scholarly journals Advance Care Planning in the Elderly

2015 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hillary D. Lum ◽  
Rebecca L. Sudore ◽  
David B. Bekelman
2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-375
Author(s):  
Munther M. Queisi ◽  
Suheil Albert Atallah-Yunes ◽  
Farah Adamali ◽  
Nageshwar Jonnalagadda ◽  
Vida Rastegar ◽  
...  

Background: Frailty has important implications for the care of the elderly and how their needs are met. Objective: To assess clinicians’ acknowledgement of frailty in the electronic medical records (EMR) and the impact of frailty recognition on advance care planning (ACP). Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 119 patients 65 years or older with moderate or severe frailty assessed using a validated frailty scale. We reviewed notes to determine if primary team identified frailty and obtained data regarding ACP planning. We present the characteristics and outcomes of patients who were identified as frail and compared them with patients whose frailty was unrecognized in EMR. Results: Among the 119 frail patients, one third were ≥85 years and one-year mortality was 25.4%. Most patients were taking ≥5 medications and only 14.3% rated their health as excellent or good prior to hospitalization. Only 15 patients (12.6%) were identified as frail in the EMR. The only significant differences between those recognized versus unrecognized frail were body mass index (23.4 vs 28.6, p = 0.02) and reported weight loss in the 3 months prior to admission (93.3% vs 59.6%, p = 0.009). Geriatric or palliative care consults, and changes in code status to do-not resuscitate were more frequent among those recognized vs not. (33.3% vs 11.5%; 13.3% vs 1.9% respectively). Conclusion: Documentation of frailty in the EMR was rare and it was associated with a lower likelihood of providing advance care planning. These findings suggest a need for consistent frailty assessment, which might promote patient-centered care.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gawin Tsai ◽  
Donald H Taylor

ObjectiveIn this study, we examined the US Medicare programme’s (government-funded social insurance for the elderly or disabled) new reimbursement for advance care planning (ACP) that began on 1 January 2016. This single-centre study addressed whether clinicians who have ACP conversations with patients will use the new reimbursement code and if the new reimbursement is successful at motivating clinicians to have more ACP conversations with patients.MethodsThis is a multimethod study. To gain a general sense of ACP practice and code visibility, we first surveyed 493 clinicians in a large academic medical centre (20% response rate). Then, for more in-depth answers and to illuminate the reasons behind survey findings, we conducted semistructured interviews with 28 physicians.ResultsWe found that while clinicians are open to using the reimbursement codes, organisational barriers such as low visibility and documentation make it difficult for clinicians to bill for ACP. Moreover, structural and professional factors have rendered Medicare’s ACP reimbursement largely ineffective at motivating healthcare providers to perform more ACP conversations during the first 3 months of this policy.ConclusionsIt does not appear that Medicare’s reimbursement of ACP has made a significant, direct impact on ACP billing or practice during the policy’s first 90 days. However, there is a symbolic role that this change can serve, and the policy could have more impact as its existence becomes more widely known. Barriers to ACP that we identify should be addressed directly to expand the use of ACP.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e040999
Author(s):  
Joshua R Lakin ◽  
Elise N Brannen ◽  
James A Tulsky ◽  
Michael K Paasche-Orlow ◽  
Charlotta Lindvall ◽  
...  

IntroductionAdvance care planning (ACP) is associated with improved health outcomes for patients with cancer, and its absence is associated with unfavourable outcomes for patients and their caregivers. However, older adults do not complete ACP at expected rates due to patient and clinician barriers. We present the original design, methods and rationale for a trial aimed at improving ACP for older patients with advanced cancer and the modified protocol in response to changes brought by the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods and analysisThe Advance Care Planning: Promoting Effective and Aligned Communication in the Elderly study is a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial examining a Comprehensive ACP Program. The programme combines two complementary evidence-based interventions: clinician communication skills training (VitalTalk) and patient video decision aids (ACP Decisions). We will implement the programme at 36 oncology clinics across three unique US health systems. Our primary outcome is the proportion of eligible patients with ACP documentation completed in the electronic health record. Our secondary outcomes include resuscitation preferences, palliative care consultations, death, hospice use and final cancer-directed therapy. From a subset of our patient population, we will collect surveys and video-based declarations of goals and preferences. We estimate 11 000 patients from the three sites will be enrolled in the study.Ethics and disseminationRegulatory and ethical aspects of this trial include Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval via single IRB of record mechanism at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Data Use Agreements among partners and a Data Safety and Monitoring Board. We plan to present findings at national meetings and publish the results.Trial registration numberNCT03609177; Pre-results.


2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf J. Jox ◽  
Francesca Bosisio ◽  
Eve Rubli Truchard

Zusammenfassung. Die Palliative Care muss sich im Zuge des demographischen Wandels vieler Gesellschaften rund um den Globus tiefgreifend wandeln. Sie muss mehr und mehr mit der Geriatrie zusammenarbeiten und geriatrische Expertise integrieren. Eine der zentralen Herausforderungen Geriatrischer Palliative Care ist die ethisch angemessene Therapieentscheidung für Menschen, die nicht mehr urteilsfähig sind. Nachdem der bisherige Ansatz herkömmlicher Patientenverfügungen erwiesenermassen enttäuscht hat, wird aktuell, gerade auch in deutschsprachigen Ländern, das systemische Konzept des Advance Care Planning (ACP) verfolgt. In diesem Artikel wird zunächst ACP mit seinen Zielen, Elementen und Effekten vorgestellt. Sodann wird gezeigt, weshalb es für Menschen mit Demenz eines adaptierten ACP-Programms bedarf und was ein solches demenzspezifisches ACP beinhalten muss.


Praxis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 106 (25) ◽  
pp. 1369-1375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Loupatatzis ◽  
Tanja Krones

Zusammenfassung. Advance Care Planning ist ein begleiteter, strukturierter Prozess, der es Patienten und ihren Angehörigen ermöglicht, sich mit ihren Einstellungen zu Leben und Sterben sowie möglichen Behandlungen für den Fall einer Urteilsunfähigkeit mit Hilfe eines ausgebildeten Beraters auseinander zu setzen. Das Konzept kombiniert die individuelle Beratung des Patienten mit einem regionalen, systemischen Ansatz, der sicherstellt, dass alle Beteiligten die verwendeten Dokumente kennen und auch in einer Notfallsituation korrekt anwenden können. Ziel ist es, die Behandlung von urteilsunfähigen Patienten besser im Sinne ihrer Wünsche und Bedürfnisse zu koordinieren und dadurch die Patientenautonomie zu stärken.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document