Management of patients with pain and severe side effects while on intrathecal morphine therapy: A case study

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kehua Zhou ◽  
Sen Sheng ◽  
Gary G. Wang

AbstractBackground and aimsThe use of intrathecal morphine therapy has been increasing. Intrathecal morphine therapy is deemed the last resort for patients with intractable chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) who failed other treatments including surgery and pharmaceutical interventions. However, effective treatments for patients with CNCP who “failed” this last resort because of severe side effects and lack of optimal pain control remain unclear.Methods and resultsHere we report two successfully managed patients (Ms. S and Mr. T) who had intractable pain and significant complications years after the start of intrathecal morphine therapy. The two patients had intrathecal morphine pump implantation due to chronic consistent pain and multiple failed surgical operations in the spine. Years after morphine pump implantation, both patients had significant chronic pain and compromised function for activities of daily living. Additionally, Ms. S also had four episodes of small bowel obstruction while Mr. T was diagnosed with end stage severe “dementia”. The successful management of these two patients included the simultaneous multidisciplinary approach for pain management, opioids tapering and discontinuation.ConclusionThe case study indicates that for patients who fail to respond to intrathecal morphine pump therapy due to side effects and lack of optimal pain control, the simultaneous multidisciplinary pain management approach and opioids tapering seem appropriate.

2007 ◽  
Vol 2;10 (3;2) ◽  
pp. 357-365
Author(s):  
Xiulu Ruan

Background: The introduction of intrathecal opioid administration for intractable chronic non-malignant pain and cancer pain is considered as one of the most important breakthroughs in pain management. Morphine, the only opioid approved by FDA for intrathecal administration, has been increasingly utilized for this purpose. For over 3 decades, there have been numerous reports on the non-nociceptive side effects associated with ever increasing long-term intrathecal morphine usage. Objectives: To review the literature on side effects due to long-term intrathecal morphine therapy with discussions of alternate treatment options. Design: English-language publications were identified through MEDLINE search and the bibliographies of identified articles were reviewed. Results: Most side effects of intrathecal morphine therapy are dose dependent and mediated by opioid receptors. Common ones include nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, constipation, sexual dysfunction, and edema. Less common ones include respiratory depression, and hyperalgesia. Catheter tip inflammatory mass formation is a less common complication that may not be mediated by opioid receptors. Conclusion: The utilization of intrathecal morphine administration for cancer and intractable non-malignant chronic pain represents an important leap forward in pain management. Yet, a wide variety of non-nociceptive side effects may also occur in susceptible patients. The side effects due to intrathecal morphine administration are mostly mediated by opioid receptors. Treatment usually involves the utilization of opioid receptor antagonist, such as naloxone. Patients considering intrathecal opioid pump therapy should be informed and advised about the possible side effects associated with longterm intrathecal morphine administration prior to placement of a permanent morphine infusion pump. Key words: side effects, intrathecal morphine, opioid receptors


2019 ◽  
pp. 221-245
Author(s):  
Roxana Grasu ◽  
Sally Raty

This chapter discusses postcraniotomy headache (PCH), a common yet frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated occurrence, with up to 30% of patients experiencing persistent headache after surgery. The chapter identifies risk factors for the development of acute and persistent PCH and describes mechanisms for its development, such as injury to the sensory nerves supplying the scalp and underlying tissues or to the perivascular nerves that supply sensation to the dura mater. Pain management following craniotomy is a balancing act of achieving adequate analgesia while avoiding oversedation, respiratory depression, hypercapnia, nausea, vomiting, and hypertension. Current evidence suggests that a balanced, multimodal approach to the treatment of acute PCH is often required to optimize pain control, minimize undesired side effects, and prevent the development of persistent PCH.


Author(s):  
Eelco F. M. Wijdicks ◽  
Sarah L. Clark

Adequate pain control has a high priority. In any acute neurologic pain syndrome it must be assumed that pain management is possible, effective, and simple; unfortunately, most patients in pain have been poorly managed. The pharmacopeia of pain management is growing and changing and several trends have been noted. Pain is underreported in the intensive care unit and should be treated when indicated. Acetaminophen is often the first agent used in pain management. Next are weak narcotic analgesics which could have less severe side effects than stronger opioid analgesics. This chapter discusses types of pain in the neurosciences intensive care unit and specific pharmacologic approaches.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kehua Zhou, MD, DPT, LAc ◽  
Leslie Frankish, BS ◽  
Gary G. Wang, MD, PhD

