P45. How Increasing Lumbar Disc Space Height Affects the Lumbar Facet Joint

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 105S-106S
Author(s):  
Jiayong Liu ◽  
Nabil A. Ebraheim ◽  
Steve P. Haman ◽  
Chris G. Sanford ◽  
Richard A. Yeasting
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Chao Wang ◽  
Jiabin Yuan ◽  
Zebin Huang ◽  
Zhicai Shi

The research aimed at discussing the analytic function of convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm-based magnetic resonance images (MRI) in the correlation between lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and angle and irregular variation of joint (IVJ) of lumbar facet-joint (LFJ). First, CNN-based MRI (CNNM) algorithm was constructed, and Markov random field (MRF) and fuzzy C-means (FCM) algorithms were introduced for comparison. Meanwhile, all patients received MRI examination of lumbar, and CNNM algorithm was adopted in MRI images. The results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision (98.53%, 93.65%, 99.56%, and 98.74%, respectively) of the CNNM algorithm were all superior to those of MRF algorithm (90.41%, 81.11%, 91.18%, and 91.13%, respectively) and of FCM algorithm (93.14%, 82.86%, 93.23%, and 93.08%, respectively) ( P < 0.05 ). Besides, the lumbar spine angles of L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 (6.03 ± 1.34°, 7.14 ± 1.18°, and 8.96 ± 3.26°, respectively) in the experimental group was obviously less than those in the control group (6.84 ± 1.15°, 9.85 ± 1.25°, and 17.34 ± 4.79°, respectively) ( P < 0.05 ). In the experimental group, there was irregular mutation of LFJ in 78 cases, while 8 cases suffered from irregular mutation of LFJ in the control group. The proportions of protrusion in L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 segments (11 cases, 53 cases, and 14 cases, respectively) was higher than that in the control group (1 case, 5 cases, and 2 cases, respectively) ( P < 0.05 ). In short, the constructed CNNM algorithm had excellent performance in diagnosing lumbar MRI images and had clinical research and promotion value. Moreover, the IVJ of patients with LDH was notably increased, most of the physiological angle of the lumbar spine changed, and facet joint was correlated with the occurrence of LDH.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Feng Gao ◽  
Mingcan Wu

This work aimed to explore the relationship between spine surgery lumbar facet joint (LFJ) and lumbar disc herniation (LDH) via compressed sensing algorithm-based MRI images to analyze the clinical symptoms of patients with residual neurological symptoms after LDH. Under weighted BM3D denoising, Epigraph method was introduced to establish the novel CSMRI reconstruction algorithm (BEMRI). 127 patients with LDH were taken as the research objects. The BEMRI algorithm was compared with others regarding peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM). Patients’ bilateral LFJ angles were compared. The relationships between LFJ angles, lumbar disc degeneration, and LFJ degeneration were analyzed. It turned out that the PSNR and SSIM of BEMRI algorithm were evidently superior to those of other algorithms. The proportion of patients with grade IV degeneration was at most 31.76%. Lumbar disc grading was positively correlated with change grading of LFJ degeneration ( P < 0.001 ). LFJ asymmetry was positively correlated with LFJ degeneration grade and LDH ( P < 0.001 ). Incidence of residual neurological symptoms in patients aged 61–70 years was as high as 63.77%. The proportion of patients with severe urinary excretion disorders was 71.96%. Therefore, the BEMRI algorithm improved the quality of MRI images. Degeneration of LDH was positively correlated with degeneration of LFJ. Asymmetry of LFJ was notably positively correlated with the degeneration of LFJ and LDH. Patients aged 61–70 years had a high incidence of residual neurological symptoms after surgery, most of which were manifested as urinary excretion disorders.


