penile carcinoma
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

486
(FIVE YEARS 55)

H-INDEX

53
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongkang Ma ◽  
Weijian Hao ◽  
Huaqi Yin ◽  
Mingkai Zhu ◽  
Bao Guan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Inguinal lymphadenectomy (iLAD) is effective for penile carcinoma treatment, but usually results in many complications. This study aims to clinically evaluate the feasibility and clinical significance of a laparoscopic radical iLAD approach partly preserving great saphenous vein branches for penile carcinoma patients. Methods: A total of 48 patients with penile cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical iLAD with retention of the great saphenous vein in Henan Cancer Hospital from 2012 Jan to 2020 Dec was included in this study. Sixteen penile carcinoma patients who underwent laparoscopic radical iLAD preserving parts of superficial branches of the great saphenous vein were identified as the sparing group, and the matched 32 patients who incised those branches were identified as control group. This new procedure was performed by laparoscopy, preserving parts of superficial branches of the great saphenous vein, superficial lateral and medial femoral veins. Clinicopathological features and perioperative variables were recorded. Postoperative complications, including skin flap necrosis, lymphorrhagia, and lower extremity edema were analyzed retrospectively. Results: We found that the operative time of the sparing group is significantly longer than the control group (p = 0.011). There was no statistical difference in intraoperative blood loss, the lymph node number per side, average time to remove the drainage tube and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. Compared to the control group, the sparing group showed a significantly decreased incidence of lower extremity edema (p = 0.018). The preservation of parts of superficial branches of the great saphenous vein was mainly decreased the incidence of edema below ankle (p = 0.034). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the iLAD with preserving parts of superficial branches of the great saphenous vein, with a decreased incidence of postoperative complications, is a safe and feasible approach for penile cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Juan Wang ◽  
Qingyan Liu ◽  
Mei Hong ◽  
Ge Li ◽  
Yong Cheng

Objective. To explore the efficacy of applying Kanglaite (KLT) injection under incentive nursing intervention (INI) in treating patients with advanced penile carcinoma and its effect on patient treatment compliance. Methods. The clinical data of 120 patients with advanced penile carcinoma treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from February 2019 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and the patients were equally divided into the experimental group (n = 60) and control group (n = 60) according to their admission order. All patients received the KLT injection treatment; those in the control group accepted the conventional nursing; and on this basis, those in the experimental group accepted INI, including psychological nursing intervention, which was conducted concurrently with the treatment, to compare their short-term efficacy, treatment compliance, degree of cancer-related fatigue (Brief Fatigue Inventory), and negative emotion scores (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) between the two groups. Results. Compared with the control group, the experimental group presented a significantly higher objective remission rate (58.3%) ( P < 0.05 ), higher rates of excellent and good treatment compliance ( P < 0.05 ), and lower degree of cancer-related fatigue and negative emotion scores ( P < 0.001 ). Conclusion. INI can improve the negative emotions in patients with advanced carcinoma of the penis, alleviate their degree of cancer-related fatigue, promote their treatment compliance, and achieve a more significant efficacy of applying the KLT injection treatment, so it should be promoted in practice.


Author(s):  
Nicolas Fernandez ◽  
Monica Medina ◽  
Hunter Wessells ◽  
Jaime Perez

Abstract Introduction and Objective The management of penile carcinoma is very disabling and mutilating, bur early treatment can be curative. Our group systematically performs oncological management with immediate penile reconstruction and preservation of the organ (partial penectomy, resurfacing, or glansectomy) when feasible. Due to the low incidence of penile carcinoma, it is difficult to achieve experience in penile reconstruction using free grafts in a standardized and reproducible way. Therefore, we herein present the results of the use of an inanimate model to identify the most efficient geometric way to procure and apply a free skin graft to reconstruct the penis. Methods A preclinical inanimate model of the penis was developed to simulate the surgical reconstruction using a free skin graft. Six different geometric skin-graft models were created and tested. For each of them, we measured graft's surface area as well as the discarded surface after placing the graft on the penis for reconstruction. We also measured the amount of suture lines required for reconstruction. All of these measurements in the six different models were compared. Results Based on the six models, we identified that the longitude of the graft must measure the same as the maximum perimeter of the glans in order to have a square that enables the complete coverage of the penile defect. The total graft area for the first 4 models was of 40 cm2; for models 5 and 6, it was of 60 cm2. The average discarded area of the graft was of 18.135 cm2 (range: 12 cm2 to 30 cm2). Models 4 years 6 were the ones with the least discarded tissue: 12 cm2. The average amount of suture lines to secure the different model grafts was 7.3 (range: 5 to 12). The models that required the least amount of suture lines were number 1 and 4, with a total of 5 suture lines. Conclusions The double trapezoid is the most efficient model to reconstruct the glans after organ-sparing oncological management. Our results contribute to establish a more standardized and predictable technique to reconstruct the penis.


2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 5623-5632
Author(s):  
Yanxiang Shao ◽  
Thongher Lia ◽  
Yaohui Wang ◽  
Kan Wu ◽  
Xu Hu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 13186-13197
Author(s):  
Paloma Menezes de Souza ◽  
Heidy Halanna de Melo Farah Rondon ◽  
Nicácio Acioli Barbosa Rosas ◽  
Victor Hugo Rodrigues Bandeira ◽  
Nayara Souza Castro ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego F. Sanchez ◽  
Maria Jose Fernandez-Nestosa ◽  
Sofia Canete-Portillo ◽  
Ingrid Rodriguez ◽  
Antonio L. Cubilla

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 2019-2026
Author(s):  
Jaqueline Diniz Pinho ◽  
Gyl Eanes Barros Silva ◽  
Antonio Augusto Lima Teixeira Júnior ◽  
Marta Regina de Castro Belfort ◽  
Juliana Melo Macedo Mendes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document