Opioid Prescribing Practices in the Emergency Department: Determining the Need for Opioid Education

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. e35
Author(s):  
Morgan Portner ◽  
Vibhuti Arya ◽  
Maria Gemelli
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescribing

scholarly journals P113: Examining emergency physicians’ self-reported opioid prescribing practices for the treatment of acute pain: A Newfoundland perspective

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S105-S106
Author(s):  
P. Doran ◽  
G. Sheppard ◽  
B. Metcalfe
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Ensure Patient Safety ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines

Introduction: Canadians are the second largest consumers of prescription opioids per capita in the world. Emergency physicians tend to prescribe stronger and larger quantities of opioids, while family physicians write the most opioid prescriptions overall. These practices have been shown to precipitate future dependence, toxicity and the need for hospitalization. Despite this emerging evidence, there is a paucity of research on emergency physicians’ opioid prescribing practices in Canada. The objectives of this study were to describe our local emergency physicians’ opioid prescribing patterns both in the emergency department and upon discharge, and to explore factors that impact their prescribing decisions. Methods: Emergency physicians from two urban, adult emergency departments in St. John's, Newfoundland were anonymously surveyed using a web-based survey tool. All 42 physicians were invited to participate via email during the six-week study period and reminders were sent at weeks two and four. Results: A total of 21 participants responded to the survey. Over half of respondents (57.14%) reported that they “often” prescribe opioids for the treatment of acute pain in the emergency department, and an equal number of respondents reported doing so “sometimes” at discharge. Eighty-five percent of respondents reported most commonly prescribing intravenous morphine for acute pain in the emergency department, and over thirty-five percent reported most commonly prescribing oral morphine upon discharge. Patient age and risk of misuse were the most frequently cited factors that influenced respondents’ prescribing decisions. Only 4 of the 22 respondents reported using evidence-based guidelines to tailor their opioid prescribing practices, while an overwhelming majority (80.95%) believe there is a need for evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines for the treatment of acute pain. Sixty percent of respondents completed additional training in safe opioid prescribing, yet less than half of respondents (42.86%) felt they could help to mitigate the opioid crisis by prescribing fewer opioids in the emergency department. Conclusion: Emergency physicians frequently prescribe opioids for the treatment of acute pain and new evidence suggests that this practice can lead to significant morbidity. While further research is needed to better understand emergency physicians’ opioid prescribing practices, our findings support the need for evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of acute pain to ensure patient safety.

Disparities in Analgesia and Opioid Prescribing Practices for Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain in the Emergency Department

2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Kaye Heins ◽  
Alan Heins ◽  
Marianthe Grammas ◽  
Melissa Costello ◽  
Kun Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Musculoskeletal Pain ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescribing

scholarly journals Emergency Department Opioid Prescribing Practices for Chronic Pain: a 3-Year Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria J. Ganem ◽  
Alejandra G. Mora ◽  
Shawn M. Varney ◽  
Vikhyat S. Bebarta
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescribing

scholarly journals MP15: Predictors of emergency department opioid use and variability of prescribing practices in a large multicenter Canadian cohort

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S47-S48
Author(s):  
T. Lau ◽  
J. Hayward ◽  
G. Innes
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Pain Treatment ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Opioid Administration ◽  
Unit Increase

