Outside the operating room: How a robotics program changed resource utilization on the inpatient Ward

2017 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Leung ◽  
Jeremie Abitbol ◽  
Agnihotram V. Ramana-Kumar ◽  
Bassam Fadlallah ◽  
Roy Kessous ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (S2) ◽  
pp. 397-402
Author(s):  
Fabio D’Angelo ◽  
Luca Monestier ◽  
Giovanni De Falco ◽  
Michael Mazzacane ◽  
Placido Stissi

Abstract Background As a result of the uncontrolled spread of the COVID-19 virus infection, a health reorganization according to the “hub and spoke” model was necessary. The purpose of the article was to document the adopted corporate protocol and describe the management of the traumatized patient in a Hub center. Methods Our hospital has been identified as one of the three regional Hubs for polytrauma and major traumas, requiring suitable pathways to receive confirmed or suspected COVID-19-positive patients, from the emergency room entrance to the operating room, and finally to the inpatient ward or ICU. From February 23th to April 30th 2020 we analyzed the total number of trauma patients hospitalized and the number of femoral neck fractures surgically treated within 48 h; the data were then compared with the corresponding period of the previous year. Results There has been a reduction in the overall number of traumas as a result of government restraint measures. Total occupancy time in the operating theater has increased, but not drastically considering dressing procedures and anesthesia (carried out inside the operating room). The number of patients with femoral neck fractures surgically treated within 48 h (none of the COVID-19-positive patients) decreased from 83.33 to 58.70%, but only slightly lower than the Italian pre-COVID average of 64.70%. Conclusions The correct management of the hospital and the meticulous organization of the traumatized patient have made it possible to contain the potential negative effects on the medical care quality during this unexpected and severe health emergency.


2020 ◽  
pp. 084047042096991
Author(s):  
R. Andrew Glennie ◽  
William M. Oxner ◽  
Jacob Alant ◽  
Sean P. Barry ◽  
Sean Christie

Surgical case costing is critical for health leaders to make decisions about resource utilization. Synoptic reporting offers the potential for surgeons to capture these costs and work with other leaders to make evidence-based decisions. The purpose of this study was to determine whether surgeons documented intra-operative cost drivers as part of their operative report. This article outlines a synoptic reporting system at a quaternary spine care centre. Data were captured from 2015 to 2020. Surgeon rates of documentation for specific devices, bone graft, and surgical adjuncts were evaluated. It is hoped that the results of this survey will help to guide programs to capture costs in other settings.


Author(s):  
J. D. Shelburne ◽  
Peter Ingram ◽  
Victor L. Roggli ◽  
Ann LeFurgey

At present most medical microprobe analysis is conducted on insoluble particulates such as asbestos fibers in lung tissue. Cryotechniques are not necessary for this type of specimen. Insoluble particulates can be processed conventionally. Nevertheless, it is important to emphasize that conventional processing is unacceptable for specimens in which electrolyte distributions in tissues are sought. It is necessary to flash-freeze in order to preserve the integrity of electrolyte distributions at the subcellular and cellular level. Ideally, biopsies should be flash-frozen in the operating room rather than being frozen several minutes later in a histology laboratory. Electrolytes will move during such a long delay. While flammable cryogens such as propane obviously cannot be used in an operating room, liquid nitrogen-cooled slam-freezing devices or guns may be permitted, and are the best way to achieve an artifact-free, accurate tissue sample which truly reflects the in vivo state. Unfortunately, the importance of cryofixation is often not understood. Investigators bring tissue samples fixed in glutaraldehyde to a microprobe laboratory with a request for microprobe analysis for electrolytes.


2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 4-4
Author(s):  
Gurkirpal Singh ◽  
Smriti Malla ◽  
Huijian Wang ◽  
Harcharan Gill ◽  
Kristijian H. Kahler ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 35-35
Author(s):  
Brent K. Hollenbeck ◽  
David C. Miller ◽  
Rodney L. Dunn ◽  
Willie Underwood ◽  
Shukri F. Khuri ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document