1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 452???453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Fujiwara ◽  
Kazuya Tamai ◽  
Minoru Yamato ◽  
Hiroyuki Yoshida ◽  
Koichi Saotome

2008 ◽  
Vol 2;11 (3;2) ◽  
pp. 121-132
Author(s):  
Laxmaiah Manchikanti

Background: Lumbar facet joints have been implicated as the source of chronic pain in 15% to 45% of patients with chronic low back pain. Various therapeutic techniques including intraarticular injections, medial branch blocks, and radiofrequency neurotomy of lumbar facet joint nerves have been described in the alleviation of chronic low back pain of facet joint origin. Objective: The study was conducted to determine the clinical effectiveness of therapeutic local anesthetic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with or without steroid in managing chronic function-limiting low back pain of facet joint origin. Design: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Setting: An interventional pain management setting in the United States. Methods: This study included 60 patients in Group I with local anesthetic and 60 patients in Group II with local anesthetic and steroid. The inclusion criteria was based on the positive response to the diagnostic controlled comparative local anesthetic lumbar facet joint blocks. Outcome measures: Numeric pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index, opioid intake, and work status. All outcome assessments were performed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Results: Significant improvement with significant pain relief (> 50%) and functional improvement (> 40%) were observed in 82% and 85% in Group I, with significant pain relief in over 82% of the patients and improvement in functional status in 78% of the patients. Based on the results of the present study, it appears that patients may experience significant pain relief 44 to 45 weeks of 1 year, requiring approximately 3 to 4 treatments with an average relief of 15 weeks per episode of treatment. Conclusion: Therapeutic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks, with or without steroid, may provide a management option for chronic function-limiting low back pain of facet joint origin. Key words: Chronic low back pain, lumbar facet or zygapophysial joint pain, facet joint nerve or medial branch blocks, comparative controlled local anesthetic blocks, therapeutic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks


2012 ◽  
Vol 6;15 (6;12) ◽  
pp. E869-E907
Author(s):  
Frank J.E. Falco

Background: Lumbar facet joints are a well recognized source of low back pain and referred pain in the lower extremity in patients with chronic low back pain. Conventional clinical features and other non-invasive diagnostic modalities are unreliable in diagnosing lumbar zygapophysial joint pain. Controlled diagnostic studies with at least 80% pain relief as the criterion standard have shown the prevalence of lumbar facet joint pain to be 16% to 41% of patients with chronic low back pain without disc displacement or radiculitis, with a false-positive rate of 17% to 49% with a single diagnostic block. Study Design: A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks. Objective: To determine and update the diagnostic accuracy of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in the assessment of chronic low back pain. Methods: A methodological quality assessment of included studies was performed using Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL). Only diagnostic accuracy studies meeting at least 50% of the designated inclusion criteria were utilized for analysis. Studies scoring less than 50% are presented descriptively and analyzed critically. The level of evidence was classified as good, fair, and limited or poor based on the quality of evidence developed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Data sources included relevant literature identified through searches of PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to June 2012, and manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles. Outcome Measures: Studies must have been performed utilizing controlled local anesthetic blocks. Pain relief was categorized as at least 50% pain relief from baseline pain and the ability to perform previously painful movements. Results: A total of 25 diagnostic accuracy studies were included. Of these, one study evaluated 50% to 74% relief as criterion standard with a single block with prevalence of 48%, 4 studies evaluated 75% to 100% relief as the criterion standard with a single block with a prevalence of 31% to 61%, 5 studies evaluated 50% to 74% relief as the criterion standard with controlled blocks with a prevalence of 15% to 61%, and 13 studies evaluated 75% to 100% relief as the criterion standard with controlled blocks with a prevalence of 25% to 45% in heterogenous populations. False-positive rates ranged from 17% to 66% in the 50% to 74% pain relief group and 27% to 49% with at least 75% relief as the criterion standard. Based on this evaluation, the evidence showed that there is good evidence for diagnostic facet joint nerve blocks with 75% to 100% pain relief as the criterion standard with dual blocks and fair evidence with 50% to 74% pain relief as the criterion standard with controlled diagnostic blocks; however, the evidence is poor with single diagnostic blocks of 50% to 74%, and limited for 75% or more pain relief as the criterion standard. Limitations: The shortcomings of this systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks include a paucity of literature and continued debate on an appropriate gold standard. Conclusion: There is good evidence for diagnostic facet joint nerve blocks with 75% to 100% pain relief as the criterion standard with dual blocks, with fair evidence with 50% to 74% pain relief. Key words: Chronic low back pain, lumbar facet or zygapophysial joint pain, facet joint nerve blocks, medial branch blocks, controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks


Spine ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1304-1306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk M. Dauwe ◽  
Jan J. Van Oyen ◽  
Ignace R. Samson ◽  
Michel J. Hoogmartens

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document