Development And External Validation Of A Predictive Nomogram Model Of Posttraumatic Epilepsy: A Retrospective Analysis

Seizure ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue-ping Wang ◽  
Jie Zhong ◽  
Ting Lei ◽  
Hai-jiao Wang ◽  
Li-na Zhu ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e045052
Author(s):  
Ana Belen Serrano ◽  
Maria Gomez-Rojo ◽  
Eva Ureta ◽  
Monica Nuñez ◽  
Borja Fernández Félix ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo determine preoperative factors associated to myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) and to develop a prediction model of MINS.DesignRetrospective analysis.SettingTertiary hospital in Spain.ParticipantsPatients aged ≥45 years undergoing major non-cardiac surgery and with at least two measures of troponin levels within the first 3 days of the postoperative period. All patients were screened for the MANAGE trial.Primary and secondary outcome measuresWe used multivariable logistic regression analysis to study risk factors associated with MINS and created a score predicting the preoperative risk for MINS and a nomogram to facilitate bed-side use. We used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator method to choose the factors included in the predictive model with MINS as dependent variable. The predictive ability of the model was evaluated. Discrimination was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration was visually assessed using calibration plots representing deciles of predicted probability of MINS against the observed rate in each risk group and the calibration-in-the-large (CITL) and the calibration slope. We created a nomogram to facilitate obtaining risk estimates for patients at pre-anaesthesia evaluation.ResultsOur cohort included 3633 patients recruited from 9 September 2014 to 17 July 2017. The incidence of MINS was 9%. Preoperative risk factors that increased the risk of MINS were age, American Status Anaesthesiology classification and vascular surgery. The predictive model showed good performance in terms of discrimination (AUC=0.720; 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.75) and calibration slope=1.043 (95% CI: 0.90 to 1.18) and CITL=0.00 (95% CI: −0.12 to 0.12).ConclusionsOur predictive model based on routinely preoperative information is highly affordable and might be a useful tool to identify moderate-high risk patients before surgery. However, external validation is needed before implementation.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e0119671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bang Wool Eom ◽  
Keun Won Ryu ◽  
Byung-Ho Nam ◽  
Yunjin Park ◽  
Hyuk-Joon Lee ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Julie L. Wambaugh ◽  
Lydia Kallhoff ◽  
Christina Nessler

Purpose This study was designed to examine the association of dosage and effects of Sound Production Treatment (SPT) for acquired apraxia of speech. Method Treatment logs and probe data from 20 speakers with apraxia of speech and aphasia were submitted to a retrospective analysis. The number of treatment sessions and teaching episodes was examined relative to (a) change in articulation accuracy above baseline performance, (b) mastery of production, and (c) maintenance. The impact of practice schedule (SPT-Blocked vs. SPT-Random) was also examined. Results The average number of treatment sessions conducted prior to change was 5.4 for SPT-Blocked and 3.9 for SPT-Random. The mean number of teaching episodes preceding change was 334 for SPT-Blocked and 179 for SPT-Random. Mastery occurred within an average of 13.7 sessions (1,252 teaching episodes) and 12.4 sessions (1,082 teaching episodes) for SPT-Blocked and SPT-Random, respectively. Comparisons of dosage metric values across practice schedules did not reveal substantial differences. Significant negative correlations were found between follow-up probe performance and the dosage metrics. Conclusions Only a few treatment sessions were needed to achieve initial positive changes in articulation, with mastery occurring within 12–14 sessions for the majority of participants. Earlier occurrence of change or mastery was associated with better follow-up performance. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12592190


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 427-427
Author(s):  
Sijo J. Parekattil ◽  
Udaya Kumar ◽  
Nicholas J. Hegarty ◽  
Clay Williams ◽  
Tara Allen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Laura Gray ◽  
Yogini Chudasama ◽  
Alison Dunkley ◽  
Freya Tyrer ◽  
Rebecca Spong ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 145-146
Author(s):  
Tiffany Schwasinger-Schmidt ◽  
Georges Elhomsy ◽  
Fanglong Dong ◽  
Bobbie Paull-Forney

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document