Recombinational Repair in the absence of Holliday junction resolvases in E. coli.

Author(s):  
Marc Bichara ◽  
Pelet Sandrine ◽  
B. Lambert Iain
1997 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Sedelnikova ◽  
J. B. Rafferty ◽  
D. Hargreaves ◽  
A. A. Mahdi ◽  
R. G. Lloyd ◽  
...  

Cell ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1063-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariko Ariyoshi ◽  
Dmitry G. Vassylyev ◽  
Hiroshi Iwasaki ◽  
Haruki Nakamura ◽  
Hideo Shinagawa ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 187 (20) ◽  
pp. 7027-7037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Robbins-Manke ◽  
Zoran Z. Zdraveski ◽  
Martin Marinus ◽  
John M. Essigmann

ABSTRACT DNA adenine methylation by DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam) in Escherichia coli plays an important role in processes such as DNA replication initiation, gene expression regulation, and mismatch repair. In addition, E. coli strains deficient in Dam are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents. We used genome microarrays to compare the transcriptional profiles of E. coli strains deficient in Dam and mismatch repair (dam, dam mutS, and mutS mutants). Our results show that >200 genes are expressed at a higher level in the dam strain, while an additional mutation in mutS suppresses the induction of many of the same genes. We also show by microarray and semiquantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR that both dam and dam mutS strains show derepression of LexA-regulated SOS genes as well as the up-regulation of other non-SOS genes involved in DNA repair. To correlate the level of SOS induction and the up-regulation of genes involved in recombinational repair with the level of DNA damage, we used neutral single-cell electrophoresis to determine the number of double-strand breaks per cell in each of the strains. We find that dam mutant E. coli strains have a significantly higher level of double-strand breaks than the other strains. We also observe a broad range in the number of double-strand breaks in dam mutant cells, with a minority of cells showing as many as 10 or more double-strand breaks. We propose that the up-regulation of recombinational repair in dam mutants allows for the efficient repair of double-strand breaks whose formation is dependent on functional mismatch repair.


2007 ◽  
Vol 189 (15) ◽  
pp. 5728-5737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tonje Davidsen ◽  
Hanne K. Tuven ◽  
Magnar Bjørås ◽  
Einar A. Rødland ◽  
Tone Tønjum

ABSTRACT The current increase in the incidence and severity of infectious diseases mandates improved understanding of the basic biology and DNA repair profiles of virulent microbes. In our studies of the major pathogen and model organism Neisseria meningitidis, we constructed a panel of mutants inactivating genes involved in base excision repair, mismatch repair, nucleotide excision repair (NER), translesion synthesis, and recombinational repair pathways. The highest spontaneous mutation frequency among the N. meningitidis single mutants was found in the MutY-deficient strain as opposed to mutS mutants in Escherichia coli, indicating a role for meningococcal MutY in antibiotic resistance development. Recombinational repair was recognized as a major pathway counteracting methyl methanesulfonate-induced alkylation damage in the N. meningitidis. In contrast to what has been shown in other species, meningococcal NER did not contribute significantly to repair of alkylation-induced DNA damage, and meningococcal recombinational repair may thus be one of the main pathways for removal of abasic (apurinic/apyrimidinic) sites and strand breaks in DNA. Conversely, NER was identified as the main meningococcal defense pathway against UV-induced DNA damage. N. meningitidis RecA single mutants exhibited only a moderate decrease in survival after UV exposure as opposed to E. coli recA strains, which are extremely UV sensitive, possibly reflecting the lack of a meningococcal SOS response. In conclusion, distinct differences between N. meningitidis and established DNA repair characteristics in E. coli and other species were identified.


2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 917-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ala Berdichevsky ◽  
Lior Izhar ◽  
Zvi Livneh

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gurunathan Laxmikanthan ◽  
Chen Xu ◽  
Axel F Brilot ◽  
David Warren ◽  
Lindsay Steele ◽  
...  

The molecular machinery responsible for DNA expression, recombination, and compaction has been difficult to visualize as functionally complete entities due to their combinatorial and structural complexity. We report here the structure of the intact functional assembly responsible for regulating and executing a site-specific DNA recombination reaction. The assembly is a 240-bp Holliday junction (HJ) bound specifically by 11 protein subunits. This higher-order complex is a key intermediate in the tightly regulated pathway for the excision of bacteriophage λ viral DNA out of the E. coli host chromosome, an extensively studied paradigmatic model system for the regulated rearrangement of DNA. Our results provide a structural basis for pre-existing data describing the excisive and integrative recombination pathways, and they help explain their regulation.


2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (14) ◽  
pp. 4731-4739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po-Shen Pan ◽  
Fiona A. Curtis ◽  
Chris L. Carroll ◽  
Irene Medina ◽  
Lisa A. Liotta ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 180 (15) ◽  
pp. 3750-3756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shisheng Li ◽  
Raymond Waters

ABSTRACT hupA and hupB encode the α and β subunits of the Escherichia coli histone-like protein HU. Here we show that E. coli hup mutants are sensitive to UV in the rec+ sbc +, recBC sbcA, recBC sbcBC, umuDC,recF, and recD backgrounds. However,hupAB mutations do not enhance the UV sensitivity of resolvase-deficient recG ruvA strains. hupAB uvrA and hupAB recG strains are supersensitive to UV.hup mutations enhance the UV sensitivity ofruvA strains to a much lesser extent but enhance that ofrus-1 ruvA strains to the same extent as forrus+ ruv + strains. Our results suggest that HU plays a role in recombinational DNA repair that is not specifically limited to double-strand break repair or daughter strand gap repair; the lack of HU affects the RecG RusA and RuvABC pathways for Holliday junction processing equally if the two pathways are equally active in recombinational repair; the function of HU is not in the substrate processing step or in the RecFOR-directed synapsis action during recombinational repair. Furthermore, the UV sensitivity ofhup mutants cannot be suppressed by overexpression of wild-type or mutant gyrB, which confers novobiocin resistance, or by different concentrations of a gyrase inhibitor that can increase or decrease the supercoiling of chromosomal DNA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document