Salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma in Denmark 1990–2005: Outcome and independent prognostic factors including the benefit of radiotherapy. Results of the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA)

Abstract Introduction Head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HNCUP) is a rare condition whose prognostic factors that are significant for survival vary between studies. No randomized treatment study has been performed thus far, and the optimal treatment is not established. Objective The present study aimed to explore various prognostic factors and compare the two main treatments for HNCUP: neck dissection and (chemo) radiation vs primary (chemo) radiation. Methods A national multicenter study was performed with data from the Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register (SweHNCR) and from the patients' medical records from 2008 to 2012. Results Two-hundred and sixty HNCUP patients were included. The tumors were HPV-positive in 80%. The overall 5-year survival rate of patients treated with curative intent was 71%. Age (p < 0.001), performance status (p= 0.036), and N stage (p= 0.046) were significant factors for overall survival according to the multivariable analysis. Treatment with neck dissection and (chemo) radiation (122 patients) gave an overall 5-year survival of 73%, and treatment with primary (chemo) radiation (87 patients) gave an overall 5-year survival of 71%, with no significant difference in overall or disease-free survival between the 2 groups. Conclusions Age, performance status, and N stage were significant prognostic factors. Treatment with neck dissection and (chemo) radiation and primary (chemo) radiation gave similar survival outcomes. A randomized treatment study that includes quality of life is needed to establish the optimal treatment.

Download Full-text

Prognosis in Head and Neck Cancer: Importance of Nutritional and Biological Inflammatory Status

Otolaryngology ◽

10.1177/01945998211004592 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 019459982110045

Author(s):

Nicolas Saroul ◽

Mathilde Puechmaille ◽

Céline Lambert ◽

Achraf Sayed Hassan ◽

Julian Biau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Head And Neck Cancer ◽

Prognostic Factors ◽

Inflammatory Response ◽

Nutritional Status ◽

Head And Neck ◽

Neck Cancer ◽

Risk Index ◽

Nutritional Risk ◽

Inflammatory Status ◽

Nutritional Risk Index

Objectives To determine the importance of nutritional status, social status, and inflammatory status in the prognosis of head and neck cancer. Study Design Single-center retrospective study of prospectively collected data. Setting Tertiary referral center. Methods Ninety-two consecutive patients newly diagnosed for cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract without metastases were assessed at time of diagnosis for several prognostic factors. Nutritional status was assessed by the nutritional risk index, social status by the EPICES score, and inflammatory status by the systemic inflammatory response index. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results In multivariable analysis, the main prognostic factors were the TNM classification (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.34, P = .002, for stage T3-4), malnutrition as assessed by the nutritional risk index (HR = 3.64, P = .008, for severe malnutrition), and a systemic inflammatory response index score ≥1.6 (HR = 3.32, P = .02). Social deprivation was not a prognostic factor. Conclusion Prognosis in head and neck cancer is multifactorial; however, malnutrition and inflammation are important factors that are potentially reversible by early intervention.

Download Full-text

Prolonged radiation time and low nadir hemoglobin during postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy are both poor prognostic factors with synergistic effect on locally advanced head and neck cancer patients

OncoTargets and Therapy ◽

10.2147/ott.s70204 ◽

2015 ◽

pp. 251 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Nai-Wen Su ◽

Chung-Ji Liu ◽

Yi-Shing Leu ◽

Jehn-Chuan Lee ◽

Yu-Jen Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Head And Neck Cancer ◽

Prognostic Factors ◽

Synergistic Effect ◽

Head And Neck ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Neck Cancer ◽

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Advanced Head ◽

Radiation Time

Download Full-text

Evaluation of the prevalence and severity of xerophthalmia in head and neck cancers patients undergoing curative radiotherapy

Asian Journal of Ophthalmology ◽

10.35119/asjoo.v14i4.149 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 14 (4) ◽

Author(s):

Sowmya V ◽

Dipika Jayachander ◽

Vijna Kamath ◽

Mithun SK Rao ◽

Mohammed Raees Tonse ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Head And Neck Cancer ◽

Head And Neck ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Neck Cancer ◽

Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca ◽

Study Objective ◽

Cancer Group ◽

Curative Radiotherapy ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Rectal Cancers

Background: The study objective was to assess the development of xerophthalmia [dry eye syndrome (DES) or keratoconjunctivitis sicca] in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.Methods: Twenty two head and neck cancer patients requiring more than 60 Gy of curative radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy and ten patients requiring radiotherapy/ chemoradiotherapy for treating cancers in the non head and neck regions (like breast, oesophagus, prostate, cervix and rectal cancers) were also enrolled in the study. The development of DES was studied at the beginning (day 0, before the start of radiotherapy) at day 21 (after completion of 30 Gy) and on completion of the treatment (> 60 Gy). As a comparative cohort, people with non head and neck cancer needing curative radiotherapy were also evaluated for comparison.Results: There was no difference in degree of DES between the Head and Neck cancer cohorts and non head and neck group at the beginning of treatment. However there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between the two groups at both mid and end of RT time point. Inter comparison between the various time points in the head and neck cancer group showed that the incidence of DES increased with the radiation exposure and was significant (pre to mid p < 0.001; and mid to end p < 0.005). A negative (r = -0.262) correlation was seen between DES and distance.Conclusions: The study showed that lesser the distance from the epicenter of the radiation to the orbital rim more was the severity of DES.

Download Full-text