215. Assessing key functional outcomes after multilevel fusion for adult spinal deformity in patients over 60 years of age: A prospective, observational, multicenter study with two-year follow-up

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To compare the outcomes of patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) following spinal fusion with the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) at L4/L5 versus S1/ilium. Methods: A multicenter ASD database was evaluated. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on LIV levels—groups L (fusion to L4/L5) and S (fusion to S1/ilium). Both groups were propensity matched by age and preoperative radiographic alignments. Patient demographics, operative details, radiographic parameters, revision rates, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores were compared. Results: Overall, 349 patients had complete data, with a mean follow-up of 46 months. Patients in group S (n = 311) were older and had larger sagittal and coronal plane deformities than those in group L (n = 38). After matching, 28 patients were allocated to each group with similar demographic, radiographic, and clinical parameters. Sagittal alignment restoration at postoperative week 6 was significantly better in group S than in group L, but it was similar in both groups at the 2-year follow-up. Fusion to S1/ilium involved a longer operating time, higher PJK rates, and greater PJK angles than that to L4/L5. There were no significant differences in the complication and revision rates between the groups. Both groups showed significant improvements in HRQOL scores. Conclusions: Fusion to S1/ilium had better sagittal alignment restoration at postoperative week 6 and involved higher PJK rates and greater PJK angles than that to L4/L5. The clinical outcomes and rates of revision surgery and complications were similar between the groups.

Download Full-text

The Natural History of Progression in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Radiographic Analysis

Global Spine Journal ◽

10.1177/2192568219845659 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 10 (3) ◽

pp. 272-279 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Sayf S. A. Faraj ◽

Niek te Hennepe ◽

Miranda L. van Hooff ◽

Martin Pouw ◽

Marinus de Kleuver ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prognostic Factors ◽

Cobb Angle ◽

Spinal Deformity ◽

Sagittal Plane ◽

Adult Spinal Deformity ◽

Coronal Plane ◽

Historical Cohort ◽

Curve Magnitude ◽

Nonsurgical Patients

Study Design: Historical cohort study. Objective: To evaluate progression in the coronal and sagittal planes in nonsurgical patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Methods: A retrospective analysis of nonsurgical ASD patients between 2005 and 2017 was performed. Magnitude of the coronal and sagittal planes were compared on the day of presentation and at most recent follow-up. Previous reported prognostic factors for progression in the coronal plane, including the direction of scoliosis, curve magnitude, and the position of the intercrest line (passing through L4 or L5 vertebra), were studied. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included with a mean follow-up of 59.8 ± 34.5 months. Progression in the coronal plane was seen in 72% of patients. Mean Cobb angle on the day of presentation and most recent follow-up was 37.2 ± 14.6° and 40.8° ± 16.5°, respectively. No significant differences were found in curve progression in left- versus right-sided scoliosis (3.3 ± 7.1 vs 3.7 ± 5.4, P = .81), Cobb angle <30° versus ≥30° (2.6 ± 5.0 vs 4.3 ± 6.5, P = .30), or when the intercrest line passed through L4 rather than L5 vertebra (3.4 ± 5.0° vs 3.8 ± 7.1°, P = .79). No significant differences were found in the sagittal plane between presentation and most recent follow-up. Conclusions: This is the first study that describes progression in the coronal and sagittal planes in nonsurgical patients with ASD. Previous reported prognostic factors were not confirmed as truly relevant. Although progression appears to occur, large variation exists and these results may not be directly applicable to the individual patient.

Download Full-text

Predicting Satisfied, Nondepressed with Optimal Self-Image Patients at Two-Year Follow-Up: Propensity Matched Comparisons in Operative and Nonoperative Adult Spinal Deformity Cohorts

The Spine Journal ◽

10.1016/j.spinee.2016.07.446 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 16 (10) ◽

pp. S345

Author(s):

Bassel G. Diebo ◽

Cyrus M. Jalai ◽

Gregory W. Poorman ◽

Barthelemy Liabaud ◽

Thomas J. Errico ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Spinal Deformity ◽

Adult Spinal Deformity ◽

Self Image

Download Full-text

Strategies for prevention of rod fracture in adult spinal deformity: cobalt chrome rod, accessory rod technique, and lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/2020.8.spine201037 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-10

Author(s):

Ki Young Lee ◽

Jung-Hee Lee ◽

Kyung-Chung Kang ◽

Sang-Kyu Im ◽

Hae Seong Lim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Spinal Deformity ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Sagittal Alignment ◽

Adult Spinal Deformity ◽

Deformity Correction ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Patient Factors ◽

