Assessing donor suitability for blood donation: Utility of Geenius HIV 1/2 confirmatory assay

Author(s):  
Nevenka Bujandric ◽  
Jasmina Grujic ◽  
Zorana Budakov Obradovic
PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. e0198924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makiko Kondo ◽  
Koji Sudo ◽  
Takako Sano ◽  
Takuya Kawahata ◽  
Ichiro Itoda ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Desmyter

AIDS virus (HIV) transmission by transfusions and blood products has been essentially halted in industrialized countries which haye introduced systematic anti-HIV screening of donations in 1985. New anti-HIV screening assays, based in part on the replacement of disrupted HIV virions by defined DNA recombinant HIV antigens, have improved specificity; sensitivity has been improved as to dectect seroconversion at an earlier stage. Confirmatory assays and (self-)exclusion of risk groups from blood donation do remain mandatory. HIVAg can be detected in some infections before antibody conversion, and HIVAg is more likely to be found in those anti-HIV positives who proceed to disease. However, there is no justification so far for routine parallel HIVAg and anti-HIV screening. There is continued uncertainty how many HIV carriers have not (yet) developed antibody, but their numbers may have been overestimated. Studies to determine how many HIV transmitters have escaped blood bank detection, and why, need to be undertaken in spite of formidable logistic difficulties.The risk of developing AIDS is now estimated at 25-50 % within 10 years after the infectious contact. It is not clear whether the risk should be estimated differently in different groups or persons. In cities in Central Africa, 5-20 % of men and women are confirmed anti-HIV positives. At least 75 % of this HIV carrier rate is due to heterosexual transmission. Heterosexual transmission has been slower in Western countries, but factors precluding slow evolution to high figures by the same route outside Africa have not been identified. Therefore, countries have no choice in advocating behaviour changes in the general population, and not only in the classical risk groups. Initial hesitations toward extended voluntary and confidential screening are dwindling. Well-conceived confidential screening may be the only way to avoid strong-armed government intervention. The latter is certain to be divisive, and is likely to be counterproductive on balance.An efficacious vaccine remains remote, but an antiviral which prolongs life by at least several months in AIDS patients, but not all of them, is now available. Zidovudine (AZT), however, is toxic and mere prolongation of life without cure will impose an additional burden on AIDS economics.A novel virus (HIV-2) has been identified and is already widespread in West-Africans. It causes AIDS, but the present ratio of AIDS cases in those infected seems lower than with HIV(-l); this feature may be transient. HIV-2 antibodies are either detected or missed by anti-HIV-1 screens; if found, they can be distinguished from anti-HIV-1 only by special confirmatory technique. New screening assays showing equal sensitivity for HIV-1 and HIV-2 in a single test should be devised. At present, HIV-2 is very rare in Western countries compared to HIV-1.


2015 ◽  
Vol 224 ◽  
pp. 91-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Friedrichs ◽  
C. Buus ◽  
A. Berger ◽  
O.T. Keppler ◽  
H.F. Rabenau
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bouchra Serhir ◽  
Céline Desjardins ◽  
Florence Doualla-Bell ◽  
Marc Simard ◽  
Cécile Tremblay ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The rapid confirmatory Bio-Rad Geenius HIV 1/2 assay was evaluated as an alternative to the HIV-1 Western blot (WB) confirmatory assay. A total of 370 retrospective samples collected from 356 patients were tested. Sensitivity of the Geenius assay to detect HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections was 100% and 97%, respectively, and that of the WB assay was 86% and 39%, respectively. Geenius reduced the number of indeterminate results by 85% and exhibited a differentiation capacity for HIV-1 and HIV-2 of 100% and 89%, respectively. Three of 10 patients presenting with an early HIV infection (1 to 2 weeks before seroconversion by WB) were positive using Geenius. None of the HIV-negative samples were positive using Geenius or WB. However, 7% and 10% of them were indeterminate with Geenius and WB, respectively, leading to a specificity rate of 93% for Geenius and 90% for WB. Ninety cadaveric samples (54 negative, 23 HIV-1 positive, and 3 HIV-1 indeterminate) were tested with Geenius, leading to a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 96%, and an indeterminate rate of 4%. Our results indicate that the Bio-Rad Geenius HIV 1/2 rapid test exhibits better sensitivity to detect HIV-1 infections and better performance than WB to confirm and differentiate between HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections. The performance of this new confirmatory assay to detect early infections, to reduce the rate of indeterminate status, and to confirm HIV-1 infection in cadaveric blood samples makes Geenius a potent reliable alternative to the WB.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Montesinos ◽  
J Eykmans ◽  
ML Delforge
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 47-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Tuaillon ◽  
A. Sanosyan ◽  
A. Pisoni ◽  
J. Liscouët ◽  
A. Makinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Stefic ◽  
Nadia Mahjoub ◽  
Céline Desouche ◽  
Marie Laure Néré ◽  
Damien Thierry ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Identification of HIV infection at the early stage is valuable for patient management, for prevention, and for research purposes. In practice, identification of a recent HIV infection at diagnosis proves challenging after HIV antibody seroconversion but can be suspected using Western blots (WBs) or immunoblots (IBs) as confirmatory assays. Methods Five commercially available confirmatory assays were compared using 43 samples from recently infected individuals. This included 2 WBs (New LAV Blot I, Biorad, and HIV Blot 2.2, MP Biomedicals), 2 IBs (INNO-LIA HIV I/II, Fujirebio, and RecomLine HIV-1 & HIV-2, Mikrogen Diagnostik), and 1 immunochromatographic single-use assay (Geenius HIV1/2 supplemental assay, Biorad). Results Following the manufacturer’s recommendations for interpretation, the 2 WBs led to indeterminate results for 30% and 42% of the samples, suggesting recent infection, compared with 2%–7% for the 3 other assays. When interpreted based on the Fiebig classification, concordant stages were observed in 42% of samples, and only 49% were classified as early seroconversion by all 5 assays. For the remaining specimens, the distinction with chronic infection was highly variable depending on the assay (5%–100%). Conclusions Clinical laboratories must consider this variability, which must be kept in mind both for initial diagnosis and for multicenter studies for which inclusion criteria refer to serological profiles by confirmatory assays.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document