Mood and anxiety disorders in Australia and New Zealand's indigenous populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 255 ◽  
pp. 128-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Black ◽  
Steve Kisely ◽  
Karolina Alichniewicz ◽  
Maree Toombs
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Indigenous Populations ◽  
Mood And Anxiety Disorders

scholarly journals The risk of offspring mood and anxiety disorders in the context of prenatal maternal somatic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2022 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiayu Gong ◽  
Zhixin Fan ◽  
Hanfang Xu ◽  
Hanzhang Wang ◽  
Ningxi Zeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Mood Disorders ◽  
Maternal Obesity ◽  
Polycystic Ovary ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mood And Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Somatic Diseases

Abstract Aims The importance of prenatal maternal somatic diseases for offspring mood and anxiety disorders may be overlooked or undervalued. We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the risk of offspring mood and anxiety disorders in the context of prenatal maternal somatic diseases. Methods We screened articles indexed in Embase (including Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed-not-MEDLINE), PsycARTICLES and PsycINFO databases up to August 2021. 21 studies were included. We examined the overall associations between prenatal maternal somatic diseases and offspring mood/anxiety disorders. Analyses were stratified according to maternal somatic diseases and follow-up duration. Results We observed an increased risk of mood and anxiety disorders in the context of prenatal maternal somatic diseases [relative risk (RR) = 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.37, RR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.24–1.38]; maternal obesity(RR = 1.92; 95% CI 1.72–2.11), hypertensive disorders (RR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.11–1.86) and infertility (RR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.14–1.39) were risk factors for mood disorders; maternal polycystic ovary syndrome (RR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.42–1.80), severe obesity (RR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.44–1.68) and moderate obesity (RR = 1.36; 95% CI 1.28–1.44) were risk factors for anxiety disorders. Prenatal maternal somatic diseases increased the risk of mood disorders in childhood and adulthood (RR = 1.71; 95% CI 1.34–2.09/RR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.09–1.30), as well as the risk of anxiety disorders in adulthood (RR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.26–1.41). Conclusion The results indicate that prenatal maternal somatic diseases are associated with offspring mood and anxiety disorders, and that the associations may be long-lasting.

scholarly journals Co‐morbidity between mood and anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukanta Saha ◽  
Carmen C. W. Lim ◽  
Danielle L. Cannon ◽  
Lucinda Burton ◽  
Monique Bremner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mood And Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Co Morbidity

scholarly journals Gaps in Understanding of the Epidemiology of Mood and Anxiety Disorders among Migrant Groups in Canada: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
pp. 595-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Edwards ◽  
Malini Hu ◽  
Amardeep Thind ◽  
Saverio Stranges ◽  
Maria Chiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Reference Group ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Mood And Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Migrant Groups

Objective:Estimates of mood and anxiety disorders are highly variable among migrant groups, as they are influenced by the socio-political context. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize available Canadian evidence on the prevalence and incidence of mood and anxiety disorders among migrant groups.Methods:Studies were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. They were included if they used population-based samples, presented data on the incidence or prevalence of diagnosed or self-reported mood or anxiety disorders for first-generation migrant groups in Canada, and used a Canadian-born or long-term resident reference group.Results:Nineteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Prevalence ratios ranged from 0.48 to 0.87, and nearly all estimates were obtained from population health surveys. Prevalence estimates among migrant groups were lower than the reference group, with the 90th percentile of estimates ranging from 1.5% to 8.2%. Risk factors for mood and anxiety disorders among migrants included being female, younger, unemployed, having lower income, and living in neighborhoods with a lower proportion of migrants.Conclusions:There remain many gaps in our current understanding of mood and anxiety disorders among migrant groups in Canada. Although evidence suggests the prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders are consistently lower among migrant groups, a lack of incidence estimates limits the strength of this conclusion. Future research should focus on comparisons of self-reported and diagnosed estimates, the use of a range of different primary or secondary data sources, and consideration of important risk factors.Prospero Citation:Jordan Edwards, Malini Hu, Amardeep Thind, Saverio Stranges, Maria Chiu, Kelly Anderson. The burden of mood and anxiety disorders among immigrant and refugee populations in Canada: a systematic review. PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018087869 Available from: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018087869 .

