Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy with regional lymphadenectomy for pTis and pT1 ampullary carcinoma

Surgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 151 (4) ◽  
pp. 510-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geng Chen ◽  
Huaizhi Wang ◽  
Yudong Fan ◽  
Leida Zhang ◽  
Jun Ding ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 456-456
Author(s):  
Ashish Manne ◽  
Sushanth Reddy ◽  
Peng Li ◽  
Carlo M. Contreras ◽  
John Christein ◽  
...  

456 Background: Ampullary carcinoma [AC] is a rare malignancy associated with favorable prognosis among pancreatobiliary tumors. Pancreaticoduodenectomy [PDY] is considered to be curative for early stage cancers. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy [CT] or combination chemoradiation [CRT] remains uncertain for stage I/II. In this analysis we reviewed our institution’s experience with AC. Methods: From 2005 to 2015, 62 patients with stage 1 and 2 AC with at least one year follow up after PDY were reviewed. Clinical and pathologic factors and disease status were obtained from chart review. The patients’ demographical and oncological characteristics are summarized. The univariate Cox proportional hazard model was conducted for evaluating the parameters associated with overall survival. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank was used to compare the time-to-events. Results: Adjuvant treatment was administered in 61%: CT (32%), CRT (29%) 39% surgical alone. The median overall survival [OS] for the study cohort is 60 months with 3 yr OS at 58% and 5 yr OS at 50%. Recurrence noted in 21% of patients. About half of patients surviving five years were alive at 10 years. Lymph node [LN] metastases (57%) predicted worse PFS (HR 2.29, 95% CI (1.13-4.61), p = 0.021) but did not significantly affect OS (HR 1.2, 95% CI (0.84-3.61);p = 0.13). There were no postoperative deaths following surgery.Peri- pancreatic extension [PPE] (20%) and peri-neural invasion [PNI] (16%) was also found to be determinants for poor OS. Current data did not suggest lympho-vascular invasion (24%) predict OS (HR 1.20, 95% CI (0.49, 2.96);p = 0.63 or PFS(HR 1.45 (0.65, 3.20),p = 0.36). When compared to surgery alone adjuvant CT or CRT had no statistically significant difference in terms of PFS (p = 0.53) or OS (p = 0.96). Conclusions: The use of adjuvant treatment may be most useful at improving long-term disease control in patients with high-risk features; however, no significant difference between CT and CRT was demonstrated in our series. This could be due to small sample size and needs further validation in larger cohort. PDY with regional lymphadenectomy is appropriate for early-stage AC, but worst outcomes seen in patients with PPE, PNI and LN involvement.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
SB Kim ◽  
MC Kim ◽  
MG Kang ◽  
JH Cho ◽  
JG Park ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S42-S43
Author(s):  
J.R. Bergquist ◽  
A. Li ◽  
M.M. Dua ◽  
B.C. Visser

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 670-677.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Chipollini ◽  
Dominic H. Tang ◽  
Pranav Sharma ◽  
Adam S. Baumgarten ◽  
Philippe E. Spiess

2003 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. A649
Author(s):  
Tjarda Van Heek ◽  
Anirban Maitra ◽  
Jens Koopmann ◽  
Neil Fedarko ◽  
Alka Jain ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 707-710
Author(s):  
Zenro Nihei ◽  
Masataka Saito ◽  
Renzo Hirayama ◽  
Yoshio Mishima

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document