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) opioid prescribing has been linked to long-term use and dependence. Anecdotally, significant opioid practice variability exists between physicians and institutions, but this is poorly defined. Our objective was to collate and analyze multicenter data looking at predictors of ED opioid use and to identify potential areas for opioid stewardship. Methods: We linked administrative and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) data from all four ED's within our municipality over a one-year period. Eligible patients included those with a Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) pain complaint or an arrival numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score of greater than 3/10. Patients with missing demographic or chief complaint data were excluded. Multiple imputation was used for missing NRS pain scores. We performed descriptive analyses of opioid-treated and non-treated patients, followed by a multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of ED opioid administration. Results: A total of 129,547 patients were studied. The mean age was 47.4 years and 55.4% were female. The median pain score was 6.6 in the no-opioid group and 8 in the opioid group. The most common pain categories were abdominal pain (23%), trauma (18.2%) and chest pain (15.3%). Overall, opioids were prescribed to 34% of patients. The most common CTAS score was CTAS 3 (44%), CTAS 1-2 42%) and CTAS 4-5 (13.9%). Multivariable predictors of opioid-use included the need for admission (adjusted OR 6.57; CI = 6.34-6.79), NRS pain score (aOR 1.24 per unit increase, CI 1.23-1.25), higher numerical CTAS score (aOR 0.89 per unit increase, CI 0.87-0.91), and chief complaints of back (aOR 7.69, CI 7.1-8.1), abdominal (aOR 5.9, CI 5.6-6.2), and flank pain (OR 3.8, CI 3.5-4). Oral opioids were prescribed in 39.8% of back pain presentations and 18.5% received IV opioids. Increasing age was a predictor but sex was not. There were significant institutional differences in opioid prescribing rates, with Hospital B being the least likely to prescribe opioids (aOR 0.82, CI 0.80-0.85) followed by Hospital C (aOR 0.83, CI 0.79-0.86) compared to the reference standard of Hospital A. Hospital D was most likely to prescribe opioids (aOR 1.32, CI 1.27-1.37). Conclusion: Predictors of ED opioid use were characterized using multicenter administrative data. Future research should seek to describe the physician- and site-level factors driving regional variation in opioid-based pain treatment.

Opioid prescribing practices in academic otolaryngology: A single institutional survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 103038
Author(s):  
Tara E. Mokhtari ◽  
Lauren E. Miller ◽  
Jenny X. Chen ◽  
Christopher J. Hartnick ◽  
Mark A. Varvares
Keyword(s):  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescribing

Opioid prescribing practices of members of the national dental practice based research network

2015 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. e145
Author(s):  
Jenna L. McCauley ◽  
Valeria V. Gordan ◽  
Joseph L. Riley ◽  
Roger B. Fillingim ◽  
Sonia K. Makhija ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Network ◽  
Dental Practice ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Practice Based Research

The Effects of the Opioid Epidemic on Prescribing Practices in Long-Term Care Residents

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-267
Author(s):  
Lisa Yamagishi ◽  
Olivia Erickson ◽  
Kelly Mazzei ◽  
Christine O'Neil ◽  
Khalid M. Kamal
Keyword(s):  
Severe Pain ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
The United States ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Opioid Prescribing

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate opioid prescribing practices for older adults since the opioid crisis in the United States.<br/> DESIGN: Interrupted time-series analysis on retrospective observational cohort study.<br/> SETTING: 176-bed skilled-nursing facility (SNF).<br/> PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to a long-term care facility with pain-related diagnoses between October 1, 2015, and March 31, 2017, were included. Residents discharged prior to 14 days were excluded. Of 392 residents, 258 met inclusion criteria with 313 admissions.<br/> MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Changes in opioid prescribing frequency between two periods: Q1 to Q3 (Spring 2016) and Q4 to Q6 for pre- and postgovernment countermeasure, respectively.<br/> RESULTS: Opioid prescriptions for patients with pain-related diagnoses decreased during period one at -0.10% per quarter (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.85-0.85; P = 0.99), with the rate of decline increasing at -3.8% per quarter from period 1 and 2 (95% CI -0.23-0.15; P = 0.64). Opioid prescribing from top International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision category, "Injury and Poisoning" decreased in prescribing frequency by -3.0% per quarter from Q1 to Q6 (95% CI -0.16-0.10; P = 0.54). Appropriateness of pain-control was obtained from the Minimum Data Set version 3.0 "Percent of Residents Who Self-Report Moderate to Severe Pain (Short Stay)" measure; these results showed a significant increase in inadequacy of pain relief by 0.28% per quarter (95% CI 0.12-0.44; P = 0.009).<br/> CONCLUSION: Residents who self-report moderate- to severe pain have significantly increased since October 2015. Opioid prescriptions may have decreased for elderly patients in SNFs since Spring 2016. Further investigation with a larger population and wider time frame is warranted to further evaluate significance.

