The impact of a rehabilitation outreach team upon acute physiotherapy performance for the management of patients with hip fracture

Introduction: A novel virus, SARS-CoV-2, has caused a fatal global pandemic which particularly affects the elderly and those with comorbidities. Hip fractures affect elderly populations, necessitate hospital admissions and place this group at particular risk from COVID-19 infection. This study investigates the effect of COVID-19 infection on 30-day hip fracture mortality. Method: Data related to 75 adult hip fractures admitted to two units during March and April 2020 were reviewed. The mean age was 83.5 years (range 65–98 years), and most (53, 70.7%) were women. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality associated with COVID-19 infection. Results: The COVID-19 infection rate was 26.7% (20 patients), with a significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate in the COVID-19-positive group (10/20, 50%) compared to the COVID-19-negative group (4/55, 7.3%), with mean time to death of 19.8 days (95% confidence interval: 17.0–22.5). The mean time from admission to surgery was 43.1 h and 38.3 h, in COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative groups, respectively. All COVID-19-positive patients had shown symptoms of fever and cough, and all 10 cases who died were hypoxic. Seven (35%) cases had radiological lung findings consistent of viral pneumonitis which resulted in mortality (70% of mortality). 30% ( n = 6) contracted the COVID-19 infection in the community, and 70% ( n = 14) developed symptoms after hospital admission. Conclusion: Hip fractures associated with COVID-19 infection have a high 30-day mortality. COVID-19 testing and chest X-ray for patients presenting with hip fractures help in early planning of high-risk surgeries and allow counselling of the patients and family using realistic prognosis.

Download Full-text

IoT-Based Patient Movement Monitoring: The Post-Operative Hip Fracture Rehabilitation Model

Future Internet ◽

10.3390/fi13080195 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (8) ◽

pp. 195

Author(s):

Akash Gupta ◽

Adnan Al-Anbuky

Keyword(s):

Hip Fracture ◽

Real Time ◽

System Performance ◽

Digital Health ◽

Time Behavior ◽

Functional Requirements ◽

Rehabilitation Process ◽

Rehabilitation Model ◽

The Impact ◽

Movement Monitoring

Hip fracture incidence is life-threatening and has an impact on the person’s physical functionality and their ability to live independently. Proper rehabilitation with a set program can play a significant role in recovering the person’s physical mobility, boosting their quality of life, reducing adverse clinical outcomes, and shortening hospital stays. The Internet of Things (IoT), with advancements in digital health, could be leveraged to enhance the backup intelligence used in the rehabilitation process and provide transparent coordination and information about movement during activities among relevant parties. This paper presents a post-operative hip fracture rehabilitation model that clarifies the involved rehabilitation process, its associated events, and the main physical movements of interest across all stages of care. To support this model, the paper proposes an IoT-enabled movement monitoring system architecture. The architecture reflects the key operational functionalities required to monitor patients in real time and throughout the rehabilitation process. The approach was tested incrementally on ten healthy subjects, particularly for factors relevant to the recognition and tracking of movements of interest. The analysis reflects the significance of personalization and the significance of a one-minute history of data in monitoring the real-time behavior. This paper also looks at the impact of edge computing at the gateway and a wearable sensor edge on system performance. The approach provides a solution for an architecture that balances system performance with remote monitoring functional requirements.

Download Full-text

Impact of Rehabilitation Dose on Nutritional Status at Discharge from a Convalescent Rehabilitation Ward in Malnourished Patients with Hip Fracture

Healthcare ◽

10.3390/healthcare9060722 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (6) ◽

pp. 722

Author(s):

Yusuke Ito ◽

Hidetaka Wakabayashi ◽

Shinta Nishioka ◽

Shin Nomura ◽

Ryo Momosaki

Keyword(s):

Logistic Regression ◽

Regression Analysis ◽

Hip Fracture ◽

Nutritional Status ◽

Logistic Regression Analysis ◽

Short Form ◽

Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Rehabilitation Ward ◽

The Impact

The object of this study is to determine the impact of the rehabilitation dose on the nutritional status at discharge from a convalescent rehabilitation ward in malnourished patients with hip fracture. This retrospective case-control study involved malnourished patients with hip fracture aged 65 years or older who had been admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation ward and whose data were registered in the Japan Rehabilitation Nutrition Database. The primary outcome was nutritional status at discharge. Patients were classified according to whether nutritional status was improved or not at discharge, according to the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form® (MNA-SF) score. The association between improved nutritional status and rehabilitation dose was assessed by a logistic regression analysis. Data were available for 145 patients (27 men, 118 women; mean age 85.1 ± 7.9 years). Daily rehabilitation dose was 109.5 (median 94.6–116.2) min and the MNA-SF score at admission was 5 (median 4–6). Nutritional status was improved in 97 patients and not improved in 48. Logistic regression analysis showed the following factors to be independently associated with nutritional status at discharge: Functional Independence Measure score (OR 1.042, 95% CI 1.016–1.068), energy intake (OR 1.002 CI 1.000–1.004), daily rehabilitation dose (OR 1.023, 95% CI 1.002–1.045), and length of hospital stay (OR 1.026, 95% CI 1.003–1.049). The daily rehabilitation dose in malnourished patients with hip fracture may positively impact nutritional status at discharge.

