Obstacles to Early Mobilization After Spinal Fusion and Effect on Hospital Length of Stay

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. S168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Ferrel
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takroni MA ◽  
Albarrati A ◽  
Akomolafe T ◽  
Al Enazy M

Introduction: Early Mobilization (EM) of patients in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) has received considerable attention in scientific literature over the past several years. It has been reported that EM decrease Hospital Length of Stay (LOS).


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Goldfarb ◽  
Diana Dima ◽  
Yves Langlois

Introduction: Early mobilization (EM) is recommended by cardiac surgical societies. However, the optimal method of EM delivery has yet to be determined. Our objective was to assess whether a bedside nurse-driven EM strategy is safe and associated with improved outcomes following cardiac surgery. Methods: Consecutive post-cardiac surgery patients in a cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) at an academic tertiary care centre from 2017 to 2019 prior to and after EM program implementation were reviewed. Postoperative cardiac surgery patients were initially managed in a general ICU and transferred to the CVICU when hemodynamic stability was achieved, typically postoperative day 1 or 2. Functional status was assessed by the nurse on CVICU admission using the Level of Function (LOF) Mobility Scale, which ranges from LOF 0 (bed immobile) to LOF 5 (walks > 50 feet). The nurse uses the LOF score to guide twice-daily level-specific mobility activities. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay. Results: There were 504 patients included in the study (preintervention, N=329; Intervention, N=175). There was no difference in age, sex or comorbid illness between the groups (Table). The LOF was 4.7 ± 0.5 prior to surgery, 3.4 ± 1.1 on CVICU admission, and 4.3 ± 0.6 on CVICU discharge in patients undergoing EM. Patients were mobilized during nearly all mobilization opportunities (98.7%; 685/694). Adverse events were rare (0.4%; 8 events/1901 mobilization activities), minor and transient. There was no difference is postoperative hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, discharge home or 30-day hospital re-admission (all P>0.05). Conclusion: A nurse-driven EM program was safe and associated with improvement in functional status in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. The EM program was not associated with improved short-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to understand optimal delivery of EM in cardiac surgical patients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. S103-S104
Author(s):  
Mladen Djurasovic ◽  
Eric Kiskaddon ◽  
Kelly R. Bratcher ◽  
Farah Ammous ◽  
Steven D. Glassman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S98-S98
Author(s):  
Corey J Medler ◽  
Mary Whitney ◽  
Juan Galvan-Cruz ◽  
Ron Kendall ◽  
Rachel Kenney ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Unnecessary and prolonged IV vancomycin exposure increases risk of adverse drug events, notably nephrotoxicity, which may result in prolonged hospital length of stay. The purpose of this study is to identify areas of improvement in antimicrobial stewardship for vancomycin appropriateness by clinical pharmacists at the time of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Methods Retrospective, observational cohort study at an academic medical center and a community hospital. Inclusion: patient over 18 years, received at least three days of IV vancomycin where the clinical pharmacy TDM service assessed for appropriate continuation for hospital admission between June 19, 2019 and June 30, 2019. Exclusion: vancomycin prophylaxis or administered by routes other than IV. Primary outcome was to determine the frequency and clinical components of inappropriate vancomycin continuation at the time of TDM. Inappropriate vancomycin continuation was defined as cultures positive for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant bacteria, and non-purulent skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) in the absence of vasopressors. Data was reported using descriptive statistics and measures of central tendency. Results 167 patients met inclusion criteria with 38.3% from the ICU. SSTIs were most common indication 39 (23.4%) cases, followed by pneumonia and blood with 34 (20.4%) cases each. At time of vancomycin TDM assessment, vancomycin continuation was appropriate 59.3% of the time. Mean of 4.22 ± 2.69 days of appropriate vancomycin use, 2.18 ± 2.47 days of inappropriate use, and total duration 5.42 ± 2.94. 16.4% patients developed an AKI. Majority of missed opportunities were attributed to non-purulent SSTI (28.2%) and missed MRSA nares swabs in 21% pneumonia cases (table 1). Conclusion Vancomycin is used extensively for empiric treatment of presumed infections. Appropriate de-escalation of vancomycin therapy is important to decrease the incidence of adverse effects, decreasing hospital length of stay, and reduce development of resistance. According to the mean duration of inappropriate therapy, there are opportunities for pharmacy and antibiotic stewardship involvement at the time of TDM to optimize patient care (table 1). Missed opportunities for vancomycin de-escalation Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352110114
Author(s):  
Andrew Nyce ◽  
Snehal Gandhi ◽  
Brian Freeze ◽  
Joshua Bosire ◽  
Terry Ricca ◽  
...  

Prolonged waiting times are associated with worse patient experience in patients discharged from the emergency department (ED). However, it is unclear which component of the waiting times is most impactful to the patient experience and the impact on hospitalized patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of ED patients between July 2018 and March 30, 2020. In all, 3278 patients were included: 1477 patients were discharged from the ED, and 1680 were admitted. Discharged patients had a longer door-to-first provider and door-to-doctor time, but a shorter doctor-to-disposition, disposition-to-departure, and total ED time when compared to admitted patients. Some, but not all, components of waiting times were significantly higher in patients with suboptimal experience (<100th percentile). Prolonged door-to-doctor time was significantly associated with worse patient experience in discharged patients and in patients with hospital length of stay ≤4 days. Prolonged ED waiting times were significantly associated with worse patient experience in patients who were discharged from the ED and in inpatients with short length of stay. Door-to-doctor time seems to have the highest impact on the patient’s experience of these 2 groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document