scholarly journals Deep Learning-Based Denoised MRI Images for Correlation Analysis between Lumbar Facet Joint and Lumbar Disc Herniation in Spine Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Feng Gao ◽  
Mingcan Wu

This work aimed to explore the relationship between spine surgery lumbar facet joint (LFJ) and lumbar disc herniation (LDH) via compressed sensing algorithm-based MRI images to analyze the clinical symptoms of patients with residual neurological symptoms after LDH. Under weighted BM3D denoising, Epigraph method was introduced to establish the novel CSMRI reconstruction algorithm (BEMRI). 127 patients with LDH were taken as the research objects. The BEMRI algorithm was compared with others regarding peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM). Patients’ bilateral LFJ angles were compared. The relationships between LFJ angles, lumbar disc degeneration, and LFJ degeneration were analyzed. It turned out that the PSNR and SSIM of BEMRI algorithm were evidently superior to those of other algorithms. The proportion of patients with grade IV degeneration was at most 31.76%. Lumbar disc grading was positively correlated with change grading of LFJ degeneration ( P < 0.001 ). LFJ asymmetry was positively correlated with LFJ degeneration grade and LDH ( P < 0.001 ). Incidence of residual neurological symptoms in patients aged 61–70 years was as high as 63.77%. The proportion of patients with severe urinary excretion disorders was 71.96%. Therefore, the BEMRI algorithm improved the quality of MRI images. Degeneration of LDH was positively correlated with degeneration of LFJ. Asymmetry of LFJ was notably positively correlated with the degeneration of LFJ and LDH. Patients aged 61–70 years had a high incidence of residual neurological symptoms after surgery, most of which were manifested as urinary excretion disorders.

2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 87-94
Author(s):  
Qi Lai ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Runsheng Guo ◽  
Xin Lv ◽  
Qiang Wang ◽  
...  

Purpose: To investigate the association of facet joint asymmetry with lumbar disc herniation at the lower lumbar spine. Methods: A total of 90 patients (ages 18–40 years) with single-level disc herniation (L3–L4, L4–L5, or L5–S1) were included in the study. Facet asymmetry was defined as a difference of 10° in facet joint angles between right and left sides. Normal discs in the same segment of other individuals were used as a control. Patients had facet asymmetry measured for L3 to S1 through 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging, and information was collected, including age, sex, degenerative degree of lumbar facet joints, and the presence or absence of lumbar disc herniation and type. Results: At the L3 to L4 level, 2 cases had facet asymmetry in 8 patients with lumbar disc herniation, compared with 17 cases of facet asymmetry in 82 patients without disc herniation (P = 0.7776, r = 0.030). At the L4 to L5 level, there were 21 cases of facet asymmetry in 45 patients with lumbar disc herniation, compared with 5 cases of asymmetry in 45 patients without disc herniation (P = 0.00019, r = 0.392). At the L5 to S1 level, there were 25 cases of facet asymmetry in 37 patients with lumbar disc herniation, compared with 11 cases of facet asymmetry in 53 patients without disc herniation (P = 0.0000, r = 0.492). There were 23 cases of facet asymmetry in 28 disc herniations of side type compared with 2 cases of facet asymmetry in 9 herniations of center type (P = 0.0008, r = 0.364). There was no significant difference in the relationship between age, facet joint degeneration, and lumbar facet joint asymmetry (P &gt; 0.05). Conclusion: Facet asymmetry is significantly associated with lumbar disc herniation at the L4 to L5 and the L5 to S1 levels, whereas there is an obvious association with the side type of lumbar disc herniation at the L5 to S1 level.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Ye ◽  
Wang Xiaodong ◽  
Zhang zepei ◽  
Deepak shrestha ◽  
Li Kepeng ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The relationship between facet tropism (FT) and lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is not clear. In the present study, MRI was used to assess the relationship between lumbar facet joint tropism and disc herniation. This paper is the first to assess the relationship between facet joint tropism and LDH from the sagittal view. Methods 122 patients (154 segments) with lumbar disc herniation and 102 normal subjects (306 segments) who visited our hospital from 01-Jan-2020 to 01-Apr-2020 were included in this study. The axial and sagittal angles of facet joints were measured using an MRI scan. The difference of 10° in facet angles between left and right was defined as lumbar facet tropism. The relationship between the two was analyzed. Results In the axial, 95/154 segments with lumbar disc herniation had FT whereas, 48/258 segments had FT in the normal segments(p<0.01). In the sagittal, 61/154 segments with lumbar disc herniation had FT and 48/306 had FT in the control(p<0.01). Conclusion The proportion of FT is better in patients with lumbar disc herniation, and there is a significant correlation between FT and lumbar disc herniation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Chao Wang ◽  
Jiabin Yuan ◽  
Zebin Huang ◽  
Zhicai Shi

