scholarly journals Modeling spatio-temporal complex covariance functions for vectorial data

2022 ◽  
pp. 100562
Author(s):  
C. Cappello ◽  
S. De Iaco ◽  
S. Maggio ◽  
D. Posa
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina Maggio ◽  
Donato Posa ◽  
Sandra De Iaco ◽  
Claudia Cappello

<p><span><span>Oceanographic data belong to the wide class of vectorial data, for which the decomposition in modulus and direction is meaningful, and the vectorial components are characterized by homogeneous quantities, with the same unit of measurement. Another feature of oceanographic data is that they exhibit spatio-temporal dependence.<br>In Geostatistics, such data can be properly modelled by recalling the theory of complex-valued random fields. However, in the literature, only techniques for modeling and predicting the spatial evolution of these phenomena were proposed; while the temporal dependence was analyzed separately from the spatial one, or just time-varying complex covariance models were used. Thus, the novelty of this paper regards some advances of the complex formalism for analyzing complex data in space-time and new classes of spatio-temporal complex covariance models.<br>A case study on spatio-temporal complex estimating and modeling with oceanographic data is provided and a comparison between two classes of complex covariance models is also proposed.</span></span></p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Morris

<p><b>Spatial and spatio-temporal phenomena are commonly modelled as Gaussian processes via the geostatistical model (Gelfand & Banerjee, 2017). In the geostatistical model the spatial dependence structure is modelled using covariance functions. Most commonly, the covariance functions impose an assumption of spatial stationarity on the process. That means the covariance between observations at particular locations depends only on the distance between the locations (Banerjee et al., 2014). It has been widely recognized that most, if not all, processes manifest spatially nonstationary covariance structure Sampson (2014). If the study domain is small in area or there is not enough data to justify more complicated nonstationary approaches, then stationarity may be assumed for the sake of mathematical convenience (Fouedjio, 2017). However, relationships between variables can vary significantly over space, and a ‘global’ estimate of the relationships may obscure interesting geographical phenomena (Brunsdon et al., 1996; Fouedjio, 2017; Sampson & Guttorp, 1992). </b></p> <p>In this thesis, we considered three non-parametric approaches to flexibly account for non-stationarity in both spatial and spatio-temporal processes. First, we proposed partitioning the spatial domain into sub-regions using the K-means clustering algorithm based on a set of appropriate geographic features. This allowed for fitting separate stationary covariance functions to the smaller sub-regions to account for local differences in covariance across the study region. Secondly, we extended the concept of covariance network regression to model the covariance matrix of both spatial and spatio-temporal processes. The resulting covariance estimates were found to be more flexible in accounting for spatial autocorrelation than standard stationary approaches. The third approach involved geographic random forest methodology using a neighbourhood structure for each location constructed through clustering. We found that clustering based on geographic measures such as longitude and latitude ensured that observations that were too far away to have any influence on the observations near the locations where a local random forest was fitted were not selected to form the neighbourhood. </p> <p>In addition to developing flexible methods to account for non-stationarity, we developed a pivotal discrepancy measure approach for goodness-of-fit testing of spatio-temporal geostatistical models. We found that partitioning the pivotal discrepancy measures increased the power of the test.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alisa Yakhontova ◽  
Roelof Rietbroek ◽  
Sophie Stolzenberger ◽  
Nadja Jonas

&lt;p&gt;This study addresses mapping of Argo temperature and salinity profiles onto arbitrary positions using physically advanced statistical information from model fields, and their subsequent parametrization as function of depth. Argo suffers from spatio-temporal sampling problems, and some signals are not well captured, e.g. in the deeper ocean below 2000m, around the boundary currents, in the Arctic or in the shelf/coastal regions which are not frequently visited by floats. Mapping of Argo data into sparsely sampled areas would greatly benefit from additional physical information of coherent T/S behavior in form of covariance functions. Outputs from global general ocean circulation model FESOM1.4 provide covariance information for least squares collocation and also complement the spatially undersampled Argo data in high latitudes and in deep ocean. Additionally, model covariances are used to identify areas of strong correlation with interpolation points, so that only Argo measurements inside these areas are included in the mapping procedure. Parametrization of T/S profiles is performed with b-splines where the choice of knot locations is a trade-off between accuracy and overfitting. Proposed methodology is tested in South Atlantic, but can be extended to other regions.&lt;/p&gt;


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fikri Bamahry ◽  
Kyriakos Balidakis ◽  
Robert Heinkelmann ◽  
Harald Schuh

&lt;p&gt;How far apart can two space geodetic sites be located to consider the integrated water vapor (hereinafter IWV) trends as equal, from a statistical viewpoint? How to do efficient feature selection with a given IWV time series? To address these questions, we utilize spatio-temporal variations of long-term IWV trends that were estimated employing very long baseline interferometry (VLBI), Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), and numerical weather prediction data (ERA5 reanalysis). We estimate coefficients for several spatial covariance functions; Hirvonen's model proves to be the most precise for our area of interest, Greater Europe. We find that the effective spatial resolution is around 56 km (for error level (p) &lt; 0.05). Our investigations indicate that among else, altitude and proximity to the ocean are key factors affecting the IWV trend decorrelation lengths. We find good agreement between the spatially varying decorrelation lengths and established climate classification systems such as the latest K&amp;#246;ppen-Geiger model. Moreover, the IWV trend variation as a function of data span and temporal resolution has been investigated. We find that varying the temporal resolution from one hour up to 30 days does not yield a statistically significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) in the IWV trend and its uncertainty, provided the inherent autocorrelation is factored in and the data span remains. We also find that given the IWV time series length, the spread calculated from the estimated trends varying the start point of the time series, follows an exponential decrease &lt;em&gt;&amp;#963;&lt;/em&gt;(&amp;#916;&lt;em&gt;t&lt;/em&gt;) = 22&amp;#916;&lt;em&gt;t&lt;/em&gt; &lt;sup&gt;-1.7&lt;/sup&gt; + 0.008.&lt;/p&gt;


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document