Opioid tapering may be necessary for patients on long-term opioids. Here, the authors presented a patient who had uncontrolled chronic musculoskeletal pain while on chronic methadone. Upon methadone tapering, the patient had been taking methadone for longer than six years and had severe methadone-related adverse effects. Using multidisciplinary interventions of patient education and counseling, physical interventions, and nonopioid medications, patient’s methadone was discontinued after longer than one year tapering with relatively good pain control. The tapering process highlights the importance of pain management during opioid tapering using multidisciplinary interventions to prevent and treat opioid withdrawal and pain relapses.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pawinee Pangthipampai ◽  
Sukanya Dejarkom ◽  
Suppachai Poolsuppasit ◽  
Choopong Luansritisakul Luansritisakul ◽  
Suwida Tangchittam

Abstract Background: Achieving optimal abdominal analgesia with few side effects is the goal of pain management after cesarean delivery. Intrathecal morphine is the current standard but ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block (US-QLB) may offer superior pain control with fewer side effects. This study compared the pain-free period after cesarean delivery among parturients who received spinal block with IT morphine 0.2 mg, with IT morphine 0.2 mg and bilateral QLB, or only bilateral QLB.Methods: Parturients having elective cesarean delivery with a low transverse incision under spinal block were randomized to three groups. Subjects were allocated into IT morphine 0.2 mg with sham QLB (Group IT morphine), IT morphine 0.2 mg and bilateral QLB with 0.25% bupivacaine 25 ml and adrenaline 1:250,000 in each side (Group IT morphine with QLB), or bilateral QLB with 0.25% bupivacaine 25 ml and adrenaline 1:250,000 in each side (Group QLB). A PCA pump was connected to each parturient after completion of the QLB or sham block. The first time to PCA morphine requirement when parturients experienced pain was recorded and compared.Results: Eighty parturients were included. Analysis of Group QLB was terminated early because Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed the median pain-free period to be significantly shorter in Group QLB at the second interim analysis; [2.50 hours (95% CI: 1.04-3.96) in Group IT morphine vs. 7.75 (95% CI: 5.67-9.83) in Group IT morphine with QLB vs. 1.75 (95% CI: 0.75-2.75) in Group QLB (overall p<0.001)]. The median (min, max) amount of morphine required during 24 hours was 5.5 (0-25) in Group IT morphine vs. 5.0 (0-36) in Group IT morphine with QLB vs. 17.5 (1-40) mg in Group QLB (p<0.001). In the final analysis the median pain-free period was 2.50 hours (95%CI: 1.23-3.77) in Group IT morphine (n=27) and 8.02 (95%CI: 5.96-10.07) in Group IT morphine with QLB (n=28). (Gehan-Breslow p=0.027).Conclusion: US-QLB used in conjunction with IT morphine yielded a statistically significant longer median pain-free period compared with standard IT morphine alone. However, QLB alone provided inferior pain control compared with standard IT morphine. When combined with IT morphine, QLB may provide additional analgesic benefit as a part of multimodal analgesic regimen, especially during the early postoperative period.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT03199170 Date registered on June 22, 2017. Prospectively registered.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0009
Author(s):  
Chompunoot Pathonsamit ◽  
Pruk Chaiyakit ◽  
Ittiwat Onklin

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is concerned as a severe postoperative pain procedure. Intrathecal morphine provides good analgesia but has many side effects such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus and respiratory depression. Appropriate postoperative pain control strategy with lower side effect is still challenging. We combined periarticular injection(PI) as a multimodal analgesia with intrathecal morphine in order to decrease intrathecal morphine dosage and lower side effects. Objective: To determine side-effect profiles and efficacy of 0.1 mg and 0.2 mg intrathecal morphine combine with PI in primary unilateral TKA. Material and method: In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing TKA were recruited from April 2018 to April 2019. All patients were randomized into 3 groups. M 0 (n=32), M 1 (n=36)and M 2 (n=34) represent no intrathecal morphine, 0.1 mg and 0.2 mg intrathecal morphine respectively. All Group received same regimen of PI as a multimodal analgesia and same postoperative pain control protocol. Results: Patients in group M 2 had more nausea or vomiting side effects compared to group M 1 in early postoperative 4 hours(77.1% and 51.4%) with statistical significant(p<0.05) and also required 2 antiemetic drug to relieve symptoms (4.7% and 2.3%) with statistical significant ( p<0.05). No difference in postoperative pain score, rescue analgesic drug consumption ,pruritic score, sedation score, respiratory depression and orthopedic outcomes such as straight leg rising time and maximum active knee flexion between M 1 and M 2 groups. Conclusion: Lower intrathecal morphine dosage (0.1 mg) combine with periarticular injection in primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty provide similar postoperative pain control as standard intrathecal morphine dosage(0.2 mg) combine with periarticular injection with lower rates and severities of nausea and vomiting in first postoperative 4 hours.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1062-1062
Author(s):  
Gladstone C McDowell ◽  
Jerry Mitchell ◽  
Timothy D. Moore

