scholarly journals Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients treated for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: Incidence, clinical features, and prognosis based on population-level data from Hungary

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 100113
Author(s):  
András Jánosi ◽  
Tamás Ferenci ◽  
János Tomcsányi ◽  
Péter Andréka
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 6-11
Author(s):  
S. A. Okrugin ◽  
A. B. Lvova ◽  
A. N. Repin

Aim. To compare the circumstances of the prehospital deaths among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Tomsk in 1984 and 2018.Methods. Population-level data were collected from the WHO project “Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry”. In 1984, 739 cases of AMI were recorded, in 2018 - 924 ones. 262 (35.5%) and 359 (38.9%) deaths occurred in the acute phase, respectively. Of them, 158 (60.3%) and 148 (41.2%) patients died in the prehospital setting. 66 (41.8%) and 46 (31.1%) cases of deaths were selected for further analysis.Results. In 2018, the number of patients who did not receive timely medical care decreased from 74.2% to 52.2%, compared to 1984 (p <0.05). The number of cases when patients failed to call the ambulance due to a rapid loss of consciousness (cardiac arrest) or managed to call, but died before the ambulance arrived, was similar. The number of death among patients who received emergency medical services (EMS) increased from 25.8% to 47.9% (p <0.05).Conclusion. Prehospital mortality from AMI in Tomsk has improved over thirty years, but not drastically. Despite the number of patients who died before the first medical contact has decreased, they still make up about half of all cases. Every 4th-5th patient fails to contact EMS. In terms of reducing prehospital mortality, measures focused on the regular clinical examination of patients with cardiovascular diseases seem to be more promising for effective secondary prevention of coronary artery disease and AMI.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Thoegersen ◽  
M Frydland ◽  
O Helgestad ◽  
LO Jensen ◽  
J Josiassen ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Lundbeck Foundation OnBehalf Critical Cardiac Care Research Group Background Approximately half of all patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) present with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Cardiogenic shock due to OHCA is caused by abrupt cessation of circulation, whereas AMICS without OHCA is due to cardiac failure with low cardiac output. Thus, there may also be differences between the two conditions in terms of blood borne biomarkers. Purpose To explore the potential differences in the admission plasma concentrations of biomarkers reflecting tissue perfusion (lactate), neuroendocrine response (mid-regional proadrenomedullin [MRproADM], Copeptin, pro-atrial natriuretic peptide [proANP]), endothelial damage (Syndecan-1, soluble thrombomodulin [sTM]), inflammation (soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 [sST2]) and kidney injury (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL]), in patients with AMICS presenting with or without OHCA. Method Consecutive patients admitted for acute coronary angiography due to suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were enrolled during a 1-year period. A total of 2,713 patients were screened. In the present study 86 patients with confirmed STEMI and CS at admission were included. Results Patients with OHCA (had significantly higher median admission concentrations of Lactate (6,9 mmol/L vs. 3.4 mmol/L p &lt;0.001), NGAL (220 ng/ml  vs 150 ng/ml p = 0.046), sTM (10 ng/ml vs. 8.0  ng/ml p = 0.026) and Syndecan-1 (160 ng/ml vs. 120 ng/ml p= 0.015) and significantly lower concentrations of MR-proADM (0.85 nmol/L  vs. 1.6 nmol/L p &lt;0.001) and sST2 (39 ng/ml vs. 62 ng/ml p &lt; 0.001).  After adjusting for age, sex, and time from symptom onset to coronary angiography, lactate (p = 0.008), NGAL (p = 0.03) and sTM (p = 0.011) were still significantly higher in patients presenting with OHCA while sST2 was still significantly lower (p = 0.029). There was very little difference in 30-day mortality between the OHCA and non-OHCA groups (OHCA 37% vs. non-OHCA 38%). Conclusion Patients with STEMI and CS at admission with or without concomitant OHCA had similar 30-day mortality but differed in terms of Lactate, NGAL, sTM and sST2 levels at the time of admission to catheterization laboratory. These findings propose that non-OHCA and OHCA patients with CS could be considered as two individual clinical entities. Abstract Figure. Level of biomarkers OHCA vs. non-OHCA


2010 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
pp. 1651-1657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Maruhashi ◽  
Masaharu Ishihara ◽  
Ichirou Inoue ◽  
Takuji Kawagoe ◽  
Yuji Shimatani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document