Metformin and endometrial cancer risk in Chinese women with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Taiwan

2015 ◽  
Vol 138 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chin-Hsiao Tseng
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 503-510
Author(s):  
Yueyao Li ◽  
Michael S. Hendryx ◽  
Pengcheng Xun ◽  
Ka He ◽  
Aladdin H. Shadyab ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei-Fang Yao ◽  
Jie He ◽  
Xue Sun ◽  
Xiao-Li Ji ◽  
Yue Ding ◽  
...  

Coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke are common complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to explore the differences in the risks of CHD and stroke between Chinese women and men with T2DM and their association with metabolic syndrome (MS). This study included 1514 patients with T2DM. The Asian Guidelines of ATPIII (2005) were used for MS diagnosis, and the UKPDS risk engine was used to evaluate the 10-year CHD and stroke risks. Women had lower CHD risk (15.3% versus 26.3%), fatal CHD risk (11.8% versus 19.0%), stroke risk (8.4% versus 10.3%), and fatal stroke risk (1.4% versus 1.6%) compared with men with T2DM (p<0.05–0.001). The CHD risk (28.4% versus 22.6%, p<0.001) was significantly higher in men with MS than in those without MS. The CHD (16.2% versus 11.0%, p<0.001) and stroke risks (8.9% versus 5.8%, p<0.001) were higher in women with MS than in those without MS. In conclusion, our findings indicated that Chinese women with T2DM are less susceptible to CHD and stroke than men. Further, MS increases the risk of both these events, highlighting the need for comprehensive metabolic control in T2DM.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. E. C. Sun ◽  
B. J. Wells ◽  
K. Yip ◽  
R. Zimmerman ◽  
D. Raghavan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Hung Kao

BACKGROUND Breast cancer incidence may be higher among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared with the general population. This study evaluated the performance of three models for predicting breast cancer risk in patients with T2DM. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the performance of three models for predicting breast cancer risk in patients with T2DM. METHODS In total, 1,267,867 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM between 2000 and 2012 were identified from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. By employing their data, we created prediction models for detecting an increased risk of subsequent breast cancer development in T2DM patients. The available potential risk factors for breast cancer were also collected for adjustment in the analyses. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was used to augment data points in the minority class. Each data point was randomly allocated to the training and test sets at a ratio of approximate 39:1. The performance of artificial neural network (ANN), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF) models were determined using the recall, precision, F1 score, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS The AUCs of all three models were significantly higher than the area of 0.5 for the null hypothesis (0.959, 0.865, and 0.834 for RF, ANN, and LR models, respectively). The RF model has the largest AUC among all models; moreover, it had the highest values in all other metrics. CONCLUSIONS Although all three models could accurately predict high breast cancer risk in patients with T2DM in Taiwan, the RF model demonstrated the best performance. CLINICALTRIAL This is not a chinical trial.


2011 ◽  
Vol 152 (29) ◽  
pp. 1144-1155 ◽  
Author(s):  
András Rosta

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and malignant tumors are frequent diseases worldwide. The incidence of these two diseases is growing continuously and causes serious health care problem. Population based epidemiologic studies show that the coexistence of type 2 diabetes and malignant tumors is more frequent than expected by the age-corrected incidence and prevalence of each disease. Epidemiologic studies and meta-analyses show that type 2 diabetes increases the risk and tumor specific mortality of certain cancers. The overlapping risk factors of the diseases suggest a relationship between type 2 diabetes and malignant tumors, with a significant role of obesity as a major risk factor. In the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes there are several biological processes, which may explain the higher cancer risk in type 2 diabetes. In vitro experiments, and in vivo animal studies show that the mitotic effect of hyperinsulinemia plays an important role in the relationship of cancer and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent studies show that the different treatment modalities, antidiabetic drugs and their combinations used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes can modify cancer risk. The majority of the data show that metformin therapy decreases, while insulin secretagog drugs slightly increase the risk of certain types of cancers in type 2 diabetes. Metformin can decrease cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in certain cancer cell lines. Endogenous and exogenous (therapy induced) hyperinsulinemia may be mitogenic and may increase the risk of cancer in type 2 diabetes. Human studies showed that the analogue insulin glargin increases the risk of certain cancers. As a result of conceptual weaknesses in study design, data collection, and statistical methods the results of these studies are questionable. According to present knowledge, obtaining and maintaining optimal metabolic target values with the appropriate choice of treatment modality is the aim of treatment in type 2 diabetes. Presently, study results showing elevated mitogenic potential with some antidiabetic treatment modalities are not taken into account, when considering the choice of antidiabetic treatment in type 2 diabetic patients. In the care of patients with increased cancer risk, oncologic considerations should be taken into account. Well designed, prospective, clinical studies would be necessary to demonstrate the possible correlation between treatment modalities of type 2 diabetes and change of cancer risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Orv. Hetil., 2011, 152, 1144–1155.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adedayo A. Onitilo ◽  
Rachel V. Stankowski ◽  
Richard L. Berg ◽  
Jessica M. Engel ◽  
Ingrid Glurich ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document