Download Full-text

Meta-analysis and metaregression of risk factors associated with mortality in hip fracture patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-89617-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Firas J. Raheman ◽

Djamila M. Rojoa ◽

Jvalant Nayan Parekh ◽

Reshid Berber ◽

Robert Ashford

Keyword(s):

Hip Fracture ◽

Hip Fractures ◽

Case Fatality Rate ◽

Excess Mortality ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Case Fatality ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Fatality Rate ◽

Increased Risk ◽

The Impact

AbstractIncidence of hip fractures has remained unchanged during the pandemic with overlapping vulnerabilities observed in patients with hip fractures and those infected with COVID-19. We aimed to investigate the independent impact of COVID-19 infection on the mortality of these patients. Healthcare databases were systematically searched over 2-weeks from 1st–14th November 2020 to identify eligible studies assessing the impact of COVID-19 on hip fracture patients. Meta-analysis of proportion was performed to obtain pooled values of prevalence, incidence and case fatality rate of hip fracture patients with COVID-19 infection. 30-day mortality, excess mortality and all-cause mortality were analysed using a mixed-effects model. 22 studies reporting 4015 patients were identified out of which 2651 (66%) were assessed during the pandemic. An excess mortality of 10% was seen for hip fractures treated during the pandemic (OR 2.00, p = 0.007), in comparison to the pre-pandemic controls (5%). Estimated mortality of COVID-19 positive hip fracture patients was four-fold (RR 4.59, p < 0.0001) and 30-day mortality was 38.0% (HR 4.73, p < 0.0001). The case fatality rate for COVID-19 positive patients was 34.74%. Between-study heterogeneity for the pooled analysis was minimal (I2 = 0.00) whereas, random effects metaregression identified subgroup heterogeneity for male gender (p < 0.001), diabetes (p = 0.002), dementia (p = 0.001) and extracapsular fractures (p = 0.01) increased risk of mortality in COVID-19 positive patients.

Download Full-text

Orthogeriatrics and Hip Fracture Care in the UK: Factors Driving Change to More Integrated Models of Care

Geriatrics ◽

10.3390/geriatrics3030055 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 3 (3) ◽

pp. 55 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Mark Middleton

Keyword(s):

Hip Fracture ◽

Financial Incentives ◽

Models Of Care ◽

Social Needs ◽

Medical Rehabilitation ◽

Integrated Models ◽

National Guidelines ◽

Fracture Care ◽

The Uk ◽

The Impact

In the United Kingdom (UK), approximately 80,000 hip fractures each year result in an estimated annual cost of two billion pounds in direct healthcare costs alone. Various models of care exist for collaboration between orthopaedic surgeons and geriatricians in response to the complex medical, rehabilitation, and social needs of this patient group. Mounting evidence suggests that more integrated models of orthogeriatric care result in superior quality of care indicators and clinical outcomes. Clinical governance through national guidelines, audit through the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD), and financial incentives through the Best Practice Tariff (providing a £1335 bonus for each patient) have driven hip fracture care in the UK forward. The demanded improvement in quality indicators has increased the popularity of collaborative care models and particularly integrated orthogeriatric services. A significant fall in 30-day mortality has resulted nationally. Ongoing data collection by the NHFD will lead to greater understanding of the impact of all elements of hip fracture care including models of orthogeriatrics.

Download Full-text

The impact of oral anticoagulation on time to surgery in patients hospitalized with hip fracture

Thrombosis Research ◽

10.1016/j.thromres.2015.09.017 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 136 (5) ◽

pp. 962-965 ◽

Cited By ~ 42

Author(s):

Thomas Tran ◽

Aurélien Delluc ◽

Carine de Wit ◽

William Petrcich ◽

Grégoire Le Gal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hip Fracture ◽

Oral Anticoagulation ◽

Time To Surgery ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

Body Anthropometry and Bone Strength Conjointly Determine the Risk of Hip Fracture in a Sideways Fall

Annals of Biomedical Engineering ◽

10.1007/s10439-020-02682-y ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Marco Palanca ◽

Egon Perilli ◽

Saulo Martelli

Keyword(s):

