100 berries; 213.66 ± 0.67 (g / L) sucrose sugar concent and 4.331 ± 1.0 (kg / comes) average coming production). 


2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Artiga ◽  
M. Carballa ◽  
J.M. Garrido ◽  
R. Méndez

Wine production is seasonal, and thus the wastewater flow and its chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentrations greatly vary during the vintage and non-vintage periods, as well as being dependant on the winemaking technologies used, e.g. red, white or special wines production. Due to this seasonal high variability in terms of organic matter load, the use of membrane biological reactors (MBR) could be suitable for the treatment of such wastewaters. MBR offers several benefits, such as rapid start up, good effluent quality, low footprint area, absence of voluminous secondary settler and its operation is not affected by the settling properties of the sludge. A pilot scale hollow fibre MBR system of 220 L was fed by adequately diluting white wine with tap water, simulating wastewaters generated in wineries. The COD in the influent ranged between 1,000 and 4,000 mg/L. In less than 10 days after the start up, the system showed a good COD removal efficiency. The COD elimination percentage was always higher than 97% regardless of the organic loading rate (OLR) applied (0.5–2.2 kg COD/m3 d), with COD concentrations in the effluent ranging between 20 and 100 mg/L. Although the biomass concentration in the reactor increased from 0.5 to 8.6 g VSS/L, the suspended solids concentration in the effluent was negligible. Apparent biomass yield was estimated in 0.14 g VSS/g COD.


1981 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 203-206
Author(s):  
A. DOBOŠ ◽  
M. ORSZÁGOVÁ

2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Fernández ◽  
I. Seijo ◽  
G. Ruiz-Filippi ◽  
E. Roca ◽  
L. Tarenzi ◽  
...  

During a 16 months period, the characteristics of the wastewaters generated in a Rias Baixas winery (Spain) producing white wine were determined: The characterization study showed that white wine wastewater had an average CODt and TSS values of 7.3 and 5.2 kg/m3, respectively being the ratio wastewater/wine produced of about 1.6–2.0 L/L and the ratio between load pollution and produced wine of 9.7 kgCODt/m3WINE. A strategy for the management of wastes and wastewaters allowed for an important reduction of a 55% of wastewater generation to be achieved. In order to select a suitable technology for the treatment of wastewaters two configurations were tested at pilot scale: i) An Anaerobic Filter (AF) of 430 L followed by an activated sludge unit of 510 L and: ii) one activated sludge unit of 510 L. The results showed that the anaerobic/aerobic configuration was more flexible as it adapted quickly to the different loads and flows produced during the different phases through the year. Besides it allowed higher COD removals (98.5–99.2%) to be achieved and proved to permit a quicker re-start up after starvation periods.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Barril ◽  
D.N. Rutledge ◽  
G.R. Scollary ◽  
A.C. Clark

Author(s):  
Renata Černíková ◽  
Pavel Žufan

The paper analyzes the current situation and the development in the wine production sector in the Germany and compares it with the situation in the wine production sector in the Czech Republic. The aim is to find identical trends and differences in the production and consumption of wine and foreign trade with wine in the both countries. The aim also is to define the main opportunities and threats for German wine producers in the Czech market and for Czech wineries in the German market.The domestic production is not able to cover the domestic consumption of wine in the both analyzed countries that is why wine is necessary to import. The domestic production covered only 52% of the domestic consumption in the Germany and only 41% of the domestic consumption in the Czech Republic in the analyzed years on average. The proportion in the production of red and white wine is identical in the Germany and in the Czech Republic as well (in the Germany in 2002 white wine 65%, red wine 35%; in the CR white wine 72%, red wine 28%). There is also the unbalanced foreign trade with wine in the both countries.The main difference of the Germany and the Czech wine market is possible to find in the size of the both markets. The German wine market is twelve times bigger according to the total consumption volume; the average annual consumption of wine varied about 24 litres per inhabitant. In the Czech Republic the wine consumption was increasing in the last 10 years, though the average year consumption of wine was only 14 litres per inhabitant in 2002.In contrast to the Czech Republic the Germany has very high stocks of wine (in 2001/2002 the wine stock was 14765 thousand hectolitres; 74% of domestic consumption), and very high share (94% in 2002) of the merging wine on the total production as well.The paper is a part of solution of the grant awarded by the Ministry of agriculture (NAZV) No. QF 3276 and it focuses on environmental analysis of the wine-production industry in the Czech Republic.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-87
Author(s):  
Zorana Rončević ◽  
Jovana Đuran ◽  
Bojana Bajić ◽  
Vladimir Puškaš ◽  
Uroš Miljić ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document