Recognition of Kidney Donation by Living Kidney Donors That Accompanies Changes in the Recipients’ Physical Condition: Focusing on Its Influences on Donors

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 944-949
Author(s):  
Y. Takada
Author(s):  
Geir Mjøen ◽  
Umberto Maggiore ◽  
Nicos Kessaris ◽  
Diederik Kimenai ◽  
Bruno Watschinger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Publications from the last decade have increased knowledge regarding long-term risks after kidney donation. We wanted to perform a survey to assess how transplant professionals in Europe inform potential kidney donors regarding long-term risks. The objectives of the survey were to determine how they inform donors and to what extent, and to evaluate the degree of variation. Methods All transplant professionals involved in the evaluation process were considered eligible, regardless of the type of profession. The survey was dispatched as a link to a web-based survey. The subjects included questions on demographics, the information policy of the respondent and the use of risk calculators, including the difference of relative and absolute risks and how the respondents themselves understood these risks. Results The main finding was a large variation in how often different long-term risks were discussed with the potential donors, i.e. from always to never. Eighty percent of respondents stated that they always discuss the risk of end-stage renal disease, while 56% of respondents stated that they always discuss the risk of preeclampsia. Twenty percent of respondents answered correctly regarding the relationship between absolute and relative risks for rare outcomes. Conclusions The use of written information and checklists should be encouraged. This may improve standardization regarding the information provided to potential living kidney donors in Europe. There is a need for information and education among European transplant professionals regarding long-term risks after kidney donation and how to interpret and present these risks.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Trachtman ◽  
Brendan Parent ◽  
Ari Kirshenbaum ◽  
Arthur Caplan

Background: Compared to dialysis, living kidney donation has a greater chance of restoring health and is associated with better outcomes than deceased kidney donation. Although physicians advocate for this treatment, it is uncertain how they would act as potential living kidney donors or recipients. Methods: We surveyed 104 physicians, pediatric, and internal medicine nephrologists, to ascertain their attitudes toward living donation. Results: Among surveyed nephrologists, there was nearly universal support for living kidney donation as a viable medical option, and nearly all of them would support a healthy and medically cleared patient who wishes to participate. Although support was still strong, nephrologists were significantly less likely to support their friends and relatives participating in living kidney donation, and their support declined further for friends and relatives donating to nonrelatives. Conclusion: Our findings suggest the need to more deeply examine physician-perceived risks involved in serving as a living kidney donor. Based on differences in surveyed nephrologist attitudes regarding donation to and from loved ones versus nonrelatives, we suggest that physicians should give careful consideration to how they describe the risks of living donation to potential donors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35
Author(s):  
WALTER GLANNON

Abstract:This article examines two questions. (1) If prospective living kidney donors knew of the lifetime risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in their remaining kidney, then would they be as willing to give it up? and (2) What should transplant organizations and physicians be telling those who express an interest in donating a kidney about risk? Based on the principle that prospective donors must be fully informed of the risk, I raise the issue of a possible obstacle to closing the gap between the availability and need of transplantable kidneys. Some strategies are offered to address this problem.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1493-1499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtenay M. Holscher ◽  
Christine E. Haugen ◽  
Kyle R. Jackson ◽  
Jacqueline M. Garonzik Wang ◽  
Madeleine M. Waldram ◽  
...  

Background and objectivesThe risk of hypertension attributable to living kidney donation remains unknown as does the effect of developing postdonation hypertension on subsequent eGFR. We sought to understand the association between living kidney donation, hypertension, and long-term eGFR by comparing donors with a cohort of healthy nondonors.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsWe compared 1295 living kidney donors with median 6 years of follow-up with a weighted cohort of 8233 healthy nondonors. We quantified the risk of self-reported hypertension using a parametric survival model. We examined the association of hypertension with yearly change in eGFR using multilevel linear regression and clustering by participant, with an interaction term for race.ResultsKidney donation was independently associated with a 19% higher risk of hypertension (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.41; P=0.04); this association did not vary by race (interaction P=0.60). For white and black nondonors, there was a mean decline in eGFR (−0.4 and −0.3 ml/min per year, respectively) that steepened after incident hypertension (−0.8 and −0.9 ml/min per year, respectively; both P<0.001). For white and black kidney donors, there was a mean increase in eGFR after donation (+0.4 and +0.6 ml/min per year, respectively) that plateaued after incident hypertension (0 and −0.2 ml/min per year, respectively; P=0.07 and P=0.01, respectively, after hypertension).ConclusionsKidney donors are at higher risk of hypertension than similar healthy nondonors, regardless of race. Donors who developed hypertension had a plateau in the usual postdonation increase of eGFR.


