A patch near-field acoustical holography procedure based on a generalized discrete Fourier series

2017 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 285-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Pasqual
2021 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 107711
Author(s):  
Man-Ying Zhang ◽  
Ding-Yu Hu ◽  
Chao Yang ◽  
Wei Shi ◽  
Ai-Hua Liao

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 49-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
SUNG-IL KIM ◽  
JEONG-GUON IH ◽  
JI-HOON JEONG

This paper suggests the use of rigid reflectors to provide additional information for source reconstruction in near-field acoustical holography based on the inverse boundary element method. The additional field pressure and transfer matrix equations introduced provide a virtual increase in the measurement data without increasing the number of sensors or altering their arrangement, which could cost more than using reflectors. In order to validate this method, we successfully reconstruct a vibrating ellipse.


2014 ◽  
Vol 599-601 ◽  
pp. 922-926
Author(s):  
Guo Liang Xu ◽  
Qi Wei He ◽  
Shao Chun Ding ◽  
Hai Bo Wan

To analyze effects of quay environment on the AUV radiated acoustic field test, the PNAH (PNAH: planar near-field acoustical holography) was used to simulate acoustic field. By simulating the free and non-free acoustic field and comparing amplitudes and angles of complex sound pressure, Analyze effects of quay wall and seabed reflection on the AUV radiated acoustic field test to determine the standard of quay wall and seabed environment which meets testing. The work would provide a certain reference for the AUV radiated acoustic field test.


Author(s):  
Albert C. J. Luo ◽  
Yaoguang Yuan

In this paper, period-1 motions varying with excitation frequency in a periodically forced, nonlinear spring pendulum system are predicted by a semi-analytic method. The harmonic frequency-amplitude for periodical motions are analyzed from the finite discrete Fourier series. The stability of the periodical solutions are shown on the bifurcation trees as well. From the analytical prediction, numerical illustrations of periodic motions are given, the comparison of numerical solution and analytical solution are given.


2011 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 2493-2493
Author(s):  
David W. Krueger ◽  
Kent L. Gee ◽  
Alan T. Wall ◽  
Scott D. Sommerfeldt ◽  
Jonathan D. Blotter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document