scholarly journals Hatha yoga for acute, chronic and/or treatment-resistant mood and anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. e0204925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina K. Vollbehr ◽  
Agna A. Bartels-Velthuis ◽  
Maaike H. Nauta ◽  
Stynke Castelein ◽  
Laura A. Steenhuis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hatha Yoga ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Mood And Anxiety Disorders

scholarly journals Psychotic, Mood, and Anxiety Disorders and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
pp. 838-849
Author(s):  
Célia Kowal ◽  
Hugo Peyre ◽  
Ali Amad ◽  
Antoine Pelissolo ◽  
Marion Leboyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mood And Anxiety Disorders

Periodontal disease inequities among Indigenous populations: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Nath ◽  
Brianna Poirier ◽  
Xiangqun Ju ◽  
Kostas Kapellas ◽  
Dandara Haag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Periodontal Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Indigenous Populations

scholarly journals Indigenous Groups and Influenza: Protocol For A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Evelin Alves ◽  
Ole Røgeberg ◽  
Svenn-Erik Mamelund
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Indigenous Populations ◽  
Influenza Pandemics ◽  
Indigenous Groups ◽  
Combining Data ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Academic Search ◽  
Historical Periods

Abstract Background: Several studies have documented that indigenous groups have been disproportionally hit by previous pandemics, with some exceptions. The objective of this review and meta-analysis is to provide a comprehensive historical overview of pre-COVID impact of influenza on indigenous groups by combining data from the last five influenza pandemics and seasonal influenza up to date. Methods/Principle Findings: The review will include peer-reviewed original studies published in English, Spanish, Portuguese, Swedish, Danish and Norwegian. Records will be identified through systematic literature search in eight databases: Embase, Medline, Cinahl, Web of Science, Academic Search Ultimate, SocIndex, ASSIA and Google Scholar. Results will be summarized narratively and using meta-analytic strategies. Discussion: To our knowledge, there is no systematic review combining historical data on the impact of both seasonal and pandemic influenza on indigenous populations. By summarizing results across indigenous groups in different countries and historical periods, we aim to provide information on how strong the risk for influenza is among indigenous people, and how consistent this risk is across groups, areas and time. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021246391

Two decades of digital interventions for anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effectiveness

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Darin Pauley ◽  
Pim Cuijpers ◽  
Davide Papola ◽  
Clara Miguel ◽  
Eirini Karyotaki
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Wait List ◽  
Digital Interventions ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Digital interventions for anxiety disorders are a promising solution to address barriers to evidence-based treatment access. Precise and powerful estimates of digital intervention effectiveness for anxiety disorders are necessary for further adoption in practice. The present systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of digital interventions across all anxiety disorders and specific to each disorder v. wait-list and care-as-usual controls. Methods A systematic search of bibliographic databases identified 15 030 abstracts from inception to 1 January 2020. Forty-seven randomized controlled trials (53 comparisons; 4958 participants) contributed to the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted by an anxiety disorder, risk of bias, treatment support, recruitment, location and treatment adherence. Results A large, pooled effect size of g = 0.80 [95% Confidence Interval: 0.68–0.93] was found in favor of digital interventions. Moderate to large pooled effect sizes favoring digital interventions were found for generalized anxiety disorder (g = 0.62), mixed anxiety samples (g = 0.68), panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (g = 1.08) and social anxiety disorder (g = 0.76) subgroups. No subgroups were significantly different or related to the pooled effect size. Notably, the effects of guided interventions (g = 0.84) and unguided interventions (g = 0.64) were not significantly different. Supplemental analysis comparing digital and face-to-face interventions (9 comparisons; 683 participants) found no significant difference in effect [g = 0.14 favoring digital interventions; Confidence Interval: −0.01 to 0.30]. Conclusion The precise and powerful estimates found further justify the application of digital interventions for anxiety disorders in place of wait-list or usual care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document