Histological differences of intrapancreatic neural system among ordinary chronic pancreatitis and autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 and type 2

Pancreatology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. S40
Author(s):  
Tsukasa Ikeura ◽  
Kota Kato ◽  
Kazushige Uchida ◽  
Makoto Takaoka ◽  
Akiyoshi Nishio ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison L Yang ◽  
Julia McNabb-Baltar

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a subcategory of chronic pancreatitis that is highly responsive to steroids. The term was first proposed in 1995 by Yoshida and colleagues, and since its discovery, the diagnosis of AIP has dramatically increased. AIP is a chronic fibroinflammatory disease characterized by lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates and fibrosis on histology. There are two distinct subtypes: type 1 AIP is the pancreatic manifestation of a systemic serum immunoglobulin G subtype 4–related disease (IgG4-RD) and type 2 AIP is described clinically as idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis and has no association with IgG4. Clinically, AIP presents most commonly as obstructive jaundice in type 1 AIP and can present as acute pancreatitis in type 2 AIP. The diagnostic criteria include histology, imaging findings, and responsiveness to steroids as well as laboratory findings and other organ involvement. The mainstay of treatment is steroid therapy, with immunomodulators such as rituximab used for maintenance or relapsing disease. Long-term complications of AIP include pancreatic insufficiency and are often associated with relapsing disease. This review contains 45 references, 1 figure, and 2 tables. Key Words: autoimmune pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, EUS-guided biopsy, IgG4, immunomodulatory, obstructive jaundice, pancreas mass, steroid


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 300
Author(s):  
Madeline Drake ◽  
Shah-Jahan M. Dodwad ◽  
Joy Davis ◽  
Lillian S. Kao ◽  
Yanna Cao ◽  
...  

The incidence of acute and chronic pancreatitis is increasing in the United States. Rates of acute pancreatitis (AP) are similar in both sexes, but chronic pancreatitis (CP) is more common in males. When stratified by etiology, women have higher rates of gallstone AP, while men have higher rates of alcohol- and tobacco-related AP and CP, hypercalcemic AP, hypertriglyceridemic AP, malignancy-related AP, and type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). No significant sex-related differences have been reported in medication-induced AP or type 2 AIP. Whether post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis is sex-associated remains controversial. Animal models have demonstrated sex-related differences in the rates of induction and severity of AP, CP, and AIP. Animal and human studies have suggested that a combination of risk factor profiles, as well as genes, may be responsible for the observed differences. More investigation into the sex-related differences of AP and CP is desired in order to improve clinical management by developing effective prevention strategies, diagnostics, and therapeutics.


Gut ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 1373-1380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terumi Kamisawa ◽  
Suresh T Chari ◽  
Markus M Lerch ◽  
Myung-Hwan Kim ◽  
Thomas M Gress ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Nikolic ◽  
Poya Ghorbani ◽  
Raffaella Pozzi Mucelli ◽  
Sam Ghazi ◽  
Francisco Baldaque- Silva ◽  
...  

Introduction: Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a disease that may mimic malignant pancreatic lesions both in terms of symptomatology and imaging appearance. The aim of the present study is to analyse experiences of surgery in patients with AIP in one of the largest European cohorts. Methods: We performed a single-centre retrospective study of patients diagnosed with AIP at the Department of Abdominal Diseases at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, between January 2001 and October 2020. Results: There were 159 patients diagnosed with AIP, and among them 35 (22.0%) patients had surgery: 20 (57.1%) males and 15 (42.9%) females; average age at surgery was 59 years (range 37-81). Follow-up period after surgery was 67 months (range 1-235). AIP type 1 was diagnosed in 28 (80%) patients and AIP type 2 in 7 (20%) patients. Malignant and premalignant lesions were diagnosed in 8 (22.9%) patients for whom AIP was not the primary differential diagnosis but, in all cases, it was described as a simultaneous finding and recorded in retrospective analysis in histological reports of surgical specimens. Conclusions: Diagnosis of AIP is not always straightforward, and, in some cases, it is not easy to differentiate it from the malignancy. Surgery is generally not indicated for AIP but might be considered in patients when suspicion of malignant/premalignant lesions cannot be excluded after complete diagnostic work-up.


2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 805-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeyuki Kawa ◽  
◽  
Kazuichi Okazaki ◽  
Kenji Notohara ◽  
Mamoru Watanabe ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-337
Author(s):  
S. V. Lishchuk ◽  
Е. A. Dubova ◽  
K. А. Pavlov ◽  
Yu. D. Udalov

