scholarly journals Shadow-band radiometer measurement of diffuse solar irradiance: Calculation of geometrical and total correction factors

Solar Energy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 85-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel de Simón-Martín ◽  
Montserrat Díez-Mediavilla ◽  
Cristina Alonso-Tristán
1967 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1200-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. DRUMMOND ◽  
J. R. HICKEY ◽  
W. J. SCHOLES ◽  
E. G. LAUE

1967 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. DRUMMOND ◽  
J. HICKEY ◽  
E. LAUE ◽  
W. SCHOLES

2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 997-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
José A. Martínez-Lozano ◽  
Maria P. Utrillas ◽  
Roberto Pedrós ◽  
Fernando Tena ◽  
Juan P. Díaz ◽  
...  

Abstract This paper presents the results of the analysis of the spectral, global, and direct solar irradiance measurements in the visible range (400–700 nm) that were made in the framework of the first Iberian UV–visible (VIS) instruments intercomparison. The instruments used in this spectral range were four spectroradiometers: three Licor 1800s equipped with different receiver optics and one Optronic 754. For the direct solar irradiance measurements the spectroradiometers were equipped with collimators with different fields of view. Parallel studies have been carried out with the data given by the spectroradiometers with their original calibration file and with the same data that is corrected, following in situ calibration of the instruments using a laboratory reference lamp. To compare the series of spectral data the relative values of mean absolute deviation (MAD) and root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) have been used. The results obtained from the measurements of global irradiance show that the Licor 1800s presented very significant differences at the beginning and at the end of the day due to the deviation from ideal cosine response of the collection optics (i.e., cosine errors). This forced the analysis to be limited to the measurements corresponding to solar elevations higher than 30°. For this solar elevation range, the results of the intercomparison between the Licor instruments, before their in situ calibration, showed differences of about 5% in the visible range. The results from the measurements of direct irradiance show that, if correction factors are considered, these deviations are reduced to 3%, and when the Licors are compared with the Optronic, the deviations are less than 2%.


2016 ◽  
Vol 136 (12) ◽  
pp. 898-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joao Gari da Silva Fonseca Junior ◽  
Hideaki Ohtake ◽  
Takashi Oozeki ◽  
Kazuhiko Ogimoto

1978 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Anderson ◽  
R. L. Wilham

Author(s):  
Наум Аронович Эпштейн

Представлены формулы для расчета коэффициентов относительной чувствительности RRF (relative response factors) и поправочных коэффициентов F (correction factors) примесей, а также формулы, необходимые для понимания сущности коэффициентов RRF и F. Рассмотрены основные способы определения поправочных коэффициентов и их ограничения (условия, выполнение которых необходимо для корректного определения RRF и F). Эти ограничения не отражены в Европейской фармакопее и в Фармакопее США, но от их учета зависит правильность определения значений поправочных коэффициентов. Приведены примеры и даны рекомендации для надежного определения и правильного использования поправочных коэффициентов.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document