Abstract Abstract 1062 Many patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) have recurrent, severe vaso-occlusive pain crises, with profound consequences for their quality of life. These pain crises are sometimes responsive to medical management of the underlying disease or to palliative opioid or nonopioid therapies, but in other cases, the pain is intractable. In addition, patients with SCD are prone to chronic, debilitating pain from related conditions. We decided to test intrathecal (IT) ziconotide therapy using an implantable pump with the addition of a Personal Therapy Manager (PTM) patient control accessory in patients with SCD and severe, intractable pain. Ziconotide is a direct and selective inhibitor of N-type calcium channels, believed to reduce signaling in spinal pain pathways. In randomized, controlled trials, ziconotide has been shown to reduce severe chronic pain of various etiologies. We identified 2 patients with SCD and a history of prolonged, intractable pain as suitable candidates. After successful IT ziconotide bolus dose trials demonstrated the utility of ziconotide, these patients were implanted with programmable IT infusion pumps with PTM. Ziconotide was titrated to effect over several weeks. Patient 1 was a 29-year-old female with a history of SCD and hemoglobin of 7, MCV of 83, and platelet count of 297. She had been treated at major academic centers and by private practice hematologists with maximal medical therapy including hydroxyurea and folic acid. She was hospitalized about once a month in the previous 12 months for administration of IV opioids with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Currently she has evidence of aseptic necrosis of both hips, not improved by intra-articular steroid injections; she is not a candidate for joint replacements in view of her youth. She underwent a 1-mcg fluoroscopically directed IT bolus trial of ziconotide, with a reduction in her average visual analog scale (VAS) pain score of 9/10 to 0/10 for 48 hours, which was an unusual occurrence for her. She was able to sleep without difficulty and had improvement in her bilateral lower extremity, hip, rib, and back pain. A pump was then implanted for continuous IT infusion of ziconotide. She has not required emergency room visits or hospitalization for sickle cell crises since pump implantation. She is currently at 3.75 mcg/d of ziconotide with a PTM dose of 0.350 mcg every 3 hours and is interested in returning to work. She has not experienced any significant adverse events during the ziconotide titration phase. Patient 2 was a 31-year-old female with a history of hemoglobin S and thalassemia trait. She had bilateral avascular necrosis of the shoulders and hips and had been treated with chronic opioid therapy (fentanyl 50 mcg) but was still being hospitalized monthly for pain management. She had been treated at 2 major academic institutions as well as multiple community hospitals. The patient admitted to previous use of marijuana and cocaine in an effort to control her pain, as well as to obtaining pain medications from multiple physicians. She responded to a 7-mcg IT ziconotide trial with pain reduction from 8/10 to 0/10 for several days and then underwent implantation of a programmable pump with PTM. Following pump implantation she had satisfactory analgesia and did not require any emergency room visits for pain at a stable ziconotide dose of 1.5 mcg/d with a PTM dose of 0.150 mcg every 3 hours. This patient was receiving home refills and developed a pump pocket infection, requiring explantation of her IT infusion pump. Currently, she is poorly controlled on long-acting opioids and has requested reimplantation of her pump with ziconotide monotherapy. Here we describe 2 cases of successful pain management in SCD with IT ziconotide. While receiving continuous IT infusion of ziconotide, both patients were able to be titrated off of high-dose, long-acting opioids. In addition, the PTM proved useful for dosage finding during the titration phase as well as for aborting pain flares. We are in the process of studying a larger number of patients to better define the improvements achieved in functional status, analgesia, and healthcare savings with improved pain management using ziconotide in patients with SCD. Disclosures: McDowell: Azur Pharma: Speakers Bureau.


Neurosurgery ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 801-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Nurchi

Abstract The use of the intraventricular or subarachnoid administration of morphine in the treatment of intractable pain secondary to cancer is described. The drug, in doses ranging from 0.33 to 4.00 mg, was administered by the percutaneous injection of an Ommaya reservoir or by a spinal tap. The duration of analgesia ranged from 36 to 150 hours. The indications for and side effects of this type of therapy are considered.


1982 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milam E. Leavens ◽  
C. Stratton Hill ◽  
David A. Cech ◽  
Jane B. Weyland ◽  
Jaye S. Weston

✓ Intractable pain in six cancer patients was treated with lumbar intrathecal morphine (two patients) and intraventricular morphine (four patients). Daily percutaneous injections of morphine through Ommaya reservoirs were made. Initially, 1 mg of lumbar intrathecal morphine resulted in pain relief for 10 to 14 hours, and 2.5 to 4.0 mg of intraventricular morphine gave relief for 12 to 24 hours. This treatment was continued for 3 to 7 months in three of the adults. Morphine requirements gradually increased. Side effects were minimal, and there were no complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document