The risk factors for avian influenza on poultry farms: A meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youming Wang ◽  
Peng Li ◽  
Yangli Wu ◽  
Xiangdong Sun ◽  
Kangzhen Yu ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tulsi Ram Gompo ◽  
Bikash Raj Shah ◽  
Surendra Karki ◽  
Pragya Koirala ◽  
Manju Maharjan ◽  
...  

AbstractPoultry sector contributes to four percent in national GDP of Nepal. However, this sector is under threat with periodic outbreaks of Avian Influenza (AI) subtypes H5 and H9 since 2009. This has been both a both public health threat and an economic issue. Since last three years, outbreaks of AI subtype H9 has caused huge economic losses in major poultry producing areas of Nepal. However, the risk factors associated with these outbreaks have not been assessed. A retrospective case-control study was conducted from April 2018 to May 2019 in Kathmandu Valley to understand the risk factors associated with AI subtype H9 outbreaks. Out of 100 farms selected, 50 were “case” farms, confirmed positive to H9 at Central Veterinary Laboratory, Kathmandu, and other 50 farms were “control” farms, matched for farm size and locality within a radius of three km from the case farm. Each farm was visited to collect information using semi-structured questionnaire. Nineteen potential risk factors were included in the questionnaire under the broad categories: birds and farm characteristics, management aspects and biosecurity status of the farms. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted to calculate corresponding odds ratios. Identified risk factors associated with AI subtype H9 outbreaks in Kathmandu valley were: “Birds of age 31-40 days” (OR= 11.31, 95% CI: 1.31-98.02, p=0.028), “Older farms operating for >5 years” (OR= 10.9, 95% CI: 1.76-66.93, p=0.01), “Commercial layers farms” (OR=36.0, 95% CI: 0.97-1332.40, p=0.052), “Used stream water to water birds (OR= 5.7, 95% CI: 1.10-30.13, p=0.039)”, “Farms without practice of fumigation after each batch of poultry (OR= 4, 95% CI: 1.44-13.13, p=0.009)., “Farm with previous history of AI (OR= 13.8, 95% CI: 1.34-143.63, p = 0.028), “Did not applied farm boots (OR= 2.58, 95% CI: 0.98-6.80, p= 0.055), “Visitors allowed to enter the farms (OR= 2.5, 95% CI: 1.011-6.17, p = 0.047) and “No foot bath at entry of farms (OR= 3.3, 95% CI: 1.29-8.38, p = 0.013). This study depicts that outbreaks of AI subtype H9 in Kathmandu valley was related to poor management practices and biosecurity in the poultry farms. We suggest improving management practices and increase biosecurity in the farms to reduce incidences of AI subtype H9 outbreaks in Kathmandu valley.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. e0223550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tulsi Ram Gompo ◽  
Bikas Raj Shah ◽  
Surendra Karki ◽  
Pragya Koirala ◽  
Manju Maharjan ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e0119019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamoona Chaudhry ◽  
Hamad B. Rashid ◽  
Michael Thrusfield ◽  
Sue Welburn ◽  
Barend MdeC. Bronsvoort

2005 ◽  
Vol 226 (5) ◽  
pp. 767-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer H. McQuiston ◽  
Lindsey P. Garber ◽  
Barbara A. Porter-Spalding ◽  
John W. Hahn ◽  
F. William Pierson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document