Men considering a hypothetical treatment for prostate cancer: A comparison to patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori Van Manen ◽  
Deb Feldman-Stewart ◽  
Michael D. Brundage
2021 ◽  
pp. 302-310
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Suzuki ◽  
Vince Grillo ◽  
Yirong Chen ◽  
Shikha Singh ◽  
Dianne Athene Ledesma

PURPOSE Sixteen percent (16%) of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) show no bone metastasis at diagnosis. However, 33% will become metastatic within 2 years. The goal of treatment in patients with nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC), therefore, is to delay symptomatic metastases without undue toxicity. With novel antiandrogen treatments of different strengths and limitations available, physician preferences for nmCRPC treatment in Japan should be understood. METHODS A discrete choice experiment was conducted. Physicians chose between two hypothetical treatments in nmCRPC defined by six attributes: risk of fatigue, falls or fracture, cognitive impairment, hypertension, rashes as side effects of treatment, and extension of time until cancer-related pain occurs. Relative preference weights and relative importance were estimated by hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression. Physicians were also asked to make treatment decisions based on four hypothetical patient profiles to understand the most important factors driving decision making. RESULTS A total of 151 physicians completed the survey. Extension of time until cancer-related pain occurs was the most important attribute (relative importance, 32.3%; CI, 31.3% to 33.3%). Based on summed preference weights across all attributes, preferences for hypothetical treatment profiles I, II, and III were compared. A hypothetical treatment profile with better safety though shorter extension time was preferred (I: mean [standard deviation] = 1.7 [1.6 to 2.1]) over treatment profiles with lower safety but longer extension time (II: −2.7 [−2.8 to −2.6] and III: −0.2 [−0.3 to −0.1]). Treatment characteristics were more important factors for physicians' decision making than patient characteristics in prescribing treatment. CONCLUSION Physicians preferred a treatment with better safety profile, and treatment characteristics were the most important factors for decision making. This might have implications in physicians' decision making for nmCRPC treatment in the future in Japan.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A284-A284
Author(s):  
T BOLIN ◽  
A KNEEBONE ◽  
T LARSSON
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 538-539
Author(s):  
Joseph F. Pazona ◽  
C. Shad Thaxton ◽  
Neema Navai ◽  
Brian T. Helfand ◽  
Lee C. Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 77-78
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Porter ◽  
Jochen Walz ◽  
Andrea Gallina ◽  
Claudio Jeldres ◽  
Koichi Kodama ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 156-156
Author(s):  
Andrea Salonia ◽  
Pierre I. Karakiewicz ◽  
Andrea Gallina ◽  
Alberto Briganti ◽  
Tommaso C. Camerata ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 223-223
Author(s):  
Sreenivasa R. Chinni ◽  
Hamilto Yamamoto ◽  
Zhong Dong ◽  
Aaron Sabbota ◽  
Sanaa Nabha ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 222-222
Author(s):  
Mireia Musquera ◽  
Maria J. Ribal ◽  
Yolanda Arce ◽  
Humberto Villavicencio ◽  
Fernando Algaba ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 93-93
Author(s):  
Makoto Sumitomo ◽  
Kenji Kuroda ◽  
Takako Asano ◽  
Akio Horiguchi ◽  
Keiichi Ito ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document