Structural relationships between second-language future self-image and the reading achievement of young Chinese language learners in Hong Kong

System ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 201-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Ka Wong
2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Fu Ruomei

Pinyin is a valuable tool for students who learn Chinese as a second language. Through years of teaching practice and observation, some errors in Indonesian students’ understanding and using in Pinyin were summed up, includingthe phonetic alphabet equated to the actual voice entirely caused the mispronunciation; lack of understanding in some special provisions in Pinyin caused the confusion of vowels “u” and “ü”; improperly placement of tone marks; did not understand the pinyin word-segmentation resulting in memory and understanding of Chinese based on Chinese characters instead of the word as a unit. These errors disturbed the accuracy of Chinese students’ pronunciation, caused problems in Chinese vocabulary understanding. It is very important for Indonesian Chinese language learners to lay a solid foundation of Pinyin and develop good habits in the use of Pinyin.


Author(s):  
Julita Wangi ◽  
Kelly Rosalin ◽  
Theresia Theresia

In the process of learning and using Chinese, Indonesia students may have grammatical errors due to negative migration of their native language. At present, there is no Mandarin grammar correction website or application that can answer the needs of Mandarin learners. Therefore, researchers want to try to provide a website chinesegrammarchecker.com that can answer the needs of Chinese language learners in Indonesia so as to facilitate Chinese language learners in mastering Chinese grammar. Hope researchers are learners can learn independently in making sentences in Chinese using proper and correct Chinese grammar. The method used in this study is a qualitative approach. The researcher will collect basic level Chinese grammar patterns in the textbooks used in the Chinese Language I courses, namely Er Ya Basic Chinese: Comprehensive Course (I) and Basic Chinese: Comprehensive Course (II). Then from these patterns user can check their sentences on this website. After the website chinesegrammarchecker.com was completed, then it was tested for several users to see the advantages and disadvantages of this website chinesegrammarchecker.com.


2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 312-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Scrimgeour

While Chinese language learning in Australian schools is characterised by predominantly second language programs for learners who have had no prior exposure to the target language, there is increasing participation by Australian-born children who speak Putonghua (Mandarin) or another dialect at home. Curriculum and assessment frameworks and syllabuses at senior secondary level have responded to the diversity in learner background through the provision of separate curricula and assessment schemes for different learner groups based on country of birth, prior educational experience and languages used at home. However the impact of learner background on learning and achievement as learners progress through Chinese language programs both in primary and secondary school remains under-researched. In particular, evidence of how the performance of second language learners differs from that of learners who a) speak the language at home and b) may have substantial community schooling experience beyond the school classroom, or c) were born and initially educated in Chinese, is very limited. This paper reports on the results of the Student Achievement in Asian Languages Education (SAALE) Project (Scarino et al., 2011; Scarino, this issue and Elder, Kim & Knoch, this issue) with regard to student achievement in Chinese. It focuses on the writing performance of Year 10 learners of Chinese and considers specifically the impact of language background by comparing performances between Australian-born students who do and do not speak Chinese at home. Scores assigned to students’ writing gathered on common test procedures confirms the expectation that background language learners perform at significantly higher levels and suggests that the two groups also differ in the nature of that performance. The implications of this data for the teaching, learning and assessment of Chinese in schools, and for the appropriate provision of programs for these different groups of learners is discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document