scholarly journals Interrater Variability in Pain Assessment of Long-term Care Residents with Dementia

Author(s):  
Valérie Vitou ◽  
Marie-Christine Gély-Nargeot ◽  
Sophie Bayard
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 307-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle M Gagnon ◽  
Thomas Hadjistavropoulos ◽  
Jaime Williams

INTRODUCTION: Inadequacies in pain assessment and management in long-term care have been well documented. Insufficient pain education and inaccurate beliefs about the nature of pain and aging have been identified as possible contributors. The present study addresses the need for improved, efficient and feasible continuing pain education through the use of an assessment training video.METHODS: A total of 148 long-term care staff viewed and evaluated the training video. Knowledge changes and pain beliefs were assessed postvideo and at a four-week follow-up. Beliefs about pain, as well as pain and aging, were also examined using multivariate procedures to determine whether these variables influenced participants’ evaluation of the video. Focus groups were also conducted, and transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis.RESULTS: Pain assessment knowledge improved postvideo and at the four-week follow-up. Participants positively evaluated the content and quality of the video. Individuals who held stronger beliefs (at baseline) about the organic nature of pain provided more positive evaluations. Barriers to implementation of practices in the video identified by the focus groups (and qualitative analysis) included time, workload and resistance to change. Facilitators to implementation included continued management support and observing the benefits to implementation.DISCUSSION: The present study provides support for the use of video training. However, based on the focus group results, top-down implementation approaches with ongoing management involvement throughout the implementation process may be needed to achieve sustained changes in pain assessment practices. A model useful for sustained implementation was proposed and discussed, and is hoped to facilitate future research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha L. Gallant ◽  
Allie Peckham ◽  
Gregory Marchildon ◽  
Thomas Hadjistavropoulos ◽  
Blair Roblin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Among Canadian residents living in long-term care (LTC) facilities, and especially among those with limited ability to communicate due to dementia, pain remains underassessed and undermanaged. Although evidence-based clinical guidelines for the assessment and management of pain exist, these clinical guidelines are not widely implemented in LTC facilities. A relatively unexplored avenue for change is the influence that statutes and regulations could exert on pain practices within LTC. This review is therefore aimed at identifying the current landscape of policy levers used across Canada to assess and manage pain among LTC residents and to evaluate the extent to which they are concordant with evidence-based clinical guidelines proposed by an international consensus group consisting of both geriatric pain and public policy experts. Methods Using scoping review methodology, a search for peer-reviewed journal articles and government documents pertaining to pain in Canadian LTC facilities was carried out. This scoping review was complemented by an in-depth case analysis of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Ontario statutes and regulations. Results Across provinces, pain was highly prevalent and was associated with adverse consequences among LTC residents. The considerable benefits of using a standardized pain assessment protocol, along with the barriers in implementing such a protocol, were identified. For most provinces, pain assessment and management in LTC residents was not specifically addressed in their statutes or regulations. In Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Ontario, regulations mandate the use of the interRAI suite of assessment tools for the assessment and reporting of pain. Conclusion The prevalence of pain and the benefits of implementing standardized pain assessment protocols has been reported in the research literature. Despite occasional references to pain, however, existing regulations do not recommend assessments of pain at the frequency specified by experts. Insufficient direction on the use of specialized pain assessment tools (especially in the case of those with limited ability to communicate) that minimize reliance on subjective judgements was also identified in current regulations. Existing policies therefore fail to adequately address the underassessment and undermanagement of pain in older adults residing in LTC facilities in ways that are aligned with expert consensus.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Hadjistavropoulos ◽  
Jaime Williams ◽  
Sharon Kaasalainen ◽  
Paulette V. Hunter ◽  
Maryse L. Savoie ◽  
...  

Background. Although feasible protocols for pain assessment and management in long-term care (LTC) have been developed, these have not been implemented on a large-scale basis.Objective. To implement a program of regular pain assessment in two LTC facilities, using implementation science principles, and to evaluate the process and success of doing so.Methods. The implementation protocol included a pain assessment workshop and the establishment of a nurse Pain Champion. Quality indicators were tracked before and after implementation. Focus groups and interviews with staff were also conducted.Results. The implementation effort was successful in increasing and regularizing pain assessments. This was sustained during the follow-up period. Staff members reported enthusiasm about the protocol at baseline and positive results following its implementation. Despite the success in increasing assessments, we did not identify changes in the percentages of patients reported as having moderate-to-severe pain.Discussion. It is our hope that our feasibility demonstration will encourage more facilities to improve their pain assessment/management practices.Conclusions. It is feasible to implement regular and systematic pain assessment in LTC. Future research should focus on ensuring effective clinical practices in response to assessment results, and determination of longer-term sustainability.


2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 727-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine van Kooten ◽  
Martin Smalbrugge ◽  
Johannes C. van der Wouden ◽  
Max L. Stek ◽  
Cees M.P.M. Hertogh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document