Wastewater treatment technology selection under various influent conditions and effluent standards based on life cycle assessment

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 104562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yizhen Zhang ◽  
Chi Zhang ◽  
Yong Qiu ◽  
Bing Li ◽  
Hongtao Pang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 299 ◽  
pp. 02006
Author(s):  
Siyi Wang ◽  
Zixiang Ji ◽  
Yumin Wang

Decentralized wastewater treatment technology, especially natural ecological treatment technology has widely been used in rural regions. In this paper, a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) of a typical wastewater ecological treatment technology - artificial wetland technology was conducted. SimaPro software was applied to simulate the wastewater treatment facility, and the CML2 baseline2000 impact evaluation method was selected to analyze the environmental loads and benefits during the life cycle. The environmental impact of the facility adopting grey-black separation mode is compared with that of the unified collection and treatment model to provide scientific basis and suggestions for the selection of wastewater collection and treatment model. The results indicated that the main environmental impact of the Southeast University artificial wetland system comes from the construction and operation of the artificial wetland and aeration tank. Marine water ecotoxicity is the main impact factor, followed by freshwater water ecotoxicity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 80-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Parra-Saldivar ◽  
Muhammad Bilal ◽  
Hafiz M.N. Iqbal

ACS Omega ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (42) ◽  
pp. 27733-27733
Author(s):  
Faiza Niaz ◽  
Qasim Khan ◽  
Mustafa Ali ◽  
Wenxing Shen

2014 ◽  
Vol 535 ◽  
pp. 346-349
Author(s):  
Mei Wang ◽  
Ming Yang ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Jian Fen Li

Effect and benefits of a product or service could be analyzed and evaluated by life cycle assessment during the whole life cycle. Urban sewage treatment plants could improve and control urban water pollution escalating, but it also had certain harm to environment. Effect and benefits of urban wastewater treatment plant A and B were analyzed and evaluated, 13 factors were selected, and comprehensive benefits were researched quantificationally using the method of analytic hierarchy process. It found that urban wastewater treatment plant A who applied A/O process had better benefits than urban wastewater treatment plant B who applied BIOLAK process.


2021 ◽  
pp. 83-89
Author(s):  
Abeer Ali Khan

As the high demand of energy of the developing countries is met by importing energy and different energy technology, it has become increasingly necessary to discuss the environmental impacts throughout the life cycle of those technologies and make better decisions. Developed in the late 1960s, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has become a wide-ranging tool used to determine impacts of products or systems over several environmental and resource issues. The LCA approach has become more prevalent in research, industry and policy with growing concern for the environment. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to introduce the use of LCA in the decision-making process while selecting an energy technology. In this way, more environmentally conscious decisions will be made as LCAs can provide a better basis for this process.


Author(s):  
Farhad Sakhaee

Abstract: Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a tool to evaluate environmental impacts based on products of a process. This research is a case study of wastewater treatment facilities of ERTC (Environmental Resources Training Center), SIUE University, based on available data for two semi-annual sludge quantities (year 2015) from sludge management report. The aim of this study is to compare set of possibilities for a wastewater treatment facility at ERTC. The simulation has been done through SimaPro model. Electricity and methane were considered and the cumulative weight of their impacts has been investigated. Total solids for two semi-annual sludge has been fed to the model in kilogram and different production (electricity and methane) configuration were investigated. The most plausible configuration based on the cumulative environmental impact proposed as best practical solution.


2013 ◽  
Vol 04 (09) ◽  
pp. 1018-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica C. Rothermel ◽  
Amy E. Landis ◽  
William J. Barr ◽  
Kullapa Soratana ◽  
Kayla M. Reddington ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document