Test–retest reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing on two sites within the L5 dermatome of the lumbar spine and lower extremity

2014 ◽  
Vol 579 ◽  
pp. 157-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.A. Knutti ◽  
M.R. Suter ◽  
E. Opsommer
2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. M. Costa ◽  
O. Morita-Neto ◽  
E. N. S. de Araújo-Júnior ◽  
F. A. Sampaio ◽  
P. C. R. Conti ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1932.1-1933
Author(s):  
M. Eymir ◽  
E. Yuksel ◽  
B. Unver ◽  
K. Sevik ◽  
V. Karatosun

Background:Patients with TKA show impairments in standing balance up to 1 year after surgery. The impaired standing balance in TKA patients was found to be associated with falls risk and decreased functional level. Assessing of standing balance with objective and reliable assessments tools would therefore be extremely useful for determining accurate exercise program, and risks of falling, especially during the rehabilitative period when ambulation is at its most unsteady (1, 2). The stepping maneuver requires adequate strength and motor control to stabilize the body over the stance limb while the other leg is stepping, therefore the Step Test (ST) provides significant information for dynamic standing balance and lower limb motor control (3). The reliability of ST is reported in patient groups such as stroke, however, there is not any study that investigates the reliability of ST in patients with TKA in the current literature.Objectives:The purposes of this study were to determine the test-retest reliability and the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the ST in patients with TKA.Methods:40 patients with TKA due to knee osteoarthritis, operated by the same surgeon, were included in this study. Patients performed trials for ST twice on the same day. Between the first and second trials, patients waited for an hour on sitting position to prevent fatigue. The ST assesses an individual’s ability to place one foot onto a 7.5-cm-high step and then back down to the floor repeatedly as fast as possible for 15 seconds. The score is the number of steps completed in the 15-second period for each lower extremity. Scores for each lower extremity were recorded separately. Prior to the testing, the ST was demonstrated by the tester and all participants were allowed to a practice trial.Results:The ST showed an excellent test-retest reliability (ICC2,1=0.95) in this study. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and MDC95for ST were 0.37 and 1.02, respectively.Conclusion:This study found that the ST has an excellent test–retest reliability in patients with TKA. It is an effective and reliable tool for measuring dynamic standing balance and participant falls. As a performance-based clinical test, the ST is easy to score, can be applied in a short time as part of the routine medical examination. Therefore, inclusion of ST into a more comprehensive battery of performance-based measures of standing balance and lower limb motor control function in subjects with TKA should be considered.References:[1]Si, H. B., Zeng, Y., Zhong, J., et al. (2017). The effect of primary total knee arthroplasty on the incidence of falls and balance-related functions in patients with osteoarthritis. Scientific reports, 7(1), 1-9.[2]Moutzouri, M., Gleeson, N., Billis, E., et al. (2017). The effect of total knee arthroplasty on patients’ balance and incidence of falls: a systematic review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 25(11), 3439-3451.[3]Hill, K. D., Bernhardt, J., McGann, A. M., et al. (1996). A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke patients: reliability, validity and comparison with healthy elderly. Physiotherapy Canada, 48(4), 257-262.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mari A. Griffioen ◽  
Joel D. Greenspan ◽  
Meg Johantgen ◽  
Kathryn Von Rueden ◽  
Robert V. O’Toole ◽  
...  

Background: Chronic pain is a significant problem for patients with lower extremity injuries. While pain hypersensitivity has been identified in many chronic pain conditions, it is not known whether patients with chronic pain following lower extremity fracture report pain hypersensitivity in the injured leg. Purpose: To quantify and compare peripheral somatosensory function and sensory nerve activation thresholds in persons with chronic pain following lower extremity fractures with a cohort of persons with no history of lower extremity fractures. Method: This was a cross-sectional study where quantitative sensory testing and current perception threshold testing were conducted on the injured and noninjured legs of cases and both legs of controls. Results: A total of 14 cases and 28 controls participated in the study. Mean time since injury at the time of testing for cases was 22.3 (standard deviation = 12.1) months. The warmth detection threshold ( p = .024) and nerve activation thresholds at 2,000 Hz ( p < .001) and 250 Hz ( p = .002), respectively, were significantly higher in cases compared to controls. Conclusion: This study suggests that patients with chronic pain following lower extremity fractures may experience hypoesthesia in the injured leg, which contrasts with the finding of hyperesthesia previously observed in other chronic pain conditions but is in accord with patients with nerve injuries and surgeries. This is the first study to examine peripheral sensory nerve function at the site of injury in patients with chronic pain following lower extremity fractures using quantitative sensory testing and current perception threshold testing.


Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 2336-2347
Author(s):  
Alexandra E Koulouris ◽  
Robert R Edwards ◽  
Kathleen Dorado ◽  
Kristin L Schreiber ◽  
Asimina Lazaridou ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Recent studies suggest that sensory phenotyping may provide critical information for the diagnosis and management of patients with chronic neuropathic pain (NP). However, many formal quantitative sensory testing (QST) paradigms require expensive equipment, a dedicated location, and substantial time commitments on the part of patient and examiner, highlighting the need for a convenient and portable “bedside” QST battery. We developed and tested a bedside QST battery in a sample of patients with chronic NP. Methods Participants (N = 51) attended two in-person visits over approximately two weeks, during which they underwent QST using both laboratory-based equipment and simple, easily accessible bedside tools. Participants also completed questionnaires about their daily pain and NP symptoms. Results Test–retest reliability estimates were highly statistically significant and did not differ between bedside (mean r = 0.60) and laboratory-based (mean r = 0.72) QST. Bedside QST variables and corresponding laboratory-based QST variables were highly correlated, suggesting adequate criterion validity for the bedside tests. Conclusions Results from the present study may have important implications for the sensory phenotyping and subsequent management of patients with chronic NP. Implementation of a protocol that uses inexpensive, portable, and convenient tools may allow for the application of QST in variety of clinical settings and advance NP research.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-30
Author(s):  
Konstantinos. D. Papadopoulos ◽  
Jeanette M Thom ◽  
Jeremy G Jones ◽  
Jane Noyes ◽  
Dimitris Stasinopoulos

Two very common scales used in the assessment of patellofemoral pain syndrome are the anterior knee pain scale and the lower extremity functional scale. There is only limited evidence regarding how specifically reliable and meaningful these scales are when assessing the syndrome.The purpose of this study was to assess which questions in both scales are suitable for patellofemoral pain syndrome patients.20 patients with patellofemoralpain were recruited from the physiotherapy waiting list of the local hospital and asked to complete the anterior kneepain scale and the lower extremity functional scale on two occasions at least one week apart. A general test-retest reliability of the scales was measured in addition withtest-retest and internal consistency of each single question. Finally,the questions markedas ‘no problem’ in both sessions were also measured. The total scores of the two scales were found to be highly reliable. However, the anterior knee pain scale revealed five questions with moderate test retest reliability, two questions with less internal consistency whilst it included three less meaningful questions. The lower extremity functional scale showed four questions with moderate test retest reliability,one question with less internal consistency andsix meaningless questions. This study agrees with previous research stating that there are questions in both scales that can be considered meaninglessand less reliable and should probably be excluded or replaced with other questions. The study provides useful information for the development of a more appropriate patellofemoralpain syndrome scale or a modified anterior knee pain scale and lower extremity functional scale for patellofemoralpain syndrome use only.


1998 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanne Desrosiers ◽  
François Prince ◽  
Annie Rochette ◽  
Michel Raîche

The objectives of this study were to standardize measurement procedures and study the test-retest and interrater reliability of the belt-resisted method for measuring the lower extremity isometric strength of three muscle groups. The strength of 33 healthy, elderly, community-dwelling subjects was evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer using the belt-resisted method. Isometric strength testing of three muscle groups (hip flexors, knee extensors, and ankle dorsiflexors) was performed on two separate occasions, I week apart, by the same tester to determine test-retest reliability. The test results of two different examiners testing on different days were used to determine interrater reliability. Test-retest reliability was higher than interrater reliability. Test-retest reliability coefficients of the three muscle groups were high (J9-.95). For interrater reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients varied from .64 to .92. depending on the muscle group and side. For the two kinds of reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients increased from proximal to distal. The method for the hip muscle group should be modified to increase reliability of the measure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document