The research aimed at discussing the analytic function of convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm-based magnetic resonance images (MRI) in the correlation between lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and angle and irregular variation of joint (IVJ) of lumbar facet-joint (LFJ). First, CNN-based MRI (CNNM) algorithm was constructed, and Markov random field (MRF) and fuzzy C-means (FCM) algorithms were introduced for comparison. Meanwhile, all patients received MRI examination of lumbar, and CNNM algorithm was adopted in MRI images. The results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision (98.53%, 93.65%, 99.56%, and 98.74%, respectively) of the CNNM algorithm were all superior to those of MRF algorithm (90.41%, 81.11%, 91.18%, and 91.13%, respectively) and of FCM algorithm (93.14%, 82.86%, 93.23%, and 93.08%, respectively) ( P < 0.05 ). Besides, the lumbar spine angles of L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 (6.03 ± 1.34°, 7.14 ± 1.18°, and 8.96 ± 3.26°, respectively) in the experimental group was obviously less than those in the control group (6.84 ± 1.15°, 9.85 ± 1.25°, and 17.34 ± 4.79°, respectively) ( P < 0.05 ). In the experimental group, there was irregular mutation of LFJ in 78 cases, while 8 cases suffered from irregular mutation of LFJ in the control group. The proportions of protrusion in L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 segments (11 cases, 53 cases, and 14 cases, respectively) was higher than that in the control group (1 case, 5 cases, and 2 cases, respectively) ( P < 0.05 ). In short, the constructed CNNM algorithm had excellent performance in diagnosing lumbar MRI images and had clinical research and promotion value. Moreover, the IVJ of patients with LDH was notably increased, most of the physiological angle of the lumbar spine changed, and facet joint was correlated with the occurrence of LDH.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Ye ◽  
Wang Xiaodong ◽  
Zhang Zepei ◽  
Deepak Shrestha ◽  
Li Kepeng ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The relationship between facet tropism (FT) and lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is not clear. In the present study, MRI was used to assess the relationship between lumbar facet joint tropism and disc herniation. This paper is the first to assess the relationship between facet joint tropism and LDH from the sagittal view. Methods 122 patients (154 segments) with lumbar disc herniation and 102 normal subjects (306 segments) who visited our hospital from 01-Jan-2020 to 01-Apr-2020 were included in this study. The axial and sagittal angles of facet joints were measured using an MRI scan. The difference of 10° in facet angles between left and right was defined as lumbar facet tropism. The relationship between the two was analyzed. Results In the axial, 95/154 segments with lumbar disc herniation had FT whereas, 48/258 segments had FT in the normal segments(p < 0.01). In the sagittal, 61/154 segments with lumbar disc herniation had FT and 48/306 had FT in the control(p < 0.01). Conclusion The proportion of FT is better in patients with lumbar disc herniation, and there is a significant correlation between FT and lumbar disc herniation.


2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilhan Karacan ◽  
Teoman Aydin ◽  
Muharrem Cidem ◽  
Safak Sahir Karamehmetoglu

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengzheng Kuai ◽  
Weiqiang Liu ◽  
Run Ji ◽  
Wenyu Zhou

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the compensatory response of the muscle activities of seventeen major muscle groups in the spinal region, intradiscal forces of the five lumbar motion segment units (MSUs), and facet forces acting on the ten lumbar facet joints in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Twenty-six healthy adults and seven LDH patients performed trunk flexion, ipsilateral picking up, and contralateral picking up in sequence. Eight optical markers were placed on the landmarks of the pelvis and spinal process. The coordinates of these markers were captured to drive a musculoskeletal model to calculate the muscle activities, intradiscal forces, and facet forces. The muscle activities of the majority of the seventeen major muscle groups were found increases in LDH patients. In addition, the LDH patients displayed larger compressive forces and anteroposterior forces on all the five lumbar MSUs and more lumbar facet inventions on most facet joints. These findings suggest that the LDH patients demonstrate compensatory increases in the most trunk muscle activities and all spinal loads. These negative compensatory responses increase the risk of the aggravation of disc herniation. Therefore, treatment should intervene as earlier as possible for the severe LDH patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 194-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shearwood McClelland ◽  
Jeffrey A. Goldstein

ABSTRACT Background: Spine surgery has been transformed significantly by the growth of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures. Easily marketable to patients as less invasive with smaller incisions, MIS is often perceived as superior to traditional open spine surgery. The highest quality evidence comparing MIS with open spine surgery was examined. Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving MIS versus open spine surgery was performed using the Entrez gateway of the PubMed database for articles published in English up to December 28, 2015. RCTs and systematic reviews of RCTs of MIS versus open spine surgery were evaluated for three particular entities: Cervical disc herniation, lumbar disc herniation, and posterior lumbar fusion. Results: A total of 17 RCTs were identified, along with six systematic reviews. For cervical disc herniation, MIS provided no difference in overall function, arm pain relief, or long-term neck pain. In lumbar disc herniation, MIS was inferior in providing leg/low back pain relief, rehospitalization rates, quality of life improvement, and exposed the surgeon to >10 times more radiation in return for shorter hospital stay and less surgical site infection. In posterior lumbar fusion, MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) had significantly reduced 2-year societal cost, fewer medical complications, reduced time to return to work, and improved short-term Oswestry Disability Index scores at the cost of higher revision rates, higher readmission rates, and more than twice the amount of intraoperative fluoroscopy. Conclusion: The highest levels of evidence do not support MIS over open surgery for cervical or lumbar disc herniation. However, MIS TLIF demonstrates advantages along with higher revision/readmission rates. Regardless of patient indication, MIS exposes the surgeon to significantly more radiation; it is unclear how this impacts patients. These results should optimize informed decision-making regarding MIS versus open spine surgery, particularly in the current advertising climate greatly favoring MIS.


2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 105S-106S
Author(s):  
Jiayong Liu ◽  
Nabil A. Ebraheim ◽  
Steve P. Haman ◽  
Chris G. Sanford ◽  
Richard A. Yeasting

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document