scholarly journals FLICK: an optimized plate reader-based assay to infer cell death kinetics

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 100327
Author(s):  
Ryan Richards ◽  
Megan E. Honeywell ◽  
Michael J. Lee
Toxins ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sucharit Ray ◽  
Roshan Thapa ◽  
Peter Keyel

The largest superfamily of bacterial virulence factors is pore-forming toxins (PFTs). PFTs are secreted by both pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria. PFTs sometimes kill or induce pro-pathogen signaling in mammalian cells, all primarily through plasma membrane perforation, though the parameters that determine these outcomes are unclear. Membrane binding, calcium influx, pore size, and membrane repair are factors that influence PFT cytotoxicity. To test the contribution of membrane binding to cytotoxicity and repair, we compared the closely related, similarly-sized PFTs Perfringolysin O (PFO) from Clostridium perfringens and Streptolysin O (SLO) from Streptococcus pyogenes. Cell death kinetics for PFO and SLO were different because PFO increased in cytotoxicity over time. We introduced known L3 loop mutations that swap binding affinity between toxins and measured hemolytic activity, nucleated cell death kinetics and membrane repair using viability assays, and live cell imaging. Altered hemolytic activity was directly proportional to toxin binding affinity. In contrast, L3 loop alterations reduced nucleated cell death, and they had limited effects on cytotoxicity kinetics and membrane repair. This suggests other toxin structural features, like oligomerization, drives these parameters. Overall, these findings suggest that repair mechanisms and toxin oligomerization add constraints beyond membrane binding on toxin evolution and activity against nucleated cells.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 785-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Li ◽  
Junying Yuan
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Goncharuk ◽  
A. V. Syroeshkin ◽  
I. A. Zlatskiy ◽  
E. V. Uspenskaya ◽  
A. V. Orekhova ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. 667-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Chu ◽  
Edith A. Leonhardt ◽  
Maxine Trinh ◽  
Geraldine Prieur-Carrillo ◽  
Johan Lindqvist ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. MARC ◽  
A. WAGNER ◽  
A. MARTIAL ◽  
J.L. GOERGEN ◽  
J.M. ENGASSER ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. S803
Author(s):  
A. Gago-Arias ◽  
I. Espinoza ◽  
B. Sánchez-Nieto ◽  
J. Pardo-Montero

APOPTOSIS ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Wolbers ◽  
P. Buijtenhuijs ◽  
C. Haanen ◽  
I. Vermes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Oliver Metzig ◽  
Ying Tang ◽  
Simon Mitchell ◽  
Brooks Taylor ◽  
Robert Foreman ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBalancing cell death is essential to maintain healthy tissue homeostasis and prevent disease. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) not only activates nuclear factor κB (NFκB), which coordinates the cellular response to inflammation, but may also trigger necroptosis, a pro-inflammatory form of cell death. Whether TNF-induced NFκB cross-regulates TNF-induced necroptosis fate decisions is unclear. Live-cell microscopy and model-aided analysis of death kinetics identified a molecular circuit that interprets TNF-induced NFκB/RelA dynamics to control necroptosis decisions. Inducible expression of TNFAIP3/A20 forms an incoherent feedforward loop to interfere with the RIPK3-containing necrosome complex and protect a fraction of cells from transient, but not long-term TNF exposure. Furthermore, dysregulated NFκB dynamics often associated with disease diminish TNF-induced necroptosis. Our results suggest that TNF’s dual roles in either coordinating cellular responses to inflammation, or further amplifying inflammation are determined by a dynamic NFκB-A20-RIPK3 circuit, that could be targeted to treat inflammation and cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document