Impact of Legislation on Opioid Prescribing following Hysterectomy and Hysteroscopy in Arizona and Florida

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Aakriti R. Carrubba ◽  
Amy E. Glasgow ◽  
Elizabeth B. Habermann ◽  
Amanda P. Stanton ◽  
Megan N. Wasson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Interrupted Time Series ◽  
Interrupted Time Series Analysis ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Legislative Changes

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> This study aimed to determine the oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) prescribed and refill rates following hysterectomy and hysteroscopy in the setting of opioid prescribing practice changes in 2 states. <b><i>Design:</i></b> This is a retrospective cohort analysis consisting of 2,916 patients undergoing hysterectomy or hysteroscopy between July 2016 and September 2019 at 2 affiliated academic hospitals in states that underwent legislative changes in opioid prescribing in 2018. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Participants were identified using the Current Procedural Terminology procedure codes in Arizona and Florida. Hysterectomy was chosen as the most invasive gynecologic procedure, while hysteroscopy was chosen as the least invasive. Medical records were abstracted to find opioid prescriptions from 90 days before surgery to 30 days after discharge. Patients with opioid use between 90 and 7 days before surgery were excluded. Prescriptions were converted to OMEs and were calculated per quarter year. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon rank sum <i>t</i> tests for OMEs and χ<sup>2</sup> <i>t</i> tests for refill rates. Interrupted time-series analysis was used to determine significant change in OMEs before and after legislative change. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). <b><i>Results:</i></b> In Arizona, 1,067 hysterectomies were performed; 459 (43%) vaginal, 561 (52.6%) laparoscopic/robotic, and 47 (4.4%) abdominal. There were 530 hysteroscopies. Overall median OMEs decreased from 225 prior to July 2018 to 75 after July 2018 (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). The opioid refill rate remained unchanged at 7.4% (<i>p</i> = 0.966). In Florida, there were 769 hysterectomies; 241 (31.3%) vaginal, 476 (61.9%) laparoscopic/robotic, and 52 (6.8%) abdominal. There were 549 hysteroscopies. Overall median OMEs decreased from 150 prior to July 2018 to 0 after July 2018 (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). The opioid refill rate was similar (7.8% before July 2018 and 7.3% after July 2018; <i>p</i> = 0.739). <b><i>Limitations:</i></b> Limitations include involvement of a single hospital institution with a total of 10 fellowship-trained surgeons and biases inherent to retrospective study design. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Legislative and provider-led changes coincided with decreases in opioid prescribing after 2018 in both states without increasing rates of refills and showed actual data reflected in the medical record. Gynecologists must actively participate in safe prescribing practices to decrease opioid dependence and misuse.

Understanding Opioid Prescribing Practices of Resident Physicians

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110604
Author(s):  
Julia M. Coughlin ◽  
Samantha L. Terranella ◽  
Ethan M. Ritz ◽  
Thomas Q. Xu ◽  
John F. Tierney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Monitoring Program ◽  
Resident Training ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Resident Physicians ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Patient’S History ◽  
Safe Opioid Prescribing

Background To compare opioid prescribing practices of resident physicians across a variety of surgical and nonsurgical specialties; to identify factors which influence prescribing practices; and to examine resident utilization of best practice supplemental resources. Methods An anonymous survey which assessed prescribing practices was completed by residents from one of several different subspecialties, including internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and urology. Fisher’s exact test assessed differences in prescribing practices between specialties. Results Only 35% of residents reported receiving formal training in safe opioid prescribing. Overall, the most frequently reported influences on prescribing practices were the use of standardized order sets for specific procedures, attending preference, and patient’s history of prescribed opioids. Resident physicians significantly underutilize best practice supplemental resources, such as counseling patients on pain expectations prior to prescribing opioid medication; contacting established pain specialists; screening patients for opioid abuse; referring to the Prescription Monitoring Program; and counseling patients on safe disposal of unused pills ( P < .001). Discussion The incorporation of comprehensive prescribing education into resident training and the utilization of standardized order sets can promote safe opioid prescribing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document