Prognostic impact of debulking surgery and residual tumor in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer FIGO stage IV

2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beyhan Ataseven ◽  
Christoph Grimm ◽  
Philipp Harter ◽  
Florian Heitz ◽  
Alexander Traut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Debulking Surgery

scholarly journals The FIGO Stage IVA Versus IVB of Ovarian Cancer: Prognostic Value and Predictive Value for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parvin Tajik ◽  
Roelien van de Vrie ◽  
Mohammad H. Zafarmand ◽  
Corneel Coens ◽  
Marrije R. Buist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Figo Staging ◽  
Stage Ivb

ObjectiveThe revised version of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system (2014) for epithelial ovarian cancer includes a number of changes. One of these is the division of stage IV into 2 subgroups. Data on the prognostic and predictive significance of this classification are scarce. The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS) in relation to the subclassification of FIGO stage IV is also unknown.MethodsWe used data of the EORTC 55971 trial, in which 670 patients with previous stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to PDS or NACT; 160 patients had previous stage IV. Information on previous FIGO staging and presence of pleural effusion with positive cytology were used to classify tumors as either stage IVA or IVB. We tested the association between stage IVA/IVB and survival to evaluate the prognostic value and interactions between stage, treatment, and survival to evaluate the predictive performance.ResultsAmong the 160 participants with previous stage IV disease, 103 (64%) were categorized as stage IVA and 57 (36%) as stage IVB tumors. Median overall survival was 24 months in FIGO stage IVA and 31 months in stage IVB patients (P = 0.044). Stage IVB patients treated with NACT had 9 months longer median overall survival compared with IVB patients undergoing PDS (P = 0.025), whereas in IVA patients, no significant difference was observed (24 vs 26 months, P = 0.48).ConclusionsThe reclassification of FIGO stage IV into stage IVA or IVB was not prognostic as expected. Compared with stage IVA patients, stage IVB patients have a better overall survival and may benefit more from NACT.

Interval Debulking Surgery After Neodjuvant Chemotherapy Vs Primary Debulking Surgery For Stage Iii Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15-15
Author(s):  
BM Ahmed ◽  
AT Amin ◽  
MK Khallaf ◽  
A Ahmed Refaat ◽  
SA Sileem
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Primary Debulking Surgery ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery ◽  
Disease Free

Introduction: Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and is the fifth most common cause of cancer-related death among women. Approach to FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer remains challengeable. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of interval debulking surgery (IDS) vs. primary debulking surgery (PDS) for FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. Materials and Methods: During a period of six years (January 2014 to December 2019), we analyzed the patients for eligibility criteria, which were: (1) FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. (2) The age of 18 years or more (3) Patients underwent either PDS or IDS and received chemotherapy at South Egypt Cancer Institute. We divided them into two groups: (1) Those received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then underwent IDS plus three additional cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy and (2) Those who have PDS followed by six cycles of chemotherapy. Results: This study includes 380 eligible patients. The first group included 226 patients (59.47%) underwent PDS then 6 cycles of chemotherapy, while the group of IDS included 154 patients (40.53%). The treatment modality was not significant for overall survival (OS); however disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly reduced after IDS when compared to PDS (median DFS: 33 months; 95% CI 30.23-35.77 vs. 45 months; 95% CI 41.25-48.75 respectively; p= .000). Moreover, in subgroup analysis, OS and DFS were significantly dropped after IDS in elderly patients, patients with bad performance status, sub-optimal cytoreduction as well as high grade and undifferentiated tumors when compared to those who underwent PDS. Conclusion: Although treatment modality may not impact overall survival (OS), however, PDS results in a better disease-free survival than IDS. Moreover, IDS results in a significant drop in OS and DFS in special patients subgroups when compared to PDS. Therefore patients selection should be considered.

scholarly journals A Practical Nomogram to Predict Early Death in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zixuan Song ◽  
Yangzi Zhou ◽  
Xue Bai ◽  
Dandan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Premature Death ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Gynecological Malignancy ◽  
Clinical Pragmatism

Background: Ovarian cancer is a common gynecological malignancy, most of which is epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Advanced EOC is linked with a higher incidence of premature death. To date, no effective prognostic tools are available to evaluate the possibility of early death in patients with advanced EOC.Methods: Advanced (FIGO stage III and IV) EOC patients who were enrolled in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2015 were regarded as subjects and studied. We aimed to construct a nomogram that can deliver early death prognosis in patients with advanced EOC by identifying crucial independent factors using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to help deliver accurate prognoses.Results: In total, 13,403 patients with advanced EOC were included in this study. Three hundred ninety-seven out of a total of 9,379 FIGO stage III patients died early. There were 4,024 patients with FIGO stage IV, 414 of whom died early. Nomograms based on independent prognostic factors have the satisfactory predictive capability and clinical pragmatism. The internal validation feature of the nomogram demonstrated a high level of accuracy of the predicted death.Conclusions: By analyzing data from a large cohort, a clinically convenient nomogram was established to predict premature death in advanced EOC. This tool can aid clinicians in screening patients who are at higher risk for tailoring treatment plans.

When and Who Should Perform Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery?

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 594-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Escayola ◽  
Juan Jose Torrent ◽  
Gwenaël Ferron ◽  
François Quenet ◽  
Denis Querleu
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Postgraduate Training ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
International Federation ◽  
Gynecologic Malignancies ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Current Review ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics

AbstractEpithelial ovarian cancer is the most common cause of death due to gynecologic malignancies. Most patients will be diagnosed at an advanced stage, and despite progress in both surgical procedures and novel targeted therapies, the overall survival of these patients remains very low. Among prognostic factors, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage and residual tumor after debulking surgery are the most widely reported. The current review aims to highlight the disparities in the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer and the need for postgraduate training programs in order to accredit gynecologic oncologists. Despite an increase over the centralization of these patients, many are still not receiving specialized surgery.