Rationale: In the recent years, an increased interest to autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been seen, related to growing diagnostic potential. In its turn, this leads to an increase in numbers of diagnosed AIP cases. At present, two types of AIP have been described with diverse clinical manifestation and morphology of the pancreas. However, the reproducibility of the differential diagnosis between AIP type 1 and 2 is low even among pancreatic pathologists.Aim: To identify criteria for the morphologic diagnosis of AIP type 1 and 2.Materials and methods: A morphological study of biopsy and surgical specimens from 26 patients with AIP was performed. There were 22 cases of AIP type 1 and 4 cases of AIP type 2. In addition to hematoxylin eosin staining of the specimens, immunohistochemistry was used with counting of CD138+ absolute numbers, determination of IgG+ and IgG4+ cells in the inflammatory infiltrates, as well as the ratios of IgG4+/IgG+ and IgG4+/CD138+ cells.Results: AIP type 1 was characterized by storiform fibrosis of the pancreatic tissue (81.8% cases), involving the parapancreatic fat tissue, by moderateto-severe lymphoplasmocytic infiltration and signs of obliterative/non-obliterative phlebitis. Type 2 AIP was characterized by severe fibrosis with predominantly periductal (centrilobular) fibrosis and mild chronic inflammatory infiltration of the pancreas, while there was no extension of fibrosis and inflammatory infiltration to the parapancreatic tissues in any case. The mean number of CD138+ cell in AIP type 1 was 101.2 ± 27.9 per 1 high-power field (HPF), and in AIP type 2, it was 42.8 ± 20.9 per 1 HPF. The mean absolute number of IgG+ cells in AIP type 1 was 99.6 ± 25.7 per 1 HPF, whereas in AIP type 2, 42.1 ± 20.8 per 1 HPF. In AIP type 1, the mean number of IgG4+ plasmatic cells in the infiltrates was 74.5 ± 27.2 per 1 HPF, whereas in AIP type 2, it was 3.4 ± 2.7 per 1 HPF. The IgG4+/IgG+ ratio was 75 ± 12.6% vs. 8.4 ± 6.2%, and the IgG4+/CD138+ ratio was 72.4 ± 12.3% vs. 8.3 ± 5.9% in AIP type 1 and type 2, respectively.Conclusion: For the differential diagnosis of type 1 and 2 AIP, it is necessary to take into consideration not only typical histological abnormalities, but also the numbers of CD138+, IgG+ and IgG4+ cells within the inflammatory infiltrate, as well as the IgG4+/IgG+ and IgG4+/CD138+ ratios.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 525-534
Author(s):  
E. Yu. Lomakina ◽  
O. V. Taratina ◽  
E. A. Belousova

Background: For a long time there has been a discussion about how chronic pancreatitis (CP) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are related to each other. If a patient has both conditions, should they be viewed as two separate disorders, or one of them is a plausible consequence of the other? If the latter is true, what are pathophysiological mechanisms of DM in CP? Current consensus documents by specialists in pancreatic diseases pay little attention to this issue, and their main statements have low level of evidence. The Russian consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of CP (2016) contains no statements on DM. In the Russian guidelines and consensus documents to be developed, it is necessary to include provisions on the pancreatogenic DM as an independent “other type DM’, with consideration of its pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical particulars.Aim: To characterize the state-of-the-art in pancreatogenic DM, to demonstrate its differences from DM types 1 and 2 from pathogenetic and clinical perspectives.Methods: The review is based on the results of meta-analyses, systematic reviews and main provisions of the existing clinical guidelines and consensus documents available from PubMed and E-library.Results: According to various sources, Type 3c DM, or latent impaired glucose tolerance in CP, can eventually develop in 25 to 80% patients with CP. Impaired glucose tolerance is found in 40 to 60% of patients with acute pancreatitis, with persistent hyperglycemia after acute episode seen in 15 to 18% of the patients. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency is commonly seen in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, although the data on its prevalence are highly contradictory indicating a lack of knowledge in the field. Type 3c DM is characterized by its manifestation at later stages of CP, concomitant excretory deficiency of the pancreas, brittle course with proneness to hypoglycemia and no ketoacidosis. The highest risk group includes patients with longstanding CP, previous partial pancreatic resection and patients with early calcifying pancreatitis, mainly of the alcoholic origin. Optimal and rational medical treatment of pancreatogenic DM still remains disputable, while the evidence base of the efficacy and safety of various anti-diabetic agents in this disease is lacking, and no consensus on the issue has been yet reached. General treatment guidelines given in a number of international consensus documents are limited to cautious insulin administration.Conclusion: Pancreatogenic DM differs from Type 1 and Type 2 DM in a number of aspects, namely, mechanisms of hyperglycemia, hormonal profiles, clinical particulars and treatment approaches. Endocrine pancreatic insufficiency in CP is caused by secondary inflammatory injury of the pancreatic islets. The key to specifics of Type 3c DM lies in anatomical and physiological interplay of the exocrine and endocrine compartments of the pancreas. At presents, most provisions on pancreatogenic DM are empirical and seem to be rather declarative, because intrinsic mechanisms of this type of diabetes and moreover its pathogenetically based treatment have been poorly studied. Nevertheless, all patients with CP or other pancreatic diseases should be assessed for pancreatogenic DM.


2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S912
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Goni ◽  
Nicolo' De Pretis ◽  
Antonio Amodio ◽  
Francesco Bonatti ◽  
Davide Martorana ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document