Rod Fracture ◽

Cobalt Chrome

OBJECTIVERestoring the proper sagittal alignment in adult spinal deformity (ASD) can improve radiological and clinical outcomes, but pseudarthrosis including rod fracture (RF) is a common problematic complication. The purpose of this study was to analyze the methods for reducing the incidence of RF in deformity correction of ASD.METHODSThe authors retrospectively selected 178 consecutive patients (mean age 70.8 years) with lumbar degenerative kyphosis (LDK) who underwent deformity correction with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were classified into the non-RF group (n = 131) and the RF group (n = 47). For predicting the crucial factors of RF, patient factors, radiographic parameters, and surgical factors were analyzed.RESULTSThe overall incidence of RF was 26% (47/178 cases), occurring in 42% (42/100 cases) of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), 7% (5/67 cases) of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with posterior column osteotomy, 18% (23/129 cases) of cobalt chrome rods, 49% (24/49 cases) of titanium alloy rods, 6% (2/36 cases) placed with the accessory rod technique, and 32% (45/142 cases) placed with the 2-rod technique. There were no significant differences in the incidence of RF regarding patient factors between two groups. While both groups showed severe sagittal imbalance before operation, lumbar lordosis (LL) was more kyphotic and pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL (PI-LL) mismatch was greater in the RF group (p < 0.05). Postoperatively, while LL and PI-LL did not show significant differences between the two groups, LL and sagittal vertical axis correction were greater in the RF group (p < 0.05). Nonetheless, at the last follow-up, the two groups did not show significant differences in radiographic parameters except thoracolumbar junctional angles. As for surgical factors, use of the cobalt chrome rod and the accessory rod technique was significantly greater in the non-RF group (p < 0.05). As for the correction method, PSO was associated with more RFs than the other correction methods, including LLIF (p < 0.05). By logistic regression analysis, PSO, preoperative PI-LL mismatch, and the accessory rod technique were crucial factors for RF.CONCLUSIONSGreater preoperative sagittal spinopelvic malalignment including preoperative PI-LL mismatch was the crucial risk factor for RF in LDK patients 65 years or older. For restoring and maintaining sagittal alignment, use of the cobalt chrome rod, accessory rod technique, or LLIF was shown to be effective for reducing RF in ASD surgery.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Prospective Multicenter, Propensity-Matched Cohort Assessment with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up *

50 Landmark Papers ◽

10.1201/9781315154053-41 ◽

2018 ◽

pp. 211-215

Author(s):

Ryan P. McLynn ◽

Jonathan N. Grauer

Keyword(s):

Spinal Deformity ◽

Adult Spinal Deformity ◽

Nonoperative Treatment ◽

Matched Cohort

Download Full-text

The effect of upper instrumented vertebra level (T9 vs T10) on radiologic and functional outcomes in the surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity in osteoporotic patients over 60 years of age

Brain and Spine ◽

10.1016/j.bas.2021.100134 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 ◽

pp. 100134

Author(s):

Sina Coskun ◽

Sinan Kahraman ◽

Mustafa Eltayep ◽

Recep Dincer ◽

Ahmet Ates ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Surgical Treatment ◽

Spinal Deformity ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

Adult Spinal Deformity ◽

Upper Instrumented Vertebra

Download Full-text

Comparison of Radiographic And Clinical Outcomes Observed After Adult Spinal Deformity Correction Using Iliac Screw Versus S2-Alar-Iliac Screw

10.21203/rs.3.rs-492643/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Qiang Luo ◽

Yong-Chan Kim ◽

Ki-Tack Kim ◽

Kee-Yong Ha ◽

Joonghyun Ahn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Spinal Deformity ◽

Lumbar Lordosis ◽

Adult Spinal Deformity ◽

Deformity Correction ◽

Postoperative Change ◽

Iliac Screw ◽

Vas Scores ◽

Correction Surgery

Abstract Background: To date, there is a paucity of reports clarifying the change of spinopelvic parameters in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent long segment spinal fusion using iliac screw (IS) and S2-alar-iliac screw (S2AI) fixation.Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients underwent deformity correction surgery for ASD between 2013 and 2017 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether IS or S2AI fixation was performed. All radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and the last follow-up. Demographics, intraoperative and clinical data were analyzed between the two groups. Additionally, the cohort was subdivided according to the postoperative change in pelvic incidence (PI): subgroup (C) was defined as change in PI ≥5° and subgroup (NC) with change <5°. In subgroup analyses, the 2 different types of postoperative change of PI were directly compared.Results: A total of 142 patients met inclusion criteria: 111 who received IS and 31 received S2AI fixation. The IS group (65.6 ± 26, 39.8 ± 13.8) showed a significantly higher change in lumbar lordosis (LL) and upper lumbar lordosis (ULL) than the S2AI group (54.4 ± 17.9, 30.3 ± 9.9) (p<0.05). In subgroup (C), PI significantly increased from 53° preoperatively to 59° postoperatively at least 50% of IS cohort, with a mean change of 5.8° (p<0.05). The clinical outcomes at the last follow-up were significantly better in IS group than in S2AI group in terms of VAS scores for back and leg. The occurrence of sacroiliac joint pain and pelvic screw fracture were significantly greater in S2AI group than in IS group (25.8% vs 9%, p<0.05) and (16.1% vs 3.6%, p<0.05).Conclusions: IS fixation showed a greater change in LL and ULL than S2AI fixation in ASD surgery. PI may be changed under certain circumstances.

Download Full-text