Sleep and psychotic symptoms: An actigraphy and diary study with young adults with low and elevated psychosis proneness

2020 ◽  
Vol 221 ◽  
pp. 12-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Hennig ◽  
Björn Schlier ◽  
Tania M. Lincoln
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Granville James Matheson ◽  
Pontus Plavén-Sigray ◽  
Anaïs Louzolo ◽  
Jacqueline Borg ◽  
Lars Farde ◽  
...  

AbstractThe dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) is thought to play a role in psychosis and schizophrenia, however the exact nature of this involvement is not clear. Positron emission tomography studies comparing D1R between patients and control subjects have produced inconsistent results. An important confounding factor in most clinical studies is previous exposure to antipsychotic treatment, which is thought to influence the density of D1R. To circumvent some of the limitations of clinical studies, an alternative approach for studying the relationship between D1R and psychosis is to examine individuals at increased risk for psychotic disorders, or variation in subclinical psychotic symptoms such as delusional ideation within the general population, referred to as psychosis proneness traits. In this study, we investigated whether D1R availability is associated with delusional ideation in healthy controls using data from 76 individuals measured with PET using [11C]SCH23390 and 217 individuals who completed delusional ideation questionnaires, belonging to three different study cohorts. We first performed exploratory, hypothesis-generating, analyses by creating and evaluating a new measure of delusional ideation (n=132 and n=27), which was then found to show a negative association with D1R availability (n=24). Next, we performed confirmatory analyses using Bayesian statistical modelling, in which we first attempted to replicate this result (n=20), and then evaluated the association of Peters Delusion Inventory scores with D1R availability in two independent cohorts (n=41 and 20). Collectively, we found strong evidence that there is little to no linear association between delusional ideation and D1R availability in healthy controls. If differences in D1R can be confirmed in drug-naive schizophrenia patients compared to controls, further studies are needed to ascertain whether these changes occur at the onset of psychotic symptoms or if they are associated with specific behavioural or genetic aspects of psychosis proneness other than delusional ideation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 323-335
Author(s):  
Åsa-Sara Sernheim ◽  
Helena Hemmingsson ◽  
Helene Lidström ◽  
I. Witt Engerström ◽  
G. M. Liedberg

2006 ◽  
Vol 188 (6) ◽  
pp. 527-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janneke Spauwen ◽  
Lydia Krabbendam ◽  
Roselind Lieb ◽  
Hans-Ulrich Wittchen ◽  
Jim Van Os

BackgroundThe reported link between psychological trauma and onset of psychosis remains controversial.AimsTo examine associations between self-reported psychological trauma and psychotic symptoms as a function of prior evidence of vulnerability to psychosis (psychosis proneness).MethodAt baseline, 2524 adolescents aged 14–24 years provided self-reports on psychological trauma and psychosis proneness, and at follow-up (on average 42 months later) participants were interviewed for presence of psychotic symptoms.ResultsSelf-reported trauma was associated with psychotic symptoms, in particular at more severe levels (adjusted OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.16–3.08) and following trauma associated with intense fear, helplessness or horror. The risk difference between those with and without self-reported trauma at baseline was 7% in the group with baseline psychosis proneness, but only 1.8% in those without (adjusted test for difference between these two effect sizes: χ2=4.6, P=0.032).ConclusionsExposure to psychological trauma may increase the risk of psychotic symptoms in people vulnerable to psychosis.


2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (43) ◽  
pp. 13401-13406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Teufel ◽  
Naresh Subramaniam ◽  
Veronika Dobler ◽  
Jesus Perez ◽  
Johanna Finnemann ◽  
...  

Many neuropsychiatric illnesses are associated with psychosis, i.e., hallucinations (perceptions in the absence of causative stimuli) and delusions (irrational, often bizarre beliefs). Current models of brain function view perception as a combination of two distinct sources of information: bottom-up sensory input and top-down influences from prior knowledge. This framework may explain hallucinations and delusions. Here, we characterized the balance between visual bottom-up and top-down processing in people with early psychosis (study 1) and in psychosis-prone, healthy individuals (study 2) to elucidate the mechanisms that might contribute to the emergence of psychotic experiences. Through a specialized mental-health service, we identified unmedicated individuals who experience early psychotic symptoms but fall below the threshold for a categorical diagnosis. We observed that, in early psychosis, there was a shift in information processing favoring prior knowledge over incoming sensory evidence. In the complementary study, we capitalized on subtle variations in perception and belief in the general population that exhibit graded similarity with psychotic experiences (schizotypy). We observed that the degree of psychosis proneness in healthy individuals, and, specifically, the presence of subtle perceptual alterations, is also associated with stronger reliance on prior knowledge. Although, in the current experimental studies, this shift conferred a performance benefit, under most natural viewing situations, it may provoke anomalous perceptual experiences. Overall, we show that early psychosis and psychosis proneness both entail a basic shift in visual information processing, favoring prior knowledge over incoming sensory evidence. The studies provide complementary insights to a mechanism by which psychotic symptoms may emerge.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Wansink ◽  
Audrey Wansink

Can visual plate-related dietary guidance systems -- such as the MyPlate guideline or the Half-Plate Rule -- help people eat better when dining at home or in restaurants? To help explore this, 104 young adults completed a food diary study after having been randomly assigned to follow either 1) USDA MyPlate guidelines, 2) the Half-Plate Rule, or 3) no guidelines (control condition). Both of the visual dietary guidance systems were considered easy to understand, to follow, and left people with fewer questions about what to eat (all p<.01). Moreover, people who rated a system "easy to follow" indicated they had consumed less (meat (r = .268), but this was uncorrelated with fruit and vegetable intake (r =.092) and carbohydrate intake (r = .069). There are three key conclusions to these and other findings: First, the simplest guidance system may be more effective than no system. Second, even the most perfect dietary guidance system will not change behavior if the foods are not available or it is not followed. Third, guidance systems could over-increase the consumption of any food they specifically mention.


Author(s):  
Raquel E. Gur

Attenuated psychotic symptoms characterize the prodromal phase of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Becausemany help-seeking individuals who manifest such symptoms do not transition to psychosis, the incorporation of brain behavior measures that canidentify psychosis proneness may help understand potentially contributing neurobiological mechanisms. Neurobehavioral studiesin clinical risk groups show diffuse deficits across multiple domains.The pattern is similar, but less severe, than that observed in schizophrenia. Neuroimaging studies of brain structure, connectivity and activation, also indicate abnormalities in a pattern similar to that evident in schizophrenia. Limited longitudinal studies suggest that transition to psychosis is associated with greater aberrations of neurobehavioral and neuroimaging measures. These findings pave the way to developing models that can predict progression and offer avenues for interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document