Discovery of allosteric binding sites by crystallographic fragment screening

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 209-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Krojer ◽  
James S Fraser ◽  
Frank von Delft
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Olp ◽  
Daniel Sprague ◽  
Stefan Kathman ◽  
Ziyang Xu ◽  
Alexandar Statsyuk ◽  
...  

<p>Brd4, a member of the bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) family, has emerged as a promising epigenetic target in cancer and inflammatory disorders. All reported BET family ligands bind within the bromodomain acetyl-lysine binding sites and competitively inhibit BET protein interaction with acetylated chromatin. Alternative chemical probes that act orthogonally to the highly-conserved acetyl-lysine binding sites may exhibit selectivity within the BET family and avoid recently reported toxicity in clinical trials of BET bromodomain inhibitors. Here, we report the first identification of a ligandable site on a bromodomain outside the acetyl-lysine binding site. Inspired by our computational prediction of hotspots adjacent to non-homologous cysteine residues within the <i>C</i>-terminal Brd4 bromodomain (Brd4-BD2), we performed a mid-throughput mass spectrometry screen to identify cysteine-reactive fragments that covalently and selectively modify Brd4. Subsequent mass spectrometry, NMR and computational docking analyses of electrophilic fragment hits revealed a novel ligandable site near Cys356 that is unique to Brd4 among all human bromodomains. This site is orthogonal to the Brd4-BD2 acetyl-lysine binding site as Cys356 modification did not impact binding of the pan-BET bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 in fluorescence polarization assays. Finally, we tethered covalent fragments to JQ1 and performed NanoBRET assays to provide proof of principle that this orthogonal site can be covalently targeted in intact human cells. Overall, we demonstrate the potential of targeting sites orthogonal to bromodomain acetyl-lysine binding sites to develop bivalent and covalent inhibitors that displace Brd4 from chromatin.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 666-679
Author(s):  
Jiayin Diao ◽  
Aaron DeBono ◽  
Tracy M. Josephs ◽  
Jane E. Bourke ◽  
Ben Capuano ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 843-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C.-H. Lin ◽  
Qi Guo ◽  
Jian Luo ◽  
Jane Zhang ◽  
Kathy Nguyen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (52) ◽  
pp. 15910-15915 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Frederick Ludlow ◽  
Marcel L. Verdonk ◽  
Harpreet K. Saini ◽  
Ian J. Tickle ◽  
Harren Jhoti

Proteins need to be tightly regulated as they control biological processes in most normal cellular functions. The precise mechanisms of regulation are rarely completely understood but can involve binding of endogenous ligands and/or partner proteins at specific locations on a protein that can modulate function. Often, these additional secondary binding sites appear separate to the primary binding site, which, for example for an enzyme, may bind a substrate. In previous work, we have uncovered several examples in which secondary binding sites were discovered on proteins using fragment screening approaches. In each case, we were able to establish that the newly identified secondary binding site was biologically relevant as it was able to modulate function by the binding of a small molecule. In this study, we investigate how often secondary binding sites are located on proteins by analyzing 24 protein targets for which we have performed a fragment screen using X-ray crystallography. Our analysis shows that, surprisingly, the majority of proteins contain secondary binding sites based on their ability to bind fragments. Furthermore, sequence analysis of these previously unknown sites indicate high conservation, which suggests that they may have a biological function, perhaps via an allosteric mechanism. Comparing the physicochemical properties of the secondary sites with known primary ligand binding sites also shows broad similarities indicating that many of the secondary sites may be druggable in nature with small molecules that could provide new opportunities to modulate potential therapeutic targets.


2014 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Schober ◽  
Carrie H. Croy ◽  
Hongling Xiao ◽  
Arthur Christopoulos ◽  
Christian C. Felder

2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 471-472
Author(s):  
Paulina Chorobik ◽  
Piotr Brański ◽  
Grzegorz Burnat ◽  
Barbara Chruścicka ◽  
Tomasz Lenda ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Wu ◽  
Liskin Swint-Kruse ◽  
Aron W. Fenton

AbstractFor protein mutagenesis, a common expectation is that important positions will behave like on/off “toggle” switches (i.e., a few substitutions act like wildtype, most abolish function). However, there exists another class of important positions that manifests a wide range of functional outcomes upon substitution: “rheostat” positions. Previously, we evaluated rheostat positions located near the allosteric binding sites for inhibitor alanine (Ala) and activator fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (Fru-1,6-BP) in human liver pyruvate kinase. When substituted with multiple amino acids, many positions demonstrated moderate rheostatic effects on allosteric coupling between effector binding and phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) binding in the active site. Nonetheless, the combined outcomes of all positions sampled the full range of possible allosteric coupling (full tunability). However, that study only evaluated allosteric tunability of “local” positions, i.e., positions were located near the binding sites of the allosteric ligand being assessed. Here, we evaluated tunability of allosteric coupling when mutated sites were distant from the allosterically-coupled binding sites. Positions near the Ala binding site had rheostatic outcomes on allosteric coupling between Fru-1,6-BP and PEP binding. In contrast, positions in the Fru-1,6-BP site exhibited modest effects on coupling between Ala and PEP binding. Analyzed in aggregate, both PEP/Ala and PEP/Fru-1,6-BP coupling were again fully tunable by amino acid substitutions at this limited set of distant positions. Furthermore, some positions exhibited rheostatic control over multiple parameters and others exhibited rheostatic effects on one parameter and toggle control over a second. These findings highlight challenges in efforts to both predict/interpret mutational outcomes and engineer functions into proteins.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document