2021 ◽  
pp. 173-213
Author(s):  
Lainie Friedman ◽  
J. Richard Thistlethwaite, Jr

Given the growing gap between the demand and supply of kidneys needed for transplantation, and the better outcomes of living versus deceased donor kidney transplants, living kidney donation is being more aggressively endorsed and promoted. Traditionally, living kidney donors were ABO- and HLA-compatible with their recipients, with whom they were genetically and/or emotionally related. When a living donor-recipient pair is not compatible, there is growing acceptance of employing alternative living donor transplantation strategies such as paired kidney exchanges and domino chains. This chapter addresses the ethical and policy issues that are raised by participation in kidney paired exchanges and domino kidney chains. Specific attention is given to the participation of histocompatible donor-recipient pairs in these programs when the donor could just donate directly. Justice and other ethical issues raised by advance donor programs and list-paired exchanges are also discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (S3) ◽  
pp. S349-S350
Author(s):  
Fang Cheng Kuo ◽  
Cheng-Yen Chen ◽  
Che-Chuan Loong ◽  
Tsai-Hun Wu ◽  
Niang-Cheng Lin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e33-e33
Author(s):  
Ehsan Allah Kalteh ◽  
Shaker Salari lak ◽  
Ali Taghizadeh Afshari ◽  
Hamid Reza Khalkhali ◽  
Mousa Ghelichi-Ghojogh

Introduction: Concerns about the occurrence of premature kidney failure have been expressed a few years after the kidney donation in the donor due to increase in compensatory blood flow in the remaining kidney nephrons. Objectives: This study aimed to study the kidney function remaining in living kidney donors and its related factors. Patients and Methods: Data were collected from 30 kidney donors in Imam Khomeini hospital in Urmia and evaluated using SPSS-22 software. Results: The mean duration of nephrectomy was 36.36 ± 6.22 years. The mean serum creatinine was significantly increased at the time of examination than before donation, and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreased significantly (P<0.001). Male donors (P=0.025) and donors who did not have relative relationship with the recipient (P=0.44) had better kidney function. The renal function at the time of examination was 74.86% amount before donation. The glucose tolerance test (mg/dL 2 hours) of the donors increased significantly at the time of the study compared to the time before donation (P=0.049). Conclusion: The remaining kidney function of the donors has decreased significantly seven years after donation. It seems that kidney donors need more time to excrete excess glucose, so they are far from being over-carbohydrate.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunjeong Kang ◽  
Jangwook Lee ◽  
Sehoon Park ◽  
Yaerim Kim ◽  
Hyo Jeong Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract This study aimed to know how the general population recognizes live kidney donation in Korea. Participants were randomly selected from the general population after proportional allocation by region, sex, and age. Selected participants received a questionnaire that included demographic information, socioeconomic and marital statuses, prior recognition of live donor KT, expected changes after donation, and the need for support after donor nephrectomy. Among the 1,000 participants from the web-based survey, 83.8% answered they fully understood living donor KT, 81.1% knew about them, and 51.1% were willing to donate. Various complications after nephrectomy and deterioration in health after donation were the most significant reasons for those reluctant to donate. Most agreed that the government should provide social and economic support to living kidney donors, especially after exposure to the description of donor nephrectomy. Financial support, including surgery and regular medical check-up costs, was the most preferred government support. The Korean general population seemed aware of the value and safety of kidney donation, although only half of them were willing to donate due to concerns about possible complications. Most participants agreed on social and economic support for living kidney donors, especially surgery-related costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document