Fitness cost, realized heritability and stability of resistance to spiromesifen in house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)

2020 ◽  
Vol 168 ◽  
pp. 104648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehboob Alam ◽  
Rizwan Mustafa Shah ◽  
Sarfraz Ali Shad ◽  
Muhammad Binyameen
Author(s):  
Naeem Abbas ◽  
Muhammad Abubakar ◽  
Muhammad Waqar Hassan ◽  
Sarfraz Ali Shad ◽  
Abdulwahab M Hafez

Abstract Flonicamid is a chordotonal modulator and novel systemic insecticide that has been used frequently for controlling a broad range of insect pests. The risk of flonicamid resistance was assessed through laboratory selection and determining inheritance pattern and cross-resistance potential to five insecticides in house fly, Musca domestica L. Very low to high flonicamid resistance in M. domestica populations was found compared with the susceptible strain (SS). A flonicamid-selected (Flonica-RS) M. domestica strain developed 57.73-fold resistance to flonicamid screened for 20 generations compared with the SS. Overlapping 95% fiducial limits of LC50 of the F1 and F1ǂ, and dominance values (0.87 for F1 and 0.92 for F1ǂ) revealed an autosomal and incomplete dominant flonicamid resistance. The monogenic model of resistance inheritance suggested a polygenic flonicamid resistance. The Flonica-RS strain displayed negative cross-resistance between flonicamid and sulfoxaflor (0.10-fold) or clothianidin (0.50-fold), and very low cross-resistance between flonicamid and flubendiamide (4.71-fold), spinetoram (4.68-fold), or thiamethoxam (2.02-fold) in comparison with the field population. The estimated realized heritability (h2) value of flonicamid resistance was 0.02. With selection mortality 40–90%, the generations required for a 10-fold increase in LC50 of flonicamid were 94–258 at h2 (0.02) and slope (3.29). Flonicamid resistance was inherited as autosomal, incomplete dominant, and polygenic in the Flonica-RS. Negative or very low cross-resistance between flonicamid and sulfoxaflor, clothianidin, flubendiamide, spinetoram, and thiamethoxam means that these insecticides can be used as alternatives for controlling M. domestica. These data can be useful in devising the management for M. domestica.


2021 ◽  
pp. 110423
Author(s):  
Manuel Sánchez ◽  
Carolaynne Gómez ◽  
Constanza Avendaño ◽  
Iliak Harmsen ◽  
Daniela Ortiz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document