Co-condensation between transcription factor and coactivator p300 modulates transcriptional bursting kinetics

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Ma ◽  
Zeyue Gao ◽  
Jiegen Wu ◽  
Bijunyao Zhong ◽  
Yuchen Xie ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ineke Brouwer ◽  
Emma Kerklingh ◽  
Fred van Leeuwen ◽  
Tineke L Lenstra

Transcriptional bursting has been linked to the stochastic positioning of nucleosomes. However, how bursting is regulated by remodeling of promoter nucleosomes is unknown. Here, we use single-molecule live-cell imaging of GAL10 transcription in budding yeast to measure how transcriptional bursting changes upon single and double perturbations of chromatin remodeling factors, the transcription factor Gal4 and preinitiation complex (PIC) components. Using dynamic epistasis analysis, we reveal how remodeling of different nucleosomes regulates individual transcriptional bursting parameters. At the nucleosome covering the Gal4 binding sites, RSC acts synergistically with Gal4 binding to facilitate each burst. Conversely, nucleosome remodeling at the TATA box controls only the first burst upon galactose induction. In the absence of remodelers, nucleosomes at canonical TATA boxes are displaced by TBP binding to allow for transcription activation. Overall, our results reveal how promoter nucleosome remodeling, together with transcription factor and PIC binding regulates the kinetics of transcriptional bursting.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Karr ◽  
John J. Ferrie ◽  
Robert Tjian ◽  
Xavier Darzacq

How distal cis-regulatory elements (e.g., enhancers) communicate with promoters remains an unresolved question of fundamental importance. Although transcription factors and cofactors are known to mediate this communication, the mechanism by which diffusible molecules relay regulatory information from one position to another along the chromosome is a biophysical puzzle—one that needs to be revisited in light of recent data that cannot easily fit into previous solutions. Here we propose a new model that diverges from the textbook enhancer–promoter looping paradigm and offer a synthesis of the literature to make a case for its plausibility, focusing on the coactivator p300.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin T. Donovan ◽  
Anh Huynh ◽  
David A. Ball ◽  
Michael G. Poirier ◽  
Daniel R. Larson ◽  
...  

SummaryTranscription factors show rapid and reversible binding to chromatin in living cells, and transcription occurs in sporadic bursts, but how these phenomena are related is unknown. Using a combination of in vitro and in vivo single-molecule imaging approaches, we directly correlated binding of the transcription factor Gal4 with the transcriptional bursting kinetics of the Gal4 target genes GAL3 and GAL10 in living yeast cells. We find that Gal4 dwell times sets the transcriptional burst size. Gal4 dwell time depends on the affinity of the binding site and is reduced by orders of magnitude by nucleosomes. Using a novel imaging platform, we simultaneously tracked transcription factor binding and transcription at one locus, revealing the timing and correlation between Gal4 binding and transcription. Collectively, our data support a model where multiple polymerases initiate during a burst as long as the transcription factor is bound to DNA, and a burst terminates upon transcription factor dissociation.


Nature ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 419 (6908) ◽  
pp. 738-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawryn H. Kasper ◽  
Fayçal Boussouar ◽  
Paul A. Ney ◽  
Carl W. Jackson ◽  
Jerold Rehg ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 1161-1177.e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana A. Stavreva ◽  
David A. Garcia ◽  
Gregory Fettweis ◽  
Prabhakar R. Gudla ◽  
George F. Zaki ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1276-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Uttarkar ◽  
Sandeep Dukare ◽  
Bertan Bopp ◽  
Michael Goblirsch ◽  
Joachim Jose ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 776-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon-Young Kim ◽  
Khoi Chu ◽  
Han-Jong Kim ◽  
Hyun-A Seong ◽  
Ki-Cheol Park ◽  
...  

Abstract Small heterodimer partner (SHP; NR0B2) is an atypical orphan nuclear receptor that lacks a conventional DNA binding domain (DBD) and represses the transcriptional activity of various nuclear receptors. In this study, we examined the novel cross talk between SHP and BETA2/NeuroD, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor. In vitro and in vivo protein interaction studies showed that SHP physically interacts with BETA2/NeuroD, but not its heterodimer partner E47. Moreover, confocal microscopic study and immunostaining results demonstrated that SHP colocalized with BETA2 in islets of mouse pancreas. SHP inhibited BETA2/NeuroD-dependent transactivation of an E-box reporter, whereas SHP was unable to repress the E47-mediated transactivation and the E-box mutant reporter activity. In addition, SHP repressed the BETA2-dependent activity of glucokinase and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 gene promoters. Gel shift and in vitro protein competition assays indicated that SHP inhibits neither dimerization nor DNA binding of BETA2 and E47. Rather, SHP directly repressed BETA2 transcriptional activity and p300-enhanced BETA2/NeuroD transcriptional activity by inhibiting interaction between BETA2 and coactivator p300. We also showed that C-terminal repression domain within SHP is also required for BETA2 repression. However, inhibition of BETA2 activity was not observed by naturally occurring human SHP mutants that cannot interact with BETA2/NeuroD. Taken together, these results suggest that SHP acts as a novel corepressor for basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor BETA2/NeuroD by competing with coactivator p300 for binding to BETA2/NeuroD and by its direct transcriptional repression function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document