Protein disorder—a breakthrough invention of evolution?

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 412-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avner Schlessinger ◽  
Christian Schaefer ◽  
Esmeralda Vicedo ◽  
Markus Schmidberger ◽  
Marco Punta ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e75057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Mahani ◽  
Johan Henriksson ◽  
Anthony P. H. Wright

Structure ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1453-1459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rune Linding ◽  
Lars Juhl Jensen ◽  
Francesca Diella ◽  
Peer Bork ◽  
Toby J Gibson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (W1) ◽  
pp. W329-W337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bálint Mészáros ◽  
Gábor Erdős ◽  
Zsuzsanna Dosztányi

2018 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 342-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denson Smith ◽  
Sumanth Yenduri ◽  
Sumaiya Iqbal ◽  
P. Venkata Krishna

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (33) ◽  
pp. 23207-23214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupaul Baruah ◽  
Parbati Biswas

Protein disorder, like protein folding, satisfies the principle of minimal frustration.


2010 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Rauscher ◽  
Régis Pomès

Protein disorder is abundant in proteomes throughout all kingdoms of life and serves many biologically important roles. Disordered states of proteins are challenging to study experimentally due to their structural heterogeneity and tendency to aggregate. Computer simulations, which are not impeded by these properties, have recently emerged as a useful tool to characterize the conformational ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins. In this review, we provide a survey of computational studies of protein disorder with an emphasis on the interdisciplinary nature of these studies. The application of simulation techniques to the study of disordered states is described in the context of experimental and bioinformatics approaches. Experimental data can be incorporated into simulations, and simulations can provide predictions for experiment. In this way, simulations have been integrated into the existing methodologies for the study of disordered state ensembles. We provide recent examples of simulations of disordered states from the literature and our own work. Throughout the review, we emphasize important predictions and biophysical understanding made possible through the use of simulations. This review is intended as both an overview and a guide for structural biologists and theoretical biophysicists seeking accurate, atomic-level descriptions of disordered state ensembles.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 5814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Santos ◽  
Valentín Iglesias ◽  
Carlos Pintado ◽  
Juan Santos-Suárez ◽  
Salvador Ventura

The natively unfolded nature of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) relies on several physicochemical principles, of which the balance between a low sequence hydrophobicity and a high net charge appears to be critical. Under this premise, it is well-known that disordered proteins populate a defined region of the charge–hydropathy (C–H) space and that a linear boundary condition is sufficient to distinguish between folded and disordered proteins, an approach widely applied for the prediction of protein disorder. Nevertheless, it is evident that the C–H relation of a protein is not unalterable but can be modulated by factors extrinsic to its sequence. Here, we applied a C–H-based analysis to develop a computational approach that evaluates sequence disorder as a function of pH, assuming that both protein net charge and hydrophobicity are dependent on pH solution. On that basis, we developed DispHred, the first pH-dependent predictor of protein disorder. Despite its simplicity, DispHred displays very high accuracy in identifying pH-induced order/disorder protein transitions. DispHred might be useful for diverse applications, from the analysis of conditionally disordered segments to the synthetic design of disorder tags for biotechnological applications. Importantly, since many disorder predictors use hydrophobicity as an input, the here developed framework can be implemented in other state-of-the-art algorithms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document