Linguatula serrata in cattle in southeastern Iran: Epidemiological, histopathological and phylogenetic profile and its zoonotic importance

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 100465
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ali Mohammadi ◽  
Mehdi Bamorovat ◽  
Iraj Sharifi ◽  
Mahshid Mostafavi ◽  
Mehdi Borhani Zarandi ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Enrico Crivellato ◽  
Luciana Travan ◽  
Domenico Ribatti

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinicius Godoy Cerezer ◽  
Silvia Yumi Bando ◽  
Jacyr Pasternak ◽  
Marcia Regina Franzolin ◽  
Carlos Alberto Moreira-Filho

Stenotrophomonasssp. has a wide environmental distribution and is also found as an opportunistic pathogen, causing nosocomial or community-acquired infections. One species,S. maltophilia, presents multidrug resistance and has been associated with serious infections in pediatric and immunocompromised patients. Therefore, it is relevant to conduct resistance profile and phylogenetic studies in clinical isolates for identifying infection origins and isolates with augmented pathogenic potential. Here, multilocus sequence typing was performed for phylogenetic analysis of nosocomial isolates ofStenotrophomonasspp. and, environmental and clinical strains ofS. maltophilia. Biochemical and multidrug resistance profiles of nosocomial and clinical strains were determined. The inferred phylogenetic profile showed high clonal variability, what correlates with the adaptability process ofStenotrophomonasto different habitats. Two clinical isolates subgroups ofS. maltophiliasharing high phylogenetic homogeneity presented intergroup recombination, thus indicating the high permittivity to horizontal gene transfer, a mechanism involved in the acquisition of antibiotic resistance and expression of virulence factors. For most of the clinical strains, phylogenetic inference was made using only partialppsA gene sequence. Therefore, the sequencing of just one specific fragment of this gene would allow, in many cases, determining whether the infection withS. maltophiliawas nosocomial or community-acquired.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e00111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabeeh Tabaripour ◽  
Azar Shokri ◽  
Saeed Hosseini Teshnizi ◽  
Mahdi Fakhar ◽  
Masoud Keighobadi

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (04) ◽  
pp. 260-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Springer ◽  
Hartmut Fiedler ◽  
Katharina Raue ◽  
Christina Strube

Zusammenfassung Linguatula serrata, der zu den Pentastomida zählende sogenannte „Zungenwurm“, ist ein im Mittleren Osten, Afrika und Asien verbreiteter Parasit, der beim Endwirt Hund im Nasopharynx parasitiert. Einst auch in Mitteleuropa endemisch, spielt die Linguatulose heute vor allem als Importparasitose eine Rolle. Da es sich bei L. serrata um einen Zoonoseerreger handelt, ist ein potenzielles Infektionsrisiko für den Tierbesitzer und andere Kontaktpersonen zu beachten. Im beschriebenen Fall wurde ein 1,5 Jahre alter, aus Rumänien importierter Hütehundmischling aufgrund von wässrigem Nasenausfluss und „kehligem Räuspern“ vorgestellt. Nach Ausniesen eines Parasiten, das zur Verdachtsdiagnose Linguatulose führte, klangen die klinischen Symptome zunächst ab. Acht Monate später nieste der Hund jedoch ein zweites L. serrata-Exemplar aus, sodass ein Behandlungsversuch mit Milbemycinoxim/Praziquantel begonnen wurde. In Kot- und Nasenschleimproben waren zu diesem Zeitpunkt keine Parasiteneier nachweisbar. Dieser Fallbericht zeigt die Schwierigkeiten in der Diagnostik und Therapie der Linguatulose auf und diskutiert diese im Hinblick auf das zoonotische Potenzial des Parasiten.


2010 ◽  
Vol 171 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 176-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeid R. Nourollahi Fard ◽  
Reza Kheirandish ◽  
Ehsan Norouzi Asl ◽  
Saeid Fathi
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Eva S Deutekom ◽  
Berend Snel ◽  
Teunis J P van Dam

Abstract Insights into the evolution of ancestral complexes and pathways are generally achieved through careful and time-intensive manual analysis often using phylogenetic profiles of the constituent proteins. This manual analysis limits the possibility of including more protein-complex components, repeating the analyses for updated genome sets or expanding the analyses to larger scales. Automated orthology inference should allow such large-scale analyses, but substantial differences between orthologous groups generated by different approaches are observed. We evaluate orthology methods for their ability to recapitulate a number of observations that have been made with regard to genome evolution in eukaryotes. Specifically, we investigate phylogenetic profile similarity (co-occurrence of complexes), the last eukaryotic common ancestor’s gene content, pervasiveness of gene loss and the overlap with manually determined orthologous groups. Moreover, we compare the inferred orthologies to each other. We find that most orthology methods reconstruct a large last eukaryotic common ancestor, with substantial gene loss, and can predict interacting proteins reasonably well when applying phylogenetic co-occurrence. At the same time, derived orthologous groups show imperfect overlap with manually curated orthologous groups. There is no strong indication of which orthology method performs better than another on individual or all of these aspects. Counterintuitively, despite the orthology methods behaving similarly regarding large-scale evaluation, the obtained orthologous groups differ vastly from one another. Availability and implementation The data and code underlying this article are available in github and/or upon reasonable request to the corresponding author: https://github.com/ESDeutekom/ComparingOrthologies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 1553-1562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane P. Barton ◽  
Ashleigh Baker ◽  
Megan Porter ◽  
Xiaocheng Zhu ◽  
David Jenkins ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document