Evaluation of serial serum IL-6 levels in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer on a prospective clinical trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5065-5065 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mahoney ◽  
H. Lee ◽  
R. Foster ◽  
U. Matulonis ◽  
Z. Duan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Sandwich Elisa ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Surgical Debulking

5065 Background: Elevated levels of IL-6 in serum have been reported in patients (pts) with mullerian malignancies (MM) and have been associated with a poor prognosis. Little is know about the behavior of IL-6 during effective cytotoxic therapy and its correlation to various clinical parameters. Methods: Pts with surgically debulked FIGO Stage II, III, and IV MM were enrolled in the Modified Triple Doublets trial. 83 pts were assigned to a cohort in accordance with the extent of surgical debulking. Cohort I included women who had been optimally cytoreduced to <1cm of residual tumor. Cohort II consisted of pts who had either post-debulking residual disease >1cm or stage IV disease. Both cohorts were treated with 3 sequential chemotherapy doublets, gemcitabine/carboplatin, paclitaxel/carboplatin, and adriamycin/topotecan. Each doublet was delivered for 3 cycles. Serum was collected from pts prior to initiating each doublet at cycles 1, 4, 7 and at the end of study (post cycle 9). Serum IL-6 levels were measured in triplicate by sandwich ELISA. Results: Pts with MM had elevated levels of IL-6 following debulking surgery (mean = 12.7 pg/ml) as compared to normal controls (n = 11, mean IL-6 = 1.5 pg/ml, p =.01). While there was no significant correlation between IL-6 levels and stage of disease, the IL-6 serum concentrations did correlate with extent of surgical debulking (p = 0.0182). IL-6 concentrations dropped throughout all cycles of platinum based treatment with post platinum treatment mean concentration of 3.9pg/ml. IL-6 levels did not correlate with outcome of second look operation and there was no statistically significant correlation between IL-6 and CA-125 levels (p = 0.1612). Survival data is still immature with a median follow-up of 34 months, yet elevation of IL-6 levels following surgery demonstrates a trend towards inferior survival. Conclusions: IL-6 levels are elevated in ovarian cancer pts following surgical debulking and correlate with the volume of residual disease following surgical cytoreduction. Values decrease during cytoreductive platinum based chemotherapy although IL-6 was not as predictive of response as was CA-125. Data demonstrates a weak correlation betweenworse survival and elevated IL-6 levels. Supported by the Lana Vento Foundation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Timing of debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Vergote ◽  
T. Van Gorp ◽  
F. Amant ◽  
K. Leunen ◽  
P. Neven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Primary Debulking Surgery ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery ◽  
Tumor Load

It is clear that primary debulking remains the standard of care within the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (FIGO stage III and IV). This debulking surgery should be performed by a gynecological oncologist without any residual tumor load, or so-called “optimal debulking.” Over the last decades, interest in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy together with an interval debulking has increased. Neoadjuvant therapy can be used for patients who are primarily suboptimally debulked due to an extensive tumor load. In this situation, based on the randomized European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer–Gynaecological Cancer Group trial, interval debulking by an experienced surgeon improves survival in some patients who did not undergo optimal primary debulking surgery. Based on the GOG 152 data, interval debulking surgery does not seem to be indicated in patients who underwent primarily a maximal surgical effort by a gynecological oncologist. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can also be used as an alternative to primary debulking. In retrospective analyses, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery does not seem to worsen prognosis compared to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy. However, we will have to wait for the results of future randomized trials to know whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery is a good alternative to primary debulking surgery in stage IIIc and IV patients. Open laparoscopy is probably the most valuable tool for evaluating the operability primarily or at the time of interval debulking surgery

Influence of Residual Tumor on Outcome in Ovarian Cancer Patients With FIGO Stage IV Disease

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1642-1648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Wimberger ◽  
Michael Wehling ◽  
Nils Lehmann ◽  
Rainer Kimmig ◽  
Barbara Schmalfeldt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Stage Iv Disease

Long-term survival and prognostic factors in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with special emphasis upon the effects of protocol inclusion

1994 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Bertelsen ◽  
J. E. Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

The Danish Ovarian Cancer Study Group registered 722 patients in stages III and IV during the period 1981–1986. The material included 85% of all ovarian cancer patients in the catchment area of the group and patients allocated to protocol as well as patients treated outside protocols. Five and 10-year survival were: stage III 17%, and 8%, respectively; and stage IV 4% and 2%. Patients allocated to protocol had a significantly better survival than patients not included in protocols even when only patients younger than 70 years were compared. All non-protocol patients had a poorer prognosis irrespective of the reason for exclusion. Five-year survival for stage III protocol patients was 25% vs. 9%, for non-protocol patients younger than 70 years. The 10-year survival was 11% and 4% for stage III protocol and non-protocol patients, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that residual tumor, age, stage, and performance status had prognostic value. In non protocol patients histologic grade had an additional marginal prognostic impact. In conclusion the study showed that the statement that long-term survival in advanced ovarian cancer has been increased could not be proven by comparison of survival from randomized studies performed in the early eighties with survival of stage III and IV patients before the introduction of cisplatinum chemotherapy. It is necessary to consider survival of all patients, protocol and non-protocol in a geographically well-defined region for evaluation of survival improvement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document