Hip Fracture ◽

Bone Strength ◽

Impact Energy ◽

Fracture Pattern ◽

Bone Morphology ◽

Fracture Dynamics ◽

Soft Tissue Thickness ◽

Definition Of ◽

The Impact ◽

Sideways Fall

AbstractWe hypothesize that variations of body anthropometry, conjointly with the bone strength, determine the risk of hip fracture. To test the hypothesis, we compared, in a simulated sideways fall, the hip impact energy to the energy needed to fracture the femur. Ten femurs from elderly donors were tested using a novel drop-tower protocol for replicating the hip fracture dynamics during a fall on the side. The impact energy was varied for each femur according to the donor’s body weight, height and soft-tissue thickness, by adjusting the drop height and mass. The fracture pattern, force, energy, strain in the superior femoral neck, bone morphology and microarchitecture were evaluated. Fracture patterns were consistent with clinically relevant hip fractures, and the superior neck strains and timings were comparable with the literature. The hip impact energy (11 – 95 J) and the fracture energy (11 – 39 J) ranges overlapped and showed comparable variance (CV = 69 and 61%, respectively). The aBMD-based definition of osteoporosis correctly classified 7 (70%) fracture/non-fracture cases. The incorrectly classified cases presented large impact energy variations, morphology variations and large subcortical voids as seen in microcomputed tomography. In conclusion, the risk of osteoporotic hip fracture in a sideways fall depends on both body anthropometry and bone strength.

Download Full-text

The impact of cognitive impairment at admission on short-term functional outcome of elderly hip fracture patients

Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo ◽

10.2298/sarh1006319d ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 138 (5-6) ◽

pp. 319-322 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Emilija Dubljanin-Raspopovic ◽

Dragana Matanovic ◽

Marko Bumbasirevic

Keyword(s):

Cognitive Impairment ◽

Hip Fracture ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Cognitive Status ◽

Cognitively Impaired ◽

Short Term ◽

Functional Gain ◽

The Impact ◽

Cognitively Intact

Introduction The number of patents with dementia increases among hip fracture patients. Cognitive dysfunction is defined as a premorbid state which is potentionally negatively related to short-term functional outcome. Objective To assess the relationship between cognitive status on admission and functional gain during an early rehabilitation period in elderly hip fracture patients. Methods Forty-five elderly patients with surgically treated hip fracture were examined. Cognitive status was assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) at admission; functional status was assessed by the motor subscale of Functional Independence Measure (FIM) at admission and before discharge, while absolute functional gain was determined by the motor FIM gain (FIM discharge - FIM admission). Absolute functional gain was analyzed in respect to cognitive status. Results Both cognitively impaired and cognitively intact hip fracture patients exhibited overall FIM motor improvements, as well as functional gains in specific FIM motor areas (p<0.01). Absolute functional gain, however, was higher in 1) cognitively intact compared to cognitively impaired patients (p<0.01), and 2) cognitively moderately impaired patients compared to severely cognitively impaired patients (p<0.01). No difference in functional gain was detected between the patients with moderately cognitively impaired compared to the cognitive intact patients (p>0.05). Conclusion The systematic use of MMSE identifies cognitively impaired hip fracture patients, and effectively predicts their short-term functional outcome. A higher admission cognitive status is related to a more favorable short term rehabilitation outcome. In spite of cognitive impairment, elderly patients with hip fracture can benefit from participation in rehabilitation programmes. The systematic identification of cognitively impaired hip fracture patients at admission facilitates optimal treatment and rehabilitation, and thus enables the best achievable outcome to be reached.

Download Full-text

The impact of an orthogeriatric intervention in patients with fragility fractures: A cohort study

10.21203/rs.2.13090/v3 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Charlotte Abrahamsen ◽

Birgitte Nørgaard ◽

Eva Draborg ◽

Morten Frost Nielsen

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Hip Fracture ◽

Postoperative Complications ◽

Fragility Fractures ◽

High Energy ◽

Historical Cohort ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Observational Cohort ◽

The Impact ◽

Acute Patients

Abstract Background: While orthogeriatric care to patients with hip fractures is established, the impact of similar intervention in patients with fragility fractures in general is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to assess the impact of an orthogeriatric intervention on postoperative complications and readmissions among patients admitted due to and surgically treated for fragility fractures. Methods: A prospective observational cohort study with a retrospective control was designed. A new orthogeriatric unit for acute patients of sixty-five years or older with fragility fractures in terms of hip, vertebral or appendicular fractures was opened on March 1, 2014. Patients were excluded if the fracture was cancer-related or caused by high-energy trauma, if the patient was operated on at another hospital, treated conservatively with no operation, or had been readmitted within the last month due to fracture-related complications. Results: We included 591 patients; 170 in the historical cohort and 421 in the orthogeriatric cohort. No significant differences were found between the two cohorts with regard to the proportion of participants experiencing complications (24.5% versus 28.3%, p = 0.36) or readmission within 30 days after discharge (14.1% vs 12.1%, p = 0.5). With both cohorts collapsed and adjusting for age, gender and CCI, the odds of having postoperative complications as a hip fracture patient was 4.45, compared to patients with an appendicular fracture (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with complications during admission were at a higher risk of readmission within 30 days than were patients without complications (22.3% vs 9.5%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: In older patients admitted with fragility fractures, our model of orthogeriatric care showed no significant differences regarding postoperative complications or readmissions compared to the traditional care. However, we found significantly higher odds of having postoperative complications among patients admitted with a hip fracture compared to other fragility fractures. Additionally, our study reveals an increased risk of being readmitted within 30 days for patients with postoperative complications.

Download Full-text