scholarly journals Chemical tempering of feldspathic porcelain for dentistry applications: A review

Open Ceramics ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 100201
Author(s):  
Edwin Ruales-Carrera ◽  
Marcelo Dal Bó ◽  
Wenceslau Fernandes das Neves ◽  
Márcio Celso Fredel ◽  
Claudia Angela Maziero Volpato ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-11
Author(s):  
Marcia Borba ◽  
Paula Benetti ◽  
Giordana P. Furini ◽  
Kátia R. Weber ◽  
Tábata M. da Silva

Background: The use of zirconia-based ceramics to produce monolithic restorations has increased due to improvements in the optical properties of the materials. Traditionally, zirconiabased ceramics were veneered with porcelain or glass-ceramic and were not directly exposed to the oral environment. Therefore, there are several doubts regarding the wear of the monolithic zirconia restoration and their antagonists. Additionally, different surface treatments are recommended to promote a smooth surface, including glaze and several polishing protocols. To support the correct clinical application, it is important to understand the advantages and limitations of each surface treatment. Objective: The aim of this short literature review is to investigate the factors that may affect the wear of monolithic zirconia restorations in service and their antagonists. Methods: Pubmed/Medline database was accessed to review the literature from a 10-year period using the keywords: zirconia, monolithic, prosthesis, wear. Both clinical and in vitro studies were included in the review. Results: Studies investigated the effect of several surface treatments, including grinding with diamond- burs, polishing and glazing, on the surface roughness, phase transformation and wear capacity of monolithic zirconia. The wear behavior of monolithic zirconia was frequently compared to the wear behavior of other ceramics, such as feldspathic porcelain, lithium disilicate-based glassceramic and leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic. Human tooth, ceramics and resin composites were used as antagonist in the investigations. Only short-term clinical studies are available (up to 2 years). Conclusion: Literature findings suggest that zirconia monolithic restorations are wear resistant and unlikely to cause excessive wear to the antagonist, especially when compared to feldspathic porcelain and glass-ceramics. Monolithic zirconia should be polished rather than glazed. Yet, none of the polishing systems studied was able to completely restore the initial surface conditions of zirconia after being adjusted with burs. More clinical evidence of the antagonist tooth wear potential of monolithic zirconia is needed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 767-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Federizzi ◽  
Érica Alves Gomes ◽  
Samantha Schaffer Pugilato Báratro ◽  
Flares Baratto-Filho ◽  
Ataís Bacchi ◽  
...  

Abstract This case report describes an esthetic treatment to improve the shape and alignment of the anterior teeth, reestablishing smile harmony, using feldspathic porcelain veneers. Results of clinical follow up after 36 months are also presented. The advantages, disadvantages and limitations of the technique are detailed with reference to the relevant literature. This suggests that the success of treatment depends on adequate conditions of bonding between the veneers and the tooth complex, which involves parameters such as the strength and durability of the bond interface. Therefore, the clinical success of feldspathic porcelain veneers depends on the accurate selection of cases and correct execution of clinical and laboratory procedures. The rehabilitation involved from first right premolar to the left with feldspathic porcelain veneers made on refractory dies. After the 3-year follow up, excellent clinical results and patient satisfaction were achieved.


1993 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.W. Fairhurst ◽  
P.E. Lockwood ◽  
R.D. Ringle ◽  
S.W. Twiggs

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamolporn WATTANASIRMKIT ◽  
Viritpon SRIMANEEPONG ◽  
Kanchana KANCHANATAWEWAT ◽  
Naruporn MONMATURAPOJ ◽  
Pasutha THUNYAKITPISAL ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Juliana Gómez ◽  
Astrid Rueda ◽  
Edgar Alexader Ossa Henao

Dental ceramics made from Yttria stabilized tetragonal Zirconia polycrystalline (Y-TZP) with feldspathic porcelain veneers have similar mechanical and aesthetic response to natural tooth. However, cases of early failure, such as chipping or fracture in the veneering have been reported after short periods of use. The present study evaluated the feldspathic porcelain (VITA-VM9) with addition of 0.5 and 2.5 wt% Alumina-Zirconia as reinforcing agents. Hardness, fracture toughness, contact resistance and color variations were evaluated finding better mechanical performance on the new formulations.


1996 ◽  
Vol 104 (1216) ◽  
pp. 1151-1155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryusuke HARADA ◽  
Noriyuki SUGIYAMA ◽  
Hiroto SHIN ◽  
Hideki ISHIDA

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 742-750
Author(s):  
İrem Kurt ◽  
Zafer Cavit Çehreli ◽  
Ayça Arman Özçırpıcı ◽  
Çağla Şar

ABSTRACT Objectives: To determine the best bonding method of orthodontic attachment among monolithic zirconia, feldspathic porcelain, hybrid porcelain, and the impact of surface-conditioning methods using a three-dimensional optical profilometer after debonding. Materials and Methods: 56 feldspathic porcelain, 56 monolithic zirconia, and 56 hybrid porcelain samples were divided into four surface treatment subgroups: (1) hydrofluoric (HF) acid etch + silane, (2) Al2O3 sandblasting + silane, (3) silicoating (SiO2), and (4) diamond bur + silane. The specimens were tested to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS). Residual composite was removed after debonding. Three-dimensional white-light interferometry was used to obtain quantitative measurements on surface roughness. Results: The highest SBS value was found for the HF acid–etched feldspathic porcelain group. The average surface roughness values were significantly higher in all material groups in which diamond bur was applied, while roughening with Cojet provided average surface roughness values closer to the original material surface. Conclusions: Variations in structures of the materials and roughening techniques affected the